Wikibooks:Requests for deletion

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
(Redirected from Wikibooks:RFD)
Jump to: navigation, search
Replacement filing cabinet.svgArchivesWikibooks Discussion Rooms
Discussions Assistance Requests
General | Proposals | Projects | Featured books General | Technical | Administrative Deletion | Undeletion | Import | Permissions | Renaming
Requests for (Un)deletion Archives
  • Close discussion with {{closed}}/{{end closed}}
  • RFDs should be moved to subpages at Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/FullPageName
  • RFUs should be moved to subpages at Wikibooks:Requests for undeletion/FullPageName
  • Transclude subpage; remove after 7 days
Icon usage
  • {{subst:icon|info}} - important facts
  • {{subst:icon|keep}} - keep work
  • {{subst:icon|merge}} - merge work
  • {{subst:icon|transwiki}} - copy to another wiki
  • {{subst:icon|delete}} - delete work
  • {{subst:icon|redirect}} - delete and redirect
  • {{subst:icon|comment}} - neutral opinion

Undeletion[edit]

Wikimedia Commons logo Add a new entry

Pages and books can be deleted by administrators. These decisions are generally backed by consensus from a discussion on this page under the deletion section. No process is perfect, and as such, pages or books can be nominated for undeletion in this section. The following is the procedure:

  1. Locate the page entry in the deletion log or the archived discussion. Some deleted pages have been speedily deleted without discussion.
  2. Review the Wikibooks:Deletion policy and Wikibooks:Media. If you can build a fair case on something which wasn't considered before, you can raise the issue here.
  3. Please add new nominations at the bottom of the section. Include a link to the archived discussion (or deletion log if there was none) and your rationale for why the page should be undeleted. If the community agrees, the page will be restored.

If you wish to view a deleted module or media file, list it here and explain why. An administrator will provide the deleted module to you in some form - either by quoting it in full, emailing it to you, or temporarily undeleting it. If you feel that an administrator is routinely deleting modules prematurely, or otherwise abusing their tools, please discuss the matter on the user's talk page, or at Administrative Assistance.


I have had to delete the recipe you added as it was copied from another website that has a copyright notice. You will need to prove you own the copyright in order to add it to Wikibooks. Thanks QuiteUnusual (discusscontribs) 09:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


now, THIS was my own recipe. I uploaded it to allrecipes.com but alas it will not be kitchen approved due to my user name and nobody can bring it up. I then uploaded it to food.com who then added some nutritional information I don't care about. I then added some pictures to my recipe that I took myself with my tablet. I then added it to wikibooks by using the recipe template. I came back and found this idiot can't even READ the name of the submitter here and at food.com and notice it is in fact the same person.

I cannot find it in discussions or in any log entries.

It is raisin-cinnamon yeast raised doughnuts. I may not have had "yeast raised" in the title. It also fixes problems that most folks have with ingredients killing yeast. odd that a recipe that was donated to the public domain by me has been deleted because there's some stupid copyright notice someplace. the copyright is on the collection of recipes not individual ones and they also hold the copyright of the nutritional information which I did NOT provide here. Robert Dell (discusscontribs) 00:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

As apparently I am an "idiot" I decline to act on this request - another administrator will consider it. I will note however that having a username on one website that is the same as the username on another website is zero evidence that you are in fact (a) the same user and (b) actually the copyright holder. Or are you implying that you are the one and only Robert Dell in the whole world? There are specific instructions on how to provide evidence of ownership and I suggest to the closing administrator that they ensure you follow those before undeleting. QuiteUnusual (discusscontribs) 09:14, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Symbol comment vote.svg Comment The user would need to prove they have the legal right to publish the recipe here. It seems the user either failed to realize the difficulty of determining identity across the internet, or the user is pretending not to realize; we have, of course, no way to distinguish between these eminently plausible hypotheses without the aforementioned proof (or, improbably, proof to the contrary). --Pi zero (discusscontribs) 14:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
"There are specific instructions on how to provide evidence of ownership" where? the internet is a very big place and so is wikipedia and wikibooks. you say there are specific instructions, let me see them.

by the way, read the note on the food.com recipe and you'll see something else added that only the original recipe submitter could add which is "I also hereby grant myself permission to post this recipe to wikibooks as I already donated it to the public domain." Robert Dell (discusscontribs) 16:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Deletion[edit]

Wikimedia Commons logo Add a new entry

Pages that qualify for speedy deletion do not require discussion. This section is for discussing whether something belongs on Wikibooks or not for all other cases. Please give a reason and be prepared to defend it. Consensus is measured based on the strength of arguments not on numbers. Anyone can participate and everyone is encouraged to do so.

Please add a new request for deletion at the bottom of this section with a link to the page or book in the heading and a justification. Also place the {{rfd}} template at the top of the page you want deleted. If you are nominating an entire book, {{rfd}} goes on the top-level page, but not subpages. Nominations should cite relevant policy wherever possible.

US History/Vikings[edit]

Erik the Red and Leif Erikson are discussed in the section on European history. Erik's other children, and Snorri Sturluson, seem irrelevant. Pittsburgh Poet (discusscontribs) 22:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Are you nominating the whole page, or just two sections for deletion? Normally what to include or not in a book is decided through consensus by the book contributors on the book's or page's discussion page. --darklama 01:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I am nominating the orphaned chapter US History/Vikings under the section Orphans in "Discussion." I'll go to the book's discussion page, then. Thank you. Pittsburgh Poet (discusscontribs) 10:56, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

It's almost 4 years since the last contribution to that page (not sure how active other pages of the book are though) so you could make the edits as you see fit provided you explain your rationale in the Edit Summary. The fact that the information is already included elsewhere in the book seems a good enough reason.--ЗAНИA Flag of Estonia.svgtalk 20:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Cookbook:Recipes/Print version 0 to L[edit]

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Cookbook:Recipes/Print version M to Z[edit]

The following discussion has concluded. Please open a new discussion for any further comments.

Corset/Popular culture[edit]

A virtually random and pointless list of women wearing a particular garment. What educational purpose could this serve? —Justin (koavf)TCM 17:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Keep - The list is on topic and serves a purpose inside the work it belong to, this is not Wikipedia. --Panic (discusscontribs) 22:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC)