Wikibooks:Requests for permissions/Krischik

+Administrator

I think we need more admins and Krischik is a good candidate for this function. Krischik is currently biggest contributor to Wikibooks [1], he spent more than a year on the project. He fights vandalism and helps with organising Wikibooks. After interviewing him I think he will be able to cope with admin tasks. --Derbeth ^talk 18:15, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

• accept - If I understand the rules correct I have to accept the nomination - so here it is. --Krischik ^T 07:42, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

• Yes. This user has my vote. Recent posts by jimbo suggest (where they don't say blatantly) that wikibooks needs to have more admins, and more active admins to help keep things under control. Also, he says that (and i whole-heartedly agree) wikibooks needs to become more "serious", and it needs to strip away the fat and the nonsense that has accumulated over time. This new period of seriousness requires admins who are active, willing to help, and who have a good understanding of wikibooks. I think Krischik can do the job. --Whiteknight _TC^E 13:45, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
• Yes. I know him from the Ada Programming book. From his work in this book and in Wikibooks in general, I think he would be a good administrator. ManuelGR 19:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Support He has done a great job so far, time to be given adminship :) --Cspurrier 15:35, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Support Gentgeen 09:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Support, definitely. Garrett^Talk 19:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
• Support. No big deal. Sysop him already. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 19:41, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Done. Godspeed ;) Dysprosia 01:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

-Administrator

• Last Contribution: September 24 2009 (prior to that, September 29 2008)
• Last Tool Use: July 6 2009 [deletion] (prior to that, October 9 2008)

Per policy on inactivity. Fewer than 20 edits in the last year, no edit in the last month. Admin tools used only once in the past year. Prior to that they were used once on October 9 2008. Longer term, they were only used twice in 2007. Use once a year is not enough to retain the tools. User may request tools again should they become active and have a need for them again. -- Adrignola ^{talk contribs} 16:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Support the removal. Thank you for your efforts over the years Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 18:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Done at Meta. -- Adrignola ^{talk contribs} 00:36, 29 December 2009 (UTC)