Canadian Criminal Sentencing/Offences/Impaired Driving, Over 80 and Refusal
|Impaired Driving, Over 80 and Refusal|
|s. 254 253, 254 of the Crim. Code|
|Election / Plea|
|Jurisdiction||Prov. Court |
SC Judge + PI (I)
SC Jury + PI (I) (536(2))
|Minimum||$1,000 + |
12 months Driving Prohib.(first)
30 days jail + 2 to 5 years Driving Prohib. (second)
120 days +
3 or more years Driving Prohib. (three or more)
|Maximum||18 months jail or $5,000 fine|
|Avail. Disp.||same as summary|
|Minimum||same as summary|
|Maximum||5 years jail|
|Offence Elements |
Legislation[edit | edit source]
255. (1) Every one who commits an offence under section 253 or 254 is guilty of an indictable offence or an offence punishable on summary conviction and is liable,
- (a) whether the offence is prosecuted by indictment or punishable on summary conviction, to the following minimum punishment, namely,
- (i) for a first offence, to a fine of not less than $1,000,
- (ii) for a second offence, to imprisonment for not less than 30 days, and
- (iii) for each subsequent offence, to imprisonment for not less than 120 days;
- (b) where the offence is prosecuted by indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; and
- (c) if the offence is punishable on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term of not more than 18 months.
(4) A person who is convicted of an offence committed under section 253 or subsection 254(5) is, for the purposes of this Act, deemed to be convicted for a second or subsequent offence, as the case may be, if they have previously been convicted of
- (a) an offence committed under either of those provisions;
- (b) an offence under subsection (2) or (3); or
- (c) an offence under section 250, 251, 252, 253, 259 or 260 or subsection 258(4) of this Act as this Act read immediately before the coming into force of this subsection.
(5) Notwithstanding subsection 730(1), a court may, instead of convicting a person of an offence committed under section 253, after hearing medical or other evidence, if it considers that the person is in need of curative treatment in relation to his consumption of alcohol or drugs and that it would not be contrary to the public interest, by order direct that the person be discharged under section 730 on the conditions prescribed in a probation order, including a condition respecting the person’s attendance for curative treatment in relation to that consumption of alcohol or drugs. *[Note: In force in the Provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba, Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan and Alberta and in the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories, see SI/85-211 and SI/88-24.]
Aggravating circumstances for sentencing purposes
255.1 Without limiting the generality of section 718.2, where a court imposes a sentence for an offence committed under this Act by means of a motor vehicle, vessel or aircraft or of railway equipment, evidence that the concentration of alcohol in the blood of the offender at the time when the offence was committed exceeded one hundred and sixty milligrams of alcohol in one hundred millilitres of blood shall be deemed to be aggravating circumstances relating to the offence that the court shall consider under paragraph 718.2(a).
Application[edit | edit source]
Principles[edit | edit source]
Impaired driving causes "the most significant social loss to the country"
The primary principle to be considered is general deterrence.
In Manitoba, impaired causing bodily harm will typically involve a range of sentence from 3 to 18 months.
In Nova Scotia, the range of sentence for impaired driving causing death with no prior record is 2 to 5 years.
- eg.R. v. Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5,  1 S.C.R. 190 at 42, and R. v. Bernshaw, 1995 CanLII 150 (SCC),  1 S.C.R. 254
Squires,  N.J. No. 157 (C.A.) at page 5
R. v. McVeigh 1985 CanLII 115 (ON CA) at page 150
R. v. Connolly, N.J. No. 40 (P.C.) at para 18
Riggs, 2011 NLTD(G) 26 at para 37
R. v. Jacobs, (1982), 70 C.C.C. (2d) 569 (Alta. C.A.)
R. v. Alexson (1987), 7 M.V.R. (2d) 95 (Sask. C.A.))
- R. v. Woodward, (1993), 108 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 240 (N.L.C.A.))
- R. v. MacDonald 1999 CanLII 5083 (MB CA), (1999), 139 C.C.C. (3d) 524 (Man. C.A.)
- R v Morine, 2011 NSSC 46 at 79
Factors[edit | edit source]
- BAC reading, esp. if exceeding 160mg
- other signs of a high degree of impairment
- injuries to other persons
- prior alcohol-related convictions, including dates
See also:Musseau,  N.J. No. 25 (P.C.)