Jump to content

How to Ace FYLSE/Torts MCQ

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Products Liability

[edit | edit source]

Egg skull P was injured by D’s product sold by S. The warning on the label was inadequate.

In Negligence P v. D, D wins under if:

(A) P didn’t read the label.
(B) The injury was not reasonably foreseeable by D.
(C) 3rd P made the product.
(D) D didn’t know P was egg skull

Products Liability

[edit | edit source]

Egg skull P was injured by D’s product sold by S. The warning on the product label was inadequate.

In SL P v. D, P wins if:

(A) D is negligent.
(B) possibility of Injury well known (I)
(C) consumer expectation test is met.
(D) possibility of Injury well known (II)

Products Liability

[edit | edit source]

Egg skull P was injured by D’s product sold by S. The product label said safe for normal person.

In P v. S, P wins if:

(A) manufacturer’s negligence equals commercial supplier’s.
(B) defective
(C) breached express warranty.
(D) breached a duty

Negligence

[edit | edit source]

P was at D's house and C injured P.

In negligence P v. D, P wins if:

(A) D knew it's unsafe.
(B) P knew it's unsafe.
(C) P was invitee of D
(D) A crime occurred recently.

Misrepresentation

[edit | edit source]

D hide a fact to P.

In misrepresentation P v. D, who wins?

(A) D, b/c P thought it was.
(B) D, b/c P permitted.
(C) P, b/c P breached the duty to disclose.
(D) P, if D had a duty to disclose.