Calculus/Integration techniques/Numerical Approximations
It is often the case, when evaluating definite integrals, that an antiderivative for the integrand cannot be found, or is extremely difficult to find. In some instances, a numerical approximation to the value of the definite value will suffice. The following techniques can be used, and are listed in rough order of ascending complexity.
Contents |
Riemann Sum [edit]
This comes from the definition of an integral. If we pick n to be finite, then we have:

where
is any point in the i-th sub-interval
on [a,b].
Right Rectangle [edit]
A special case of the Riemann sum, where we let
, in other words the point on the far right-side of each sub-interval on, [a,b]. Again if we pick n to be finite, then we have:

Left Rectangle [edit]
Another special case of the Riemann sum, this time we let
, which is the point on the far left side of each sub-interval on [a,b]. As always, this is an approximation when n is finite. Thus, we have:

Trapezoidal Rule [edit]
![\int_a^b f(x)\ dx \approx \frac{b-a}{2n}\left[f(x_0)+2\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(f(x_i))+f(x_n)\right]=\frac{b-a}{2n}(f(x_0) + 2f(x_1) + 2f(x_2) +\cdots+ 2f(x_{n-1}) + f(x_n))](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/c/c/ecc2ed787222b9b5b0a87b8cf9d217e2.png)
Simpson's Rule [edit]
Remember, n must be even,

![\approx \frac{b-a}{6n}\left[f(x_0)+\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\left((3-(-1)^{i})f(x_i)\right)+f(x_n)\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/6/b/c/6bc0e278038f98032e15c4bd8b110381.png)
![=\frac{b-a}{6n}\left[f(x_0)+4f(x_1/2)+2f(x_1)+4f(x_3/2)+\cdots+4f(x_{n-1/2})+f(x_n)\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/0/d/40d69b7ffce107bd73429e69667437b2.png)