Chemical Sciences: A Manual for CSIR-UGC National Eligibility Test for Lectureship and JRF/Peptide mass fingerprinting

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) (also known as protein fingerprinting) is an analytical technique for protein identification that was developed in 1993 by several groups independently.[1][2][3][4][5] In this method, the unknown protein of interest is first cleaved into smaller peptides, whose absolute masses can be accurately measured with a mass spectrometer such as MALDI-TOF or ESI-TOF.[6] These masses are then compared to either a database containing known protein sequences or even the genome. This is achieved by using computer programs that translate the known genome of the organism into proteins, then theoretically cut the proteins into peptides, and calculate the absolute masses of the peptides from each protein. They then compare the masses of the peptides of the unknown protein to the theoretical peptide masses of each protein encoded in the genome. The results are statistically analyzed to find the best match.
The advantage of this method is that only the masses of the peptides have to be known and as such, de novo peptide sequencing is not necessary which can be time consuming. A disadvantage is that the protein sequence has to be present in the database of interest. Additionally most PMF algorithms assume that the peptides come from a single protein.[7] The presence of a mixture can significantly complicate the analysis and potentially compromise the results. Typical for the PMF based protein identification is the requirement for an isolated protein. Mixtures exceeding a number of 2-3 proteins typically require the additional use of MS/MS based protein identification to achieve sufficient specificity of identification (6). Therefore, the typical PMF samples are isolated proteins from Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D gels) or isolated SDS-PAGE bands. Additional analyses by MS/MS can either be direct, e.g., MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis or downstream nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of gel spot eluates.[7][8][9]

Sample preparation[edit | edit source]

Protein samples can be derived from SDS-PAGE[7] and are then subject to some chemical modifications. Disulfide bridges in proteins are reduced and cysteine amino acids are carboxymethylated chemically or acrylamidated during the gel electrophoresis.

Then the proteins are cut into several fragments using proteolytic enzymes such as trypsin, chymotrypsin or Glu-C. A typical sample:protease ratio is 50:1. The proteolysis is typically carried out overnight and the resulting peptides are extracted with acetonitrile and dried under vacuum. The peptides are then dissolved in a small amount of distilled water and are ready for mass spectrometric analysis.

Mass spectrometric analysis[edit | edit source]

The digested protein can be analyzed with different types of mass spectrometers such as ESI-TOF or MALDI-TOF. MALDI-TOF is often the preferred instrument because it allows a high sample throughput and several proteins can be analyzed in a single experiment - if complemented by MS/MS analysis.

A small fraction of the peptide (usually 1 microliter or less) is pipetted onto a MALDI target and a chemical called a matrix is added to the peptide mix. The matrix molecules are required for the desorption of the peptide molecules. Matrix and peptide molecules co-crystallize on the MALDI target and are ready to be analyzed.

The target is inserted into the vacuum chamber of the mass spectrometer and the analysis of peptide masses is initiated by a pulsed laser beam which transfers high amounts of energy into the matrix molecules. The energy transfer is sufficient to promote the transition of matrix molecules and peptides from the solid state into the gas state. Then the molecules become accelerated in the electric field of the mass spectrometer and fly towards an ion detector where their arrival is detected as an electric signal. Their mass is proportional to their time of flight (TOF) in the drift tube and can be calculated accordingly.

Computational analysis[edit | edit source]

The mass spectrometrical analysis produces a list of molecular weights which is often called peak list. The peptide masses are now compared to huge databases such as Swissprot, Genbank which contain protein sequence information. Software programs (see web resources and references in Hufnagel, 2006[9]) cut all these proteins into peptides with the same enzyme used in the chemical cleavage (for example trypsin). The absolute mass of all these peptides is then theoretically calculated. A comparison is made between the peak list of measured peptide masses and all the masses from the calculated peptides. The results are statistically analyzed and possible matches are returned in a results table.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Pappin DJ, Hojrup P, Bleasby AJ (1993). "Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting". Curr. Biol. 3 (6): 327–32. doi:10.1016/0960-9822(93)90195-T. PMID 15335725. 
  2. Henzel WJ, Billeci TM, Stults JT, Wong SC, Grimley C, Watanabe C (1993). "Identifying proteins from two-dimensional gels by molecular mass searching of peptide fragments in protein sequence databases". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 (11): 5011–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.11.5011. PMID 8506346. 
  3. Mann M, Højrup P, Roepstorff P (1993). "Use of mass spectrometric molecular weight information to identify proteins in sequence databases". Biol. Mass Spectrom. 22 (6): 338–45. doi:10.1002/bms.1200220605. PMID 8329463. 
  4. James P, Quadroni M, Carafoli E, Gonnet G (1993). "Protein identification by mass profile fingerprinting". Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 195 (1): 58–64. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1993.2009. PMID 8363627. 
  5. Yates JR, Speicher S, Griffin PR, Hunkapiller T (1993). "Peptide mass maps: a highly informative approach to protein identification". Anal. Biochem. 214 (2): 397–408. doi:10.1006/abio.1993.1514. PMID 8109726. 
  6. Clauser KR, Baker P, Burlingame AL (1999). "Role of accurate mass measurement (+/- 10 ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS/MS and database searching". Anal. Chem. 71 (14): 2871–82. doi:10.1021/ac9810516. PMID 10424174. 
  7. a b c Shevchenko A, Jensen ON, Podtelejnikov AV, Sagliocco F, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mortensen P, Shevchenko A, Boucherie H, Mann M (1996). "Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (25): 14440–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.25.14440. PMID 8962070. 
  8. Wang W, Sun J, Nimtz M, Deckwer WD, Zeng AP (2003). "Protein identification from two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae by combined use of mass spectrometry data and raw genome sequences". Proteome Science 1 (1): 6. doi:10.1186/1477-5956-1-6. PMID 14653859. 
  9. a b Hufnagel P, Rabus R (2006). "Mass spectrometric identification of proteins in complex post-genomic projects. Soluble proteins of the metabolically versatile, denitrifying 'Aromatoleum' sp. strain EbN1". J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11 (1-2): 53–81. doi:10.1159/000092819. PMID 16825790.