Handbook of Genetic Counseling/Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention
Appearance
Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention
Background
[edit | edit source]- Colorectal Cancer
- Second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in US
- Estimated 56,000 people die annually
- Surgical resection and chemotherapy or radiation are standard treatment procedures
- Lifetime risks for colorectal cancer
- General population 5%
- Family history of adenoma or CRC 15-20%
- HNPCC 80%
- FAP approaches 100%
- Annual incidence 130,000
- When detected and treated while still localized 5 year survival exceeds 90%
- Only 40% of cancers diagnosed while still localized
- Current screening recommendations include:
- Annual fecal occult blood testing
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years
- Colonoscopy every 10 years or double contrast barium enema every 5-10 years
- Second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in US
- Chemoprevention
- Use of natural or pharmacologic agents to halt, reverse, or delay carcinogenesis
- Mechanisms to protect against mutagens
- Inhibit uptake or activation
- Enhance DNA repair of apoptosis
- Modulate cellular activities
- Signal transduction
- Growth factor activity
- Hormonal activity
- Immune response
- DNA methylation
- Development of chemotherapeutics
- Goal is to achieve an acceptable therapeutic index
- Therapeutic index is risk to benefit ratio
- Want benefits of chemoprevention to greatly outweigh risks
- Important for all therapeutic agents, but particularly those used for prevention
- Prevention of cancer may require years of therapy
- Therapeutic index is risk to benefit ratio
- Four considerations in development
- Therapeutic regimen
- Dose
- Duration
- Route of administration
- Side effects
- Mechanistic specificity
- Agents ability to provide therapeutic development without affecting other pathways in body
- Reduces number of side effects
- Combinations with other chemotherapeutics
- Therapeutic regimen
- Goal is to achieve an acceptable therapeutic index
- Chemoprevention in colon cancer
- Alternative approach to screening to reduce mortality from colorectal cancer
- Directed at preventing development of polyps that have potential to progress to colon cancer
- Agents interfere with genetic alterations that lead to development of adenomas or their progression to cancer
- Evaluation of chemotherapeutic effectiveness
- Enhanced by increasing understanding of molecular events in carcinogenesis
- Rely on different types of studies
- Epiemiological
- Animal studies
- Mechanisms of action of agents
- Controlled clinical trials
- Measures of efficacy
- Difficult to determine what intermediate clinical events correlate with long term benefits
- Long term benefits
- Reduction in cancer incidence
- Reduction in cancer mortality
- Fewer or less invasive surveillance
- Clinical measurements
- Regression, suppression, and prevention of adenomas
- Examine adenoma number, size, burden, histopathology, cellular/molecular characteristics
- Long term benefits
- Trials usually are performed on only one risk cohort and may not apply to other cohorts or general population
- FAP
- HNPCC
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Personal or family history of colorectal cancer
- General population
- Difficult to determine what intermediate clinical events correlate with long term benefits
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
[edit | edit source]- Inhibit cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)
- Catalytic enzymes that convert arachidonic acid into prostanoids
- Non-selective inhibitors inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2
- Selective inhibitors inhibit only COX-2
- Inhibiting COX enzymes causes increase in arachidonic acid
- Stimulates conversion of sphingomyelin to ceramide
- Ceramide induces apoptosis
- Apoptosis may also occur due to alterations in prostaglandin production and a decrease in angiogenic factors
- May also have COX-independent chemopreventive activities
- Inhibit COX-1 by irreversible acetylation
- Constitutively expressed in most epithelial cell types
- Plays role in cytoprotection
- Inhibition of COX-1 in GI tract can cause ulceration and bleeding
- Not involved in colon carcinogenesis
- Inhibit COX-2 by competitive inhibition
- Little basal expression in cells
- Induced by cytokines, mitogens, and growth factors
- Expression induced by cytokines, mitogens, and growth factors
- Overexpression may promote proliferation, inhibit apoptosis, and promote angiogenesis
- Little basal expression in cells
- Catalytic enzymes that convert arachidonic acid into prostanoids
- Includes aspirin, sulindac, celecoxib, and rofecoxib
- Aspirin
- Case-control studies
- Show 40-50% reduction in risk of colonic adenomas or colorectal cancer
- Studies done on members of general population
- Randomized controlled trial
- Only one has been completed
- Analyzed men in cohort examining the effects of aspirin on coronary artery disease
- Found no significant difference in risk of developing adenomas or cancer with use or aspirin
- Men were taking very low dose - may be a threshold dose that was not achieved in this study
- Benefit seems to be greatest in people taking aspirin consistently for many years
- Case-control studies
- Sulindac
- Non-specific COX inhibitor
- Observational and randomized trials
- Studied patients with FAP
- Showed substantial reduction in size and number of polyps
- Increase in number and size of polyps noted three months after sulindac
Discontinued
- Development of new colorectal carcinoma reported in patient with FAP while taking sulindac
- Randomized trial of primary chemoprevention
- Double-blind, placebo controlled
- Found sulindac did not slow development of adenomas in patients with FAP
- Found no significant difference in number of polyps between groups
- Celecoxib
- Selective COX-2 inhibitor
- Randomized controlled trial
- Showed regression of polyps in patients with FAP by 28%
- Insufficient information about long-term effects
- Only agent approved by FDA for treatment of adenomatous polyps
- Risks of NSAIDs
- Non-selective NSAIDs can cause ulceration and bleeding in GI tract
- Concern about risk of cardiovascular effects of COX-2 inhibitors
- Possible prothrombotic potential of COX-2 inhibitors
- Important to assess long term effects because may require years of treatment
- Future of NSAIDs
- Current studies looking at celecoxib and related COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib
- Studies comparing effects of aspirin with selective COX-2 inhibitors
- Development and testing of NO-releasing NSAIDs that may be safer and more effective than traditional NSAIDs
Other Chemopreventive Agents
[edit | edit source]- DFMO (a-difluoromethylornithine)
- Irreversible inhibitor of enzyme ornithine decarboxylase (ODC)
- ODC is enzyme involved in biosynthesis of polyamines
- Polyamines are promoters of cell proliferation
- ODC activity and polyamine levels significantly elevated in colorectal adenomas and cancers compared to normal tissues
- Phase II clinical trials in 1980's
- Pulled due to limited efficacy
- Severe side effects noted
- Thrombocytopenia
- Nausea and vomiting
- Abdominal pain
- Diarrhea
- Reversible hearing loss
- Recent early trials show DFMO may be effective at low doses
- Dose-limiting ototoxicity only side effect
- Now being tested in Phase II/III trials in those at risk for colorectal, bladder, or skin cancer
- May have additive effect when used with COX inhibitors
- Irreversible inhibitor of enzyme ornithine decarboxylase (ODC)
- Folate
- Individuals with high dietary folate intake have lower incidence of colorectal cancer
- Greatest benefit if using supplements
- May require years of use for benefit to be seen
- Mechanism of action unknown
- Individuals with high dietary folate intake have lower incidence of colorectal cancer
- Calcium
- Some studies show supplements decrease proliferation of colorectal epithelium
- Within one year of use
- Dose required to see effect still unknown
- May inhibit carcinogenesis by binding bile acids and fatty acids in bowel lumen
- Some studies show supplements decrease proliferation of colorectal epithelium
- Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT)
- May provide 20% reduction in risk for colorectal cancer
- Estrogens may decrease production of secondary bile acids by decreasing insulin-like growth factor I
- Vitamins, antioxidants, fiber
- Data from prospective studies show no effect in rate of adenoma formation with vitamin or antioxidant supplements
- Studies show very weak protective effect of increased dietary fiber
Notes
[edit | edit source]The information in this outline was last updated in 2002.