Wikibooks:Reading room/Administrative Assistance
From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection
| Assistance | Discussions | Requests | Proposals |
|---|---|---|---|
| General | Technical | Administrative (Usurps/Renaming) | General | Projects | Deletion | Undeletion | Import | Permissions | Features | Featured books | Policies/Guidelines |
|
Please title your request and sign your name and date (by adding four tildes thus: ~~~~. |
[edit] Page advertising
There have been several users that have had to be blocked infinitely by myself and others for creating pages that were a facade for advertising a link to various websites. I'd like to request a checkuser action be performed to determine if an IP range block will be effective in stopping this pattern. The users that I know of acting in this fashion include:
- User:Raja.ccs (deleted contribs)
- User:Cashgiftingmentor (deleted contribs)
- User:Jack4673 (deleted contribs)
- User:Loveforever199 (deleted contribs)
- User:Residualincomebusiness (deleted contribs)
-- Adrignola talk contribs 13:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- The similar content of the pages suggests a single source of the edits... I'd say circumstantial evidence supports a CU check to confirm and then allow a block. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 17:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- There are at least 3 IPs of different ranges, and at least 2 terminals being used. I'll poke around some more in a few hours, but it doesn't look good. --SB_Johnny talk 18:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Blocked the IPs, found more of these accounts doing the same thing on commons so please keep us informed if you see a similar pattern. --SB_Johnny talk 19:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Advertising www.puretravel.com
An anonymous user has been inserting link spam directing readers to a travel web site. (see Vietnam/Introduction_to_Vietnam & Talk:Vietnam/Introduction_to_Vietnam) Can this site be blacklisted? Recent Runes (talk) 12:15, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Uploader Right
I guess then we need to do some or all of the following:
- Agree and create a policy page (Wikibooks:uploader is a very basic start I've made)
- Agree how we will grant the uploader right... Is it like Editor (any Admin can make a judgement call) or after a full consensus debate at WB:RFP?
- Work out where contributers will request an upload... I'd prefer a page like WB:RFI rather than just a general "put a request in the reading room, but it's up for debate
- Decide what we are going to do as a policy with all the existing free content. I know some people have been moving it to Commons anyway, but is this a "policy" that we'll target moving it all. We'll inevitably create a whole load of image deletions by moving stuff and / or doing a fair use review as there's loads of stuff with incomplete data..
Do we want a project page somewhere to work on this (maybe the discussion page of Wikibooks talk:Uploader?
Unusual? Quite TalkQu 21:59, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
- Debate has moved to the "policy" talk page (thanks for fixing the link, hopeless on my part!) Unusual? Quite TalkQu 23:25, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] About user 74.173.164.178
The user has been engaged in the persistent vandalization of the Video Game Design/Introduction/Components, several Wikibookians have already attempted to stop the situation but it is ongoing, a hasher response seems appropriated. --Panic (talk) 06:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- I can only see three edits. I'll leave a note on the talk page. --Swift (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalization and spamm
204.249.125.6 it seems coordinated with Rhobday (and previous cases of vandalism). --Panic (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Panic. I left them warnings and deleted the inappropriate pages. More action as warranted. --Jomegat (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Fyi
Imo this vandal could well use a block: Special:Contributions/208.180.90.100. See also here. Regards, Wutsje (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)