Jump to content

Calculus/Proofs of Some Basic Limit Rules

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
← Formal Definition of the Limit Calculus Limits/Exercises →
Proofs of Some Basic Limit Rules

Now that we have the formal definition of a limit, we can set about proving some of the properties we stated earlier in this chapter about limits.

Constant Rule for Limits

If a,b are constants then limx→ab=b .

Proof of the Constant Rule for Limits

We need to find a δ>0 such that for every ε>0 , |b−b|<ε whenever 0<|x−a|<δ . |b−b|=0 and ε>0 , so |b−b|<ε is satisfied independent of any value of δ ; that is, we can choose any δ we like and the ε condition holds.


Identity Rule for Limits

If a is a constant then limx→ax=a .

Proof

To prove that limx→ax=a , we need to find a δ>0 such that for every ε>0 , |x−a|<ε whenever 0<|x−a|<δ . Choosing δ=ε satisfies this condition.


Scalar Product Rule for Limits

Suppose that limx→af(x)=L for finite L and that c is constant. Then limx→ac⋅f(x)=c⋅limx→af(x)=c⋅L

Proof

Given the limit above, there exists in particular a δ>0 such that |f(x)−L|<εk whenever 0<|x−a|<δ , for some k>0 such that |c|<k . Hence

|c⋅f(x)−c⋅L|=|c|⋅|f(x)−L|<k⋅εk=ε


Sum Rule for Limits

Suppose that limx→cf(x)=L and limx→cg(x)=M . Then

limx→c[f(x)+g(x)]=limx→cf(x)+limx→cg(x)=L+M
Proof

Since we are given that limx→cf(x)=L and limx→cg(x)=M , there must be functions, call them δf(ε) and δg(ε) , such that for all ε>0 , |f(x)−L|<ε whenever |x−c|<δf(ε) , and |g(x)−M|<ε whenever |x−c|<δg(ε) .
Adding the two inequalities gives |f(x)−L|+|g(x)−M|<2ε . By the triangle inequality we have |(f(x)−L)+(g(x)−M)|=|(f(x)+g(x))−(L+M)|≤|f(x)−L|+|g(x)−M| , so we have |(f(x)+g(x))−(L+M)|<2ε whenever |x−c|<δf(ε) and |x−c|<δg(ε) . Let δfg(ε) be the smaller of δf(ε2) and δg(ε2) . Then this δ satisfies the definition of a limit for limx→c[f(x)+g(x)] having limit L+M .


Difference Rule for Limits

Suppose that limx→cf(x)=L and limx→cg(x)=M . Then

limx→c[f(x)−g(x)]=limx→cf(x)−limx→cg(x)=L−M
Proof

Define h(x)=−g(x) . By the Scalar Product Rule for Limits, limx→ch(x)=−M . Then by the Sum Rule for Limits, limx→c[f(x)−g(x)]=limx→c[f(x)+h(x)]=L−M .


Product Rule for Limits

Suppose that limx→cf(x)=L and limx→cg(x)=M . Then limx→c[f(x)⋅g(x)]=limx→cf(x)⋅limx→cg(x)=L⋅M

Proof

Let ε be any positive number. The assumptions imply the existence of the positive numbers δ1,δ2,δ3 such that

(1)|f(x)−L|<ε2(1+|M|) when 0<|x−c|<δ1
(2)|g(x)−M|<ε2(1+|L|) when 0<|x−c|<δ2
(3)|g(x)−M|<1 when 0<|x−c|<δ3

According to the condition (3) we see that

|g(x)|=|g(x)−M+M|≤|g(x)−M|+|M|<1+|M| when 0<|x−c|<δ3

Supposing then that 0<|x−c|<min⁡{δ1,δ2,δ3} and using (1) and (2) we obtain

|f(x)g(x)−LM|=|f(x)g(x)−Lg(x)+Lg(x)−LM|≤|f(x)g(x)−Lg(x)|+|Lg(x)−LM|=|g(x)|⋅|f(x)−L|+|L|⋅|g(x)−M|<(1+|M|)ε2(1+|M|)+(1+|L|)ε2(1+|L|)=ε


Quotient Rule for Limits

Suppose that limx→cf(x)=L and limx→cg(x)=M and M≠0 . Then limx→cf(x)g(x)=limx→cf(x)limx→cg(x)=LM

Proof

If we can show that limx→c1g(x)=1M , then we can define a function, h(x) as h(x)=1g(x) and appeal to the Product Rule for Limits to prove the theorem. So we just need to prove that limx→c1g(x)=1M .

Let ε be any positive number. The assumptions imply the existence of the positive numbers δ1,δ2 such that

(1)|g(x)−M|<ε|M|22 when 0<|x−c|<δ1
(2)|g(x)−M|<|M|2 when 0<|x−c|<δ2

According to the condition (2) we see that

|M|=|M−g(x)+g(x)|≤|M−g(x)|+|g(x)|<|M|2+|g(x)| so |g(x)|>|M|2 when 0<|x−c|<δ2

which implies that

(3)|1g(x)|<2|M| when 0<|x−c|<δ2

Supposing then that 0<|x−c|<min⁡{δ1,δ2} and using (1) and (3) we obtain

|1g(x)−1M|=|M−g(x)Mg(x)|=|g(x)−MMg(x)|=|1g(x)|⋅|1M|⋅|g(x)−M|<2|M|⋅1|M|⋅|g(x)−M|<2|M|⋅1|M|⋅ε|M|22=ε


Theorem: (Squeeze Theorem)

Suppose that g(x)≤f(x)≤h(x) holds for all x in some open interval containing c , except possibly at x=c itself. Suppose also that limx→cg(x)=limx→ch(x)=L . Then limx→cf(x)=L also.

Proof

From the assumptions, we know that there exists a δ such that |g(x)−L|<ε and |h(x)−L|<ε when 0<|x−c|<δ .
These inequalities are equivalent to L−ε<g(x)<L+ε and L−ε<h(x)<L+ε when 0<|x−c|<δ.
Using what we know about the relative ordering of f(x),g(x) , and h(x) , we have
L−ε<g(x)≤f(x)≤h(x)<L+ε when 0<|x−c|<δ .
Then
−ε<f(x)−L<ε when 0<|x−c|<δ .
So
|f(x)−L|<ε when 0<|x−c|<δ .


← Formal Definition of the Limit Calculus Limits/Exercises →
Proofs of Some Basic Limit Rules