Patsho/Polity
 |
Was this page created by accident or as a test? Please improve the educational quality of this page, and clarify what the intentions are on the discussion page so other people may contribute. The page might be able to remain at Wikibooks after 7 days when further development is likely.
Additional comments: scope unclear, content is confusing, and seems like it might have been machine translated?
Please consider notifying the author(s) with {{subst:Query notice|Patsho/Polity|~~~~}} |
Introduction[edit | edit source]
The political governance prevalent in ancient Patsho can be visualized through folktales and folklore.
Actors in governance[edit | edit source]
The elders in the village were the main actors in governance. Other actors involved in governance are the acquired individuals through skills in battle. The decision makers were the elders or more knowledgeable personage on cultural roots and the dictum they offered remains impeccably legitimate. The decision to raid villages or war declaration depends on the individual who is considered knowledgeable socially accepted personage to lead the community.
Institutions in governance[edit | edit source]
The Murong was a part of the governance, which is considered as a youth dormitory. It was a significant learning institution where the menfolk were morally and physically trained for security and related education was imparted sustenance.
Governance in Safeguarding and commerce[edit | edit source]
The other effective aspects of governance that deals with safeguarding forest and rearing livestock has been fundamentally executed in the past and present. The discharge of trade and commerce based upon the primitive barter system was materialized in the village or between villages.
Governance in adjudication[edit | edit source]
The legal remedies and the social legislation or the concept of punishment upon evil doers were performed to the extent of unexplainable imposition.