# Arithmetic Course/Types of Number/Complex Number

## Complex Number[edit]

Complex Number and its Complex Conjugate is a number that has the general form

## Mathematic Operations[edit]

### Addition of 2 Complex Numbers[edit]

### Subtraction of 2 Complex Numbers[edit]

### Multiplication of 2 Complex Numbers[edit]

### Division of 2 Complex Numbers[edit]

### Square root[edit]

The square roots of *a* + *bi* (with *b* ≠ 0) are , where

and

This can be seen by squaring to obtain *a* + *bi*.^{[1]}^{[2]} Here is called the modulus of *a + bi*, and the square root with non-negative real part is called the **principal square root**.

### Conjugation[edit]

The *complex conjugate* of the complex number *z* = *x* + *yi* is defined to be *x* − *yi*. It is denoted or . Geometrically, is the "reflection" of *z* about the real axis. In particular, conjugating twice gives the original complex number: .

The real and imaginary parts of a complex number can be extracted using the conjugate:

Moreover, a complex number is real if and only if it equals its conjugate.

Conjugation distributes over the standard arithmetic operations:

The reciprocal of a nonzero complex number *z* = *x* + *yi* is given by

This formula can be used to compute the multiplicative inverse of a complex number if it is given in rectangular coordinates. Inversive geometry, a branch of geometry studying more general reflections than ones about a line, can be expressed in terms of complex numbers, too.

## Polar form[edit]

### Absolute value and argument[edit]

Another way of encoding points in the complex plane than using the *x*- and *y*-coordinates is to use the distance of a point *P* to *O*, the point whose coordinates are (0, 0) (origin), and the angle of the line through *P* and *O*. This idea leads to the polar form of complex numbers.

The *absolute value* (or *modulus* or *magnitude*) of a complex number *z* = *x*+*yi* is

If *z* is a real number (i.e., *y* = 0), then *r* = |*x*|. In general, by Pythagoras' theorem, *r* is the distance of the point *P* representing the complex number *z* to the origin.

The *argument* or *phase* of *z* is the angle to the real axis, and is written as . As with the modulus, the argument can be found from the rectangular form :^{[3]}

The value of *φ* can change by any multiple of 2*π* and still give the same angle (note that radians are being used). Hence, the arg function is sometimes considered as multivalued. Normally, as given above, the principal value in the interval is chosen. Values in the range are obtained by adding if the value is negative. The polar angle of the origin is undefined but the value 0 is commonly used.

Together, *r* and *φ* give another way of representing complex numbers, the *polar form*, as the combination of modulus and argument fully specify the position of a point on the plane. Recovering the original rectangular co-ordinates from the polar form is done by the formula called *trigonometric form*

Using Euler's formula this can be written as

Using the cis function, this is sometimes abbreviated to

In angle notation, often used in electronics to represent a phasor with amplitude *r* and phase *φ* it is written as^{[4]}

### Multiplication, division and exponentiation in polar form[edit]

The relevance of representing complex numbers in polar form stems from the fact that the formulas for multiplication, division and exponentiation are simpler than the ones using Cartesian coordinates. Given two complex numbers *z*_{1} = *r*_{1}(cos φ_{1} + *i*sin φ_{1}) and *z*_{2} =*r*_{2}(cos φ_{2} + *i*sin φ_{2}) the formula for multiplication is

In other words, the absolute values are multiplied and the arguments are added to yield the polar form of the product. For example, multiplying by *i* corresponds to a quarter-rotation counter-clockwise, which gives back *i*^{ 2} = −1. The picture at the right illustrates the multiplication of

Since the real and imaginary part of 5+5*i* are equal, the argument of that number is 45 degrees, or π/4 (in radian). On the other hand, it is also the sum of the angles at the origin of the red and blue triangle are arctan(1/3) and arctan(1/2), respectively. Thus, the formula

holds. As the arctan function can be approximated highly efficiently, formulas like this—known as Machin-like formulas—are used for high-precision approximations of π.

Similarly, division is given by

This also implies de Moivre's formula for exponentiation of complex numbers with integer exponents:

The *n*-th roots of *z* are given by

for any integer *k* satisfying 0 ≤ *k* ≤ n − 1. Here is the usual (positive) *n*th root of the positive real number *r*. While the *n*th root of a positive real number *r* is chosen to be the *positive* real number *c* satisfying *c*^{n} = *x* there is no natural way of distinguishing one particular complex *n*th root of a complex number. Therefore, the *n*th root of *z* is considered as a multivalued function (in *z*), as opposed to a usual function *f*, for which *f*(*z*) is a uniquely defined number. Formulas such as

(which holds for positive real numbers), do in general not hold for complex numbers.

## de Moivre's formula[edit]

In mathematics, **de Moivre's formula**, named after Abraham de Moivre, states that for any complex number (and, in particular, for any real number) *x* and integer *n* it holds that

The formula is important because it connects complex numbers (*i* stands for the imaginary unit) and trigonometry. The expression cos *x* + *i* sin *x* is sometimes abbreviated to cis *x*.

By expanding the left hand side and then comparing the real and imaginary parts under the assumption that *x* is real, it is possible to derive useful expressions for cos (*nx*) and sin (*nx*) in terms of cos *x* and sin *x*. Furthermore, one can use a generalization of this formula to find explicit expressions for the *n*th roots of unity, that is, complex numbers *z* such that *z ^{n}* = 1.

### Derivation[edit]

Although historically proven earlier, de Moivre's formula can easily be derived from Euler's formula:

and the exponential law for integer powers

Then, by Euler's formula,

## References[edit]

- ↑ Abramowitz, Miltonn; Stegun, Irene A. (1964). [/books?id=MtU8uP7XMvoC
*Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables*]. Courier Dover Publications. p. 17. ISBN 0-486-61272-4. /books?id=MtU8uP7XMvoC., Section 3.7.26, p. 17 - ↑ Cooke, Roger (2008). [/books?id=lUcTsYopfhkC
*Classical algebra: its nature, origins, and uses*]. John Wiley and Sons. p. 59. ISBN 0-470-25952-3. /books?id=lUcTsYopfhkC., Extract: page 59 - ↑ Kasana, H.S. (2005). [/books?id=rFhiJqkrALIC
*Complex Variables: Theory And Applications*] (2nd ed.). PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 14. ISBN 81-203-2641-5. /books?id=rFhiJqkrALIC., Extract of chapter 1, page 14 - ↑ Nilsson, James William; Riedel, Susan A. (2008). [/books?id=sxmM8RFL99wC
*Electric circuits*] (8th ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 338. ISBN 0-131-98925-1. /books?id=sxmM8RFL99wC., Chapter 9, page 338