Chess Opening Theory/1. e4/1...e5/2. f4/2...exf4

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to navigation Jump to search

King's Gambit Accepted[edit | edit source]

If Black could make a free move in this position, it would undoubtedly be ...Qh4+. White can't block with the g-pawn thanks to the Black pawn on f4, so the awkward 3. Ke2 would be forced.

How should White deal with that threat?

The most obvious approach is to control the h4 square, with the natural developing move 3. Nf3.

The only reasonable alternative to that is to create an empty square for the king to run to after the check on h4. 3. Bc4 accomplishes this while also developing a piece to a square where it will threaten Black's weak f7 point. This is statistically White's best approach against the King's Gambit Accepted, in that White wins only slightly fewer games than Black does. Since in most openings White wins rather more games than Black by virtue of going first, this is a considerable fall from grace for the King's Gambit since the "romantic" era of chess in the 19th century.

Theory table[edit | edit source]

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation..

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4

3 4 5 6 7
King's Knight Gambit Nf3
g5
h4
g4
Ne5
Nf6
d4
d6
Nd3
Nxe4
King's Bishop Gambit Bc4
...
=
Lesser Bishop's Gambit Be2
...
Villemson Gambitd4?!

Qh4+

Mason Gambit Nc3?!
-
Breyer Gambit Qf3?!
-
=/+
King's Own Gambit Kf2?!
Qh4+
g3
fxg3
Kg2
Qxe4+
-/+

When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.

References[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]