Familial paragangliomas account for ~25% of cases, are often multiple and bilateral, and occur at an earlier age.
Mutations of the genes SDHD (previously known as PGL1), PGL2, and SDHC (previously PGL3) have been identified as causing familial head and neck paragangliomas.
Mutations of SDHB play an important role in familial adrenal pheochromocytoma and extra-adrenal paraganglioma (of abdomen and thorax), although there is considerable overlap in the types of tumors associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations.
Arise from the glomus cells, which are special chemoreceptors located along blood vessels that have a role in regulating blood pressure and blood flow.
The glomus cells are a part of the paraganglion system, composed of the extra-adrenal paraganglia of the autonomic nervous system, derived from the embryonic neural crest. Thus, paragangliomas are a type of neuroendocrine tumor, and are closely related to pheochromocytomas. Although all paragangliomas contain neurosecretory granules, only about 1-3% have clinical evidence of oversecretion.
According to the WHO classification of neuroendocrine tumors, paragangliomas are classified as having a neural cell line of origin. In the categorization proposed by Wick, the paragangliomas belong to Group II.
The main concentration of glomus cells are found are in the carotid body and the aortic bodies
Individual tumor cells are polygonal to oval and are arranged in distinctive cell balls, called Zellballen. These cell balls are separated by fibrovascular stroma and surrounded by sustenacular cells.
The paragangliomas appear grossly as sharply circumscribed polypoid masses and they have a firm to rubbery consistency. They are highly vascular tumors and may have a deep red color.
With IHC, the chief cells located in the cell balls are positive for chromogranin, synaptophysin, NSE, serotonin and neurofilamen; they are S-100 negative. The sustenacular cells are S-100 positive and focally positive for GFAP. By histochemistry, the paraganglioma cells are argyrophilic, PAS negative, mucicarmine negative, and argentaffin negative.
Paragangiomas are described by their site of origin and are often given special names:
Carotid paraganglioma (carotid body tumor): Is the most common of the head and neck paragangliomas. It usually presents as a painless neck mass, but larger tumors may cause cranial nerve palsies, usually of the vagus nerve and hypoglossal nerve.
Glomus tympanicum and Glomus jugulare: Both commonly present as a middle ear mass resulting in tinnitus (in 80%) and hearing loss (in 60%). The cranial nerves of the jugular foramen may be compressed, resulting swallowing difficulty.
Vagal paragangliomas: These are the least common of the head and neck paragangliomas. They usually present as a painless neck mass, but may result in dysphagia and hoarseness.
Other sites: Rare sites of involvement are the larynx, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, thyroid gland, and the thoracic inlet.
Typically considered slow-growing (estimated doubling time 4.2 years) benign tumors, <5% malignant potential
However, they are locally agressive neoplastic lesions, involving bony erosion and destruction of neurovascular structures
Commonly arise from the paraganglia of the jugular bulb
Typically invade the tympanic cavity and jugular foramen
Can extensively invade petroclival region
Can invade cavernous sinus above
Can invade hypoglossal canal below
Clinical presentation typically with tinnitus or hearing loss, but may also impact jugular foramen CNs
Small tumor involing jugular bulb, middle ear, and mastoid
Tumor extending under internal auditory canal; may have intracranial canal extension
Tumor extending into petrous apex; may have intracranial canal extension
Tumor extending beyond petrous apex; into clivus or infratemporal fossa
Tumor limited to the middle ear cleft
Tumor limited to the tympanomastoid area, with no infralabyrinthine involvement
Tumor invading infralabyrinthine compartment and petrous apex
Tumor with limited involvement of the vertical carotid canal
Tumor invading the vertical carotid canal
Tumor invading the horizontal carotid canal
Tumor with intracranial extension <2cm
Tumor with intracranial extension >2cm
Optimal treatment strategy is not clear, with multiple options:
Surgery: primary option if brainstem compression, or in young patients with functional CN loss. Surgical morbidity not insignificant
Fractionated RT: typical doses 45-55 Gy, mechanism of action likely related to fibrosis of feeding vessels and not direct glomus cell destruction. Complication rate low
SRS: No long-term experience yet, but appears a good option due to high conformality. RT dose typically ~16 Gy at 50% margin isodose. Typically ~1/3 have volume shrinkage, and ~2/3 no change, <10% further growth. Clinically ~50% may experience improvement
Embolization: typically considered an adjunctive treatment to surgery or RT. Not adequate alone due to poor tumor coverage and frequent re-vascularization
Verona, 2006 (Italy)(1996-2005) PMID 16955038 -- "Glomus jugulare tumors: the option of gamma knife radiosurgery." (Gerosa M, Neurosurgery. 2006 Sep;59(3):561-9; discussion 561-9.)
Retrospective. 20 patients (3 primary GKS, 8 recurrence post surgery, 11 recurrence after embolization). Average volume 7 cm3, mean marginal dose 17.3 Gy (13-24). Estimated doubling 4.2 years. Mean F/U 4.2 years
Outcome: Improved volume 40%, no change 55%
Toxicity: Improved CN function 25%, no neuro change 65%, hearing loss 10%
Conclusion: GKS effective, negligible side effects
Virginia, 2005PMID 15662818 -- "Gamma knife surgery for glomus jugulare tumors: an intermediate report on efficacy and safety." (Sheehan J, J Neurosurg. 2005 Jan;102 Suppl:241-6.)
Retrospective. 8 patients. Median margin dose 15 Gy (12-18). Median F/U 2.7 years
Meta-analysis, 2004 (1994-2004) PMID 15329019 -- "Comparison of radiosurgery and conventional surgery for the treatment of glomus jugulare tumors." (Gottfried ON, Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Aug 15;17(2):E4.)
7 surgical series 374 patients, 8 GKS series 142 patients. Mean F/U surgery 4.1 years, GKS 3.3 years
Outcome: local control surgery 92%, recurrence 3%; GKS decrease 36%, stable 61%, recurrence 2%
Toxicity: surgery CSF leak 8%, mortality 1.3%; GKS morbidity 8%, no mortality
Conclusion: Both treatments safe and efficacious; surgery higher morbidity but long term GKS outcomes unknown