From the preceding chapters, you should be able to read and perhaps produce sentences like the following:
Eytukanìl tskot alor Neytiriru toleiìng.
"Eytukan gave the beautiful bow to Neytiri, I’m happy to say."
Eytukan-ìl tsko-it a-lor Neytiri-ru t‹ol›‹ei›ìng (name)-erg bow-acc attr-pretty (name)-dat give‹pfv›‹approb›
The word order may change depending on the relative relevance of the participants, deference on the part of the speaker, and the like, as will be covered in the chapter on Discourse; if the adjective moves, it may of course become lora. However, much more complex sentences than this are possible in Na’vi, and that is the subject of this chapter.
Negation, both of noun phrases and of clauses, is made with the negating particle ke, which appears before the negated element. Na’vi utilizes multiple negation, like ke lu kawtu "there isn't no-one" (= there isn't anyone / there is no-one):
fì-ketuwong ke n‹ay›ume ke-’u this-alien not learn‹fut› no-thing
- "This alien will learn nothing."[note 1]
The vowel e elides in certain lexicalized expressions, such as kawtu "no-one" above and kawkrr "never". A longer form, kehe, is used as an interjection when answering "no" rather than negating a noun or verb. Whereas ke only occurs before the word or phrase it modifies, the adjectival forms kea and ake may occur before or after a noun: kea säfpìl or säfpìl ake "no idea".
In the case of zene "must", there are two negative constructions. "Mustn't (be obliged not to)" is zenke, whereas the opposite order, ke zene "don't have to" merely indicates a lack of obligation. Both take the subjunctive:
- Nga zenke kivä! "You must not go!"
- Nga ke zene kivä. "You don't have to go."
Double negation does not (necessarily) hold across multiple clauses. In a following section, for example, the sentence
- Ke fparmìl oel futa lu tute a tsun nì-Na’vi set fìfya pivlltxe!
- "I didn't think that there was anyone who could speak Na’vi like this!"
is only negated in its independent clause, "I didn't think".
Various other particles such as conjunctions join phrases and clauses. Examples are sì and últe "and", fu "or", slä "but", na "like, as" (na ayoeng "as we (do), like us"),[note 2] san (quote), sìk (unquote), fte "so that, in order to", fteke "lest". A is used for relative clauses, as in tute a tsun "a.person who can",[note 3] futa means "that" after a transitive verb, as in ke fparmìl futa ... "(I) didn't think that ...", fwa means "that" after an intransitive verb, as in law lu oeru fwa ... "It's clear to me that ...", and tsnì means "that" in ätxäle si tsnì ... "(I) request that ...".
The difference between sì "and" and últe "and" is that sì joins phrases within a clause, while últe joins clauses. Attested examples include trrä sì txonä "of day and night", win sì txur "fast and strong", and plltxe sì tìran "to speak and walk", but kìyevame ulte Eywa ngahu "See you again, and may Eywa be with you".
Sì may also cliticize to the second noun phrase, as in the formal inclusive pronouns, or in
- aylì’ut horentisì lì’fyayä leNa’vi
- "(describe) the words and rules of the Na’vi language"
ay-lì’-’u-it ay+koren-ti-sì lì’-fya-yä le-Na’vi pl-say-thing-acc pl+rule-acc-and say-way-gen adj-People
Note that the accusative suffix -it/ti is attached to both conjoined nouns aylì'u and horen, and that the genitive lì'fyayä "the language's (words and rules)" governs both.
The simple conjunction for "or" is fu. However, when the meaning is that either of two choices is equally acceptable or unacceptable, or that the speaker doesn't care which it is, the construction A, B, ke tsranten "(either) A (or) B, it doesn't matter" is used:
- Yola krr, txana krr, ke tsranten.
- "It doesn’t matter how long it takes."
The conjunction slä "but" joins two clauses,
- Zìsìt((o)) amrr ftolia ohe, slä zene fko niyevume nìtxan.
- "I studied for five years but there is much still to learn."
zìsìt-((o)) a-mrr ft‹ol›ia ohe slä zene fko n‹iyev›ume nì-txan year-? attr-five study‹pfv› I.form but must one learn‹fut.sjv› adv-much
whereas the adverb ngián "however" does not:
- Aylì’u ngian nì’it skepek lu.
- "But you sound rather formal." (lit. "[your] words, however, are a bit formal.")
Na’vi does not have a special infinitive form of the verb, like "to speak" in "teach him to speak". Instead, fte "so that" is used with the subjunctive. There are several examples below.
Quoted speech is introduced with the quotative particle san and the unquotative particle sìk. Na’vi only allows direct speech, not indirect (reported) speech; that is, "He said, 'I will go'," but not "He said he would go." If the quotation occurs at either end of the sentence, then only one of the particles need be used:
- Poltxe oe, san zene ke uniltìranyu ke’uziva’u fìtseng.
p‹ol›lltxe oe san zene ke unil-tìran-yu ke-’u z‹iv›a’u fì-tseng. say‹pfv› I quot must not dream-walk-er no-one come‹sjv› this-place
- "I have said, [quote] 'No avatar may come here'."
Here the end of the quotation is obvious, as the speaker finished speaking. However, if it occurs in the middle, so that there is non-reported material on either side, then both particles occur together as correlatives:
- Poltxe Eytukan san oe kayä sìk, slä oel pot ke spaw.
p‹ol›lltxe Eytukan san oe k‹ay›ä sìk slä oe-l po-t ke spaw say‹pfv› (name) quot I go‹fut› unquot but I-erg s/he-acc not believe
- "Eytukan said he would go (lit. 'I will go'), but I don't believe him."
Practically speaking, however, an initial quote may still need san, as otherwise the audience might not realize that it's reported speech; it would require a context that makes that obvious before the first particle could be dropped.
These particles can also be used for the words that make up thoughts. Because the quotation is retained verbatim, speakers may end up referring to themselves in the second or third person. For instance, if someone named Ateyo had been unable to respond to someone's questions, he might say,
- Rä’ä fpivìl san oeyä sìpawmìri Ateyo ke new oeru ’iveyng sìk.
rä’ä fp‹iv›ìl san oe-yä ay+tì-pawm-ìri Ateyo ke new oe-ru ’‹iv›eyng sìk don't think‹sjv› quote I-gen pl+nomz-ask-top (name) not want I-dat respond‹sjv› unquote
- "Don't think that I don't want to respond to your questions." (Lit. 'Don't think, "Ateyo doesn't want to respond to me about my questions".')
The word "whether" is used for indirect questions, and so like other wh- words is not translated directly; since it's used for yes-no questions, the Na’vi equivalent is san srake ... sìk. That is, for "he asked whether they went", say polawm po san srake fo holum sìk (or whatever the actual wording was) "he asked, 'Did they go?'".
One construction in Na’vi is equivalent to an indirect question in English, "tell me whether (or not)",
- Piveng oer ftxey nga new rivey fuke.
- "Tell me if you want to live."
Some of the subordinating conjunctions, such as those indicating purpose, trigger the subjunctive in a dependent clause:
- Sáwtute zerá’u fte fol Kélutralti skiva’á.
- "The humans are coming to (that they may) destroy Hometree."
saw-tute z‹er›a’u fte fo-l kel-utral-ti sk‹iv›a’a pl+sky-person come‹ipfv› so.that pl+s/he-erg home-tree-acc destroy‹sjv›
However, the independent clause is not always made explicit:
- Txo new nga rivey, oehu!
- "(Come) with me if you want to live."
txo new nga r‹iv›ey oe-hu if want you to.live‹sjv› me-with
This can result in strings of subjunctive clauses:
- Nga sänume sivi poru fte tsivun pilvlltxe sì tivìran na ayoeng.
- "You will teach him so that he may speak and walk as we do."
nga sä-nume s‹iv›i po-ru fte ts‹iv›un p‹i‹ol›v›lltxe sì t‹iv›ìran na ay-oe-nga you nomz-learn do-sjv him-dat so.that be.able‹sjv› converse‹sjv‹pfv›› and walk‹sjv› like pl-I-you
Here the first verb, sivi, is subjunctive as a polite command, the second, tsivun, as the intended consequence of that command after fte ("teach him so that he may be able to), and the other two as dependents of the modal tsun.
- "a person who can speak Na’vi"
It wouldn't matter if the phrase were "a thing which" (or "that"), "a time when", "a reason why", or "a place where"; all would use the same particle a to translate the English wh- word:
po (tsa-ne) k‹arm›ä a tsenge-t ke ts‹ìm›e’a oe-l s/he it-to go‹past.ipfv› sbrd place-acc not see‹rec› I-erg
- "I didn't see where she was going" (lit. "I didn't see the place to which she was going")[note 5]
This a is the same morpheme as the a in attributive adjectives; indeed, relative clauses can be thought of as multi-word adjectives: The examples above might be more literally translated as "an able-to-speak-Na’vi person" and "a she-was-going-to-it place", with "able to speak Na’vi" and "she was going to it" being attributives (≈ adjectives). Indeed, attributive adjectives are simply reduced, one-word relative clauses;
- sìltsana tìpawm "a good question"
is just a reduced form of
- lu sìltsan a tìpawm "a question which is good".
Relative clauses are also similar in meaning to the participle:
- Palulukan atusaron lu lehrrap.
- "A hunting thanator is dangerous."
- Palulukan a teraron lu lehrrap.
- "A thanator that's hunting is dangerous."
A slightly more complex example of a relative clause is,
- ’Awpot set ftxey ayngal a l-ayngakip, ’awpot a Na’viru yomtìyìng.
- "Choose one among you (that is, 'one who is among you'), one who will feed the People."
’awpo-t set ftxey ay-nga-l a lu ay-nga-kip, ’awpo-t a Na’vi-ru yom+t‹ìy›ìng one-acc now choose pl-you-erg sbrd be pl-you-among one-acc sbrd People-dat eat+give‹imm›
- (Lit, "you-all choose an is-among-you individual, a will-feed-the-People individual")
Here, in ’awpot a Na’viru yomtìyìng "one who will feed the People", the attributive a is not adjacent to the verb, and so cannot be attached to it in writing the way it is attached to adjectives.
The attributive a is also used when a prepositional phrase modifies a noun. In English, "the cat in the hat" can be thought of as "the cat which is in the hat", with the verb 'to be' dropped. In Na'vi, though the 'be' need not be said, the a 'which' must be:
- Fìpo lu vrrtep a mìsokx atsleng
- "It is a demon in a false body"
Similarly, mesyalhu a ikran "a banshee with (-hu) two wings".
In cases where English uses a stranded preposition, as in "someone to talk with", Na’vi needs to repeat the noun or a pronoun:
- Ke lu kawtu a nulnivew oe pohu tireapivängkxo äo Utral Aymokriyä.
- "There’s nobody I’d rather commune with under the Tree of Voices"
ke lu ke-’aw-tu a nì-ul-n‹iv›ew oe po-hu tirea-p‹iv›ängkxo äo utral ay-mokri-yä not be not-a-one sbrd adv-more-want‹sjv› I him/her-with spirit-converse‹sjv› under tree pl-voice-gen
Or literally, "There isn't nobody that I'd more like to commune with them under the Tree of Voices." Similarly,
- Po tsane karmä a tsengit ke tsìme’a oel.
po tsa-ne k‹arm›ä a tsenge-it ke ts‹ìm›e’a oe-ìl she it-to go‹past.ipfv› sbrd place-acc not see‹rec› I-erg
- "I didn't see where she was going."
Or literally, "I didn't see the place that she went to it." The tsane could be dropped, though with a bit of ambiguity, as it would no longer be completely clear that the place was her destination.
When a subject or object in the relative clause refers to the noun that it modifies, then it can be dropped:
- tsayerikit tolaron a tute "the person who hunted that hexapede" (it's not required to say in full pol tsayerikit tolaron a tute "the person who he hunted that hexapede")
- fìtutel tolaron a yerik "the hexapede which this person hunted" (rather than fìtutel pot tolaron a yerik "the hexapede which this person hunted it")
However, a noun in the dative or other case may not be dropped, though normally converted to a pronoun:
- lu poru mesyal a ikran "a banshee that has two wings" (lit. 'a banshee which to it there are two wings'), not *mesyal lu a ikran or *mesyal a ikran.
Relative clauses with empty nouns
In the previous examples, the relative clause modified a pronoun, fì’u "this", which did little except to anchor the relative clause. By inflecting the pronoun for case, this allows the relative clause to play various roles in the sentence. For example, the pronoun may be in the accusative, fì’ut, which when followed by a plays the role of "that" in "I think that [X]":
- Ke fparmìl oel futa lu tute a tsun nì-Na’vi set fìfya pivlltxe!
- "I didn't think that there was anyone who could speak Na’vi like that at this point!"
ke fp‹arm›ìl oe-l fì-’u-t=a lu tute a tsun nì-Na’vi set fì-fya p‹iv›lltxe not think‹past.ipfv› I-erg this-thing-acc=sbrd be person sbrd be.able adv-Na’vi now this-way speak‹sjv›
- (Lit. "I didn't think this [X] thing", where [X] is "there is a can-now-thus-speak-Na’vi person".)
As an accusative form, futa is used with an ergative agent when the main verb is transitive. With an intransitive clause, the form would be fwa, a contraction of fì’u-a.
- Law lu oeru fwa nga mì reltseo nolume nìtxan!
- "It's clear to me that you've learned a lot in art."
law lu oe-ru fì-’u-a nga mì rel-tseo n‹ol›ume nì-txan clear be I-dat this-thing-attr you in image-art learn‹pfv› adv-great
Tsnì is also used with an intransitive main verb such as sìlpey "to hope" or noun + si :
- Ätxäle si tsnì livu oheru Uniltaron.
- "I (respectfully) request (that I have) the Initiation."
(If the "I" were spoken here, it would be of the form oe.)
Both the tsnì and the subjunctive may be dropped, in which case a clause like "I hope" functions as a discourse particle, coordinate to the adjacent clause:
- Sìlpey oe, layu oeru ye’rìn sìltsana fmawn a tsun oe ayngaru tivìng.
- "I hope I will soon have good news to give you."
sìlpey oe hope I l‹ay›u oe-ru ye’rìn sìltsan-a fmawn a tsun oe ay-nga-ru t‹iv›ìng be‹fut› I-dat soon good-attr news sbrd can I pl-you-dat give‹sjv›
Other small grammatical words than pronouns may head the relative clause. One of them, krr "time", behaves as an adverb in that it does not take case endings to show its relationship to the main verb:
- Tìeyngit oel tolel a krr, ayngaru payeng.
- "When I get an answer, I'll tell you."
tì-eyng-it oe-l t‹ol›el a krr ay-nga-ru p‹ay›eng nomz-to.answer-acc I-erg receive‹pfv› sbrd time pl-you-dat tell‹fut›
Note that the verb 'get' is perfective, even though it is not in the past, as I do not plan on telling you until the event of getting the answer is complete.
Such subordinating words may also appear at the beginning of a sentence:
- Fwa sute pxel nga tsun oeyä hì’ia tìngopit sivar fte pivlltxe nìlor fìtxan oeru teya si.
fì’u-a ay+tute pxel nga tsun oe-yä hì’i-a tì-ngop-it s‹iv›ar fte p‹iv›lltxe nì-lor fì-txan oe-ru teya si this-sbrd pl-person like you can I-gen little-attr nomz-create-acc use‹sjv› so.that speak‹sjv› adv-beautiful this-much I-dat full make
- "I'm glad that people like you can use my little creation to speak so beautifully."
Here the independent clause is fì'u oeru teya si "this fills me (with joy)".
Combined with the adposition hu "(together) with", this fwa translates the English conjunction "although", and similar expressions based on tsafya "that way" the conjunction "however (whichever way)". However, "however" in the sense "but" (as in this sentence) is a separate word, ngian, as noted above.
- The lack of case marking is yet to be explained.
- Also aylì’u na ayskxé mì te’lán "the words (are) like stones in my heart"
- This a is just the attributive a used for adjectives, used with tsun "be able" to form an attributive verb.
- Na’vi pe forms are only used to ask questions
- The word tsane "to that" may be dropped out, for a more colloquial po karmä a tsenget ke tsìme’a oel.
- "Questions Answered: Invented Languages", New York Times, March 10, 2010
- Transcribed from sound recording in the New York Times Magazine
- "We Translate Your Phrases into Na'vi", UGO Movie Blog, December 23, 2009
- "Calling All 'Avatar' Fanatics — How to Say 'I Love You' in Na'vi", lemondrop, 2010 Jan 26