Homological Algebra/Printable version

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Homological Algebra

The current, editable version of this book is available in Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection, at
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Homological_Algebra

Permission is granted to copy, distribute, and/or modify this document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

Defintion of abelian category

Definition (-enriched category):

An -enriched category is a category such that:

  1. , is an abelian group.
  2. , is bilinear.

Definition (zero object):

A zero object is an object in an -enriched category that is both initial and terminal. We usually denote it by .

Definition (biproduct):

Given an -enriched category , a biproduct of is a tuple such that:

We usually denote by .

Definition (additive category):

An additive category is an -enriched category such that:

  1. There is a zero product in .
  2. Every has a biproduct.

Definition ((co-)kernel):

Given in an -enriched category. A (co-)kernel of is a (co-)equalizer of and .

Definition (abelian category):

An abelian category is an additive category where:

  1. Every morphism has a kernel and cokernel.
  2. Every monomorphism is a kernel and every epimorphism is a cokernel.

Example:

The category of all left -modules of a ring is an abelian category.

Exercises[edit | edit source]

  1. Given in an -enriched category with zero object. Prove that iff factors through .
  1. Given a biproduct of and . Prove that is a coproduct of and and is a product of and .
  1. In an -enriched category with zero object, a kernel of can be equivalently be characterized as a pullback of along .


Sequences

Lemma: In an -enriched category, if is a kernel, is a cokernel of , then is a kernel of .

Proof: Let be a kernel of . Since , and is a cokernel of , there exists such that . For all such that , . Since is a kernel of , factorizes uniquely through .

Corollary: In an abelian category, consider a sequence . The following conditions are equivalent:

  1. is a cokernel of and is a kernel of .
  2. is a monomorphism and is a cokernel of .
  3. is an epimorphism and is a kernel of .

Definition (short exact sequence):

We call a short exact sequence if it satisfies any of the equivalent conditions above.

Proposition (splitting lemma):

Let be an abelian category, and suppose that

is a short exact sequence. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. There exists a morphism so that
  2. There exists a morphism so that
  3. The short exact sequence is isomorphic to the short exact sequence

Proof: Suppose first that is isomorphic to via isomorphisms , and . Then there exists as in 1., since we may just define

;

has the required property since by definition of morphisms of chain complexes, , and further . Suppose now that there does exist so that . Since is a biproduct, it is in particular a product, so that and define a unique morphism such that

and .

Then, , together with the identities on and , yields an isomorphism of chain complexes. The equivalence of 2. and 3. is a dual statement to the equivalence of 1. and 3., whence it doesn't have to be proved separately.