Open Scholarship Press Collections: Community/Complete Alphabetical List of References

A

• Adema, Janneke. 2010. “Overview of Open Access Models for EBooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” OAPEN Project Report.
• ———. 2015. “The Monograph Crisis Revisited.” Open Reflections (blog).
• ———. 2021. Living Books: Experiments in the Posthumanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Agate, Nicky, Gail Clement, Danny Kingsley, Sam Searle, Leah Vanderjagt, and Jen Waller. 2017. “From the Ground Up: A Group Editorial on the Most Pressing Issues in Scholarly Communication.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 5. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2196
• Ahmed, Allam. 2007. “Open Access Towards Bridging the Digital Divide—Policies and Strategies for Developing Countries.” Information Technology for Development 13 (4): 337–61.
• Albornoz, Denisse, Angela Okune, and Leslie Chan. 2020. “Can Open Scholarly Practices Redress Epistemic Injustice?” In Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access, edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray, 65–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Alperin, Juan Pablo, Carol Muñoz Nieves, Lesley Schimanski, Gustavo E. Fischman, Meredith T. Niles, and Erin C. McKiernan. 2018. “How Significant Are the Public Dimensions of Faculty Work in Review, Promotion, and Tenure Documents?” Humanities Commons. https://doi.org/10.17613/M6W950N35
• Andersen, Christian Ulrik, and Søren Bro Pold. 2014. “Post-Digital Books and Disruptive Literary Machines.” Formules/Revue Des Creations Formelles et Littératures à Contraintes 18: 169–88.
• Anokwa, Yaw, Carl Hartung, Waylon Brunette, Gaetano Boriello, and Adam Lerer. 2009. “Open Source Data Collection in the Developing World.” Computer 42 (10): 97–99.
• Arbuckle, Alyssa. 2019a. “Open+: Versioning Open Social Scholarship.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 3 (February): 18. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.39
• ———. 2019b. “Opportunities for Social Knowledge Creation in the Digital Humanities.” In Doing More Digital Humanities, 290–300. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429353048-20
• Arbuckle, Alyssa, Alex Christie, ETCL Research Group, INKE Research Group, and MVP Research Group. 2015. “Intersections Between Social Knowledge Creation and Critical Making.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n3a200
• Arbuckle, Alyssa, and John Maxwell. 2019. “Modelling Open Social Scholarship Within the INKE Community.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 3 (February): 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.15
• Arbuckle, Alyssa. 2020. “How Can We Broaden and Diversify Humanities Knowledge Translation?” Pop! Public. Open. Participatory. 1: n.p. https://doi.org/10.48404/POP.2020.12
• Asmah, Josephine. 2014. “International Policy and Practice on Open Access for Monographs.” Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences. http://www.ideas-idees.ca/sites/default/files/aspp-oa-appendix.pdf
• Aspesi, Claudio, and Amy Brand. 2020. “In Pursuit of Open Science, Open Access Is Not Enough.” Science 368 (6491): 574–77. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3763
• Avila, Maria. 2010. “Community Organizing Practices in Academia: A Model of Stories and Partnerships.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 14 (2): 37–63. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/430

B

• Bailey, D. Russell. 2017. “Creating Digital Knowledge: Library as Open Access Digital Publisher.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 24 (2–4): 216–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1323695
• Bailey, Moya Z. 2011. “All the Digital Humanists Are White, All the Nerds Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1 (1). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-1/all-the-digital-humanists-are-white-all-the-nerds-are-men-but-some-of-us-are-brave-by-moya-z-bailey/
• Ball, Cheryl E., and Douglas Eyman. 2015. “Editorial Workflows for Multimedia-Rich Scholarship.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (4): n.p.
• Balyasnikova, Natalia, and Kedrick James. 2020. “PhoneMe Poetry: Mapping Community in the Digital Age.” Engaged Scholars Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning 6 (2): 107-16.
• Barnes, Jessica V., Emily L. Altimare, Patricia A. Farrell, Robert E. Brown, C. Richard Burnett III, LaDonna Gamble, and James Davis. 2009. “Creating and Sustaining Authentic Partnerships with Community in a Systemic Model.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 13 (4): 15–29.
• Bath, Jon, Scott Schofield, and INKE Research Group. 2014. “The Digital Book.” In The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book, edited by Leslie Howsam, 181–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bauer, Florian, and Martin Kaltenbock. 2012. Linked Open Data: The Essentials. Vienna, Austria: http://bls.buu.ac.th/~f55361/08Aug22/LOD/EBFFFd01.pdf
• Belojevic, Nina. 2015. “Developing an Open, Networked Peer Review System.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (2). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/205
• Bennett, W. Lance, ed. 2008. Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
• Berry, David M. 2012. “The Social Epistemologies of Software.” Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 26 (3–4): 379–98.
• Berson, Amber, Monika-Sengul Jones, and Melissa Tamani. 2021. Unreliable Guidelines: Reliable Sources and Marginalized Communities in French, English and Spanish Wikipedias. Art + Feminism.
• Biagioli, Mario. 2002. “From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review.” Emergences 12 (1): 11–45.
• Boon, Marcus. 2014. “From the Right to Copy to Practices of Copying.” In Dynamic Fair Dealing: Creating Canadian Content Online, edited by Rosemary J. Coombe, Darren Wershler, and Martin Zeilinger, 56–64. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Borgman, Christine. 2007. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• ———. 2015. Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Bowdon, Melody A., and Russell G. Carpenter. 1AD. Higher Education, Emerging Technologies, and Community Partnerships: Concepts, Models and Practices. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. http://www.igi-global.com/gateway/book/47442
• Bowen, William R., Matthew Hiebert, and Constance Crompton. 2014. “Iter Community: Prototyping an Environment for Social Knowledge Creation and Communication.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). http://srconline.ca/index.php/src/article/view/193
• Bradley, Jean-Claude, Robert J. Lancashire, Andrew SID Lang, and Anthony J. Williams. 2009. “The Spectral Game: Leveraging Open Data and Crowd-Sourcing for Education.” Journal of Cheminformatics 1 (9): 1–10.
• Brennan, Sheila A. 2016. “Public, First.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, edited by Matthew K. Goldman and Lauren F. Klein, 384–90. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/83
• Brienza, Casey. 2015. “Activism, Legitimation, or Record: Towards a New Tripartite Typology of Academic Journals.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 46: 141–157.
• Broekman, Pauline van Mourik, Gary Hall, Ted Byfield, Shaun Hides, and Simon Worthington. 2015. Open Education: A Study in Disruption. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
• Brown, David. 1995. “The Public/Academic Disconnect.” Higher Education Exchange, 38–42. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.
• Brown, Susan. 2016. “Towards Best Practices in Collaborative Online Knowledge Production.” In In Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research, edited by Constance Crompton, Richard J. Lane, and Ray Siemens, 47–64. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
• Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.
• Bullard, Julia. 2019. “Knowledge Organization For Open Scholarship.” Pop! Public. Open. Participatory 1 (October). https://doi.org/10.21810/pop.2019.005
• Bullinger, Hans-Jörg, Karl Max Einhäupl, Peter Gaehtgens, Peter Gruss, Hans-Olaf Henkel, Walter Kröll, Ernst-Ludwig Winnacker, et al. 2003. “Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities.” https://openaccess.mpg.de/67605/berlin_declaration_engl.pdf
• Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Todd Presner, Jeffrey Schnapp, and Peter Lunenfeld. 2012. “The Social Life of the Digital Humanities.” In Digital_Humanities, edited by Anne Burdick, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp, 73–99. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Burke, Peter. 2000. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• ———. 2012. A Social History of Knowledge II: From the Encyclopedie to Wikipedia. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Butin, Dan. 2010. Service-Learning in Theory and Practice: The Future of Community Engagement in Higher Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

C

• Canadian Scholarly Publishing Working Group. 2017. “Final Report.” https://www.carl-abrc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CSPWG_final_report_EN.pdf
• Cao, Qilin, Yong Lu, Dayong Dong, Zongming Tang, and Yongqiang Li. 2013. “The Roles of Bridging and Bonding in Social Media Communities.” Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (8): 1671–81.
• Carletti, Laura, Gabriella Giannachi, Dominic Price, Derek McAuley, and Steve Benford. 2013. “Digital Humanities and Crowdsourcing: An Exploration.” Museums and the Web 2013 Conference. Portland: Museums and the Web. http://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/digital-humanities-and-crowdsourcing-an-exploration-4/ https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/17763
• Causer, Tim, and Melissa Terras. 2014. “Crowdsourcing Bentham: Beyond the Traditional Boundaries of Academic History.” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 8 (1): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2014.0119
• Causer, Tim, Justin Tonra, and Valerie Wallace. 2012. “Transcription Maximized; Expense Minimized? Crowdsourcing and Editing ‘The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham.’” Literary and Linguistic Computing 27 (2): 119–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs004
• Causer, Tim, and Valerie Wallace. 2012. “Building a Volunteer Community: Results and Findings from ‘Transcribe Bentham.’” Digital Humanities Quarterly 6 (2). http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/6/2/000125/000125.html
• Chan, Leslie, Darius Cuplinskas, Michael Eisen, Fred Friend, Yana Genova, Jean-Claude Guédon, Melissa Hagemann, et al. 2002. “Budapest Open Access Initiative.” Budapest, Hungary: Budapest Open Access Initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
• Chan, Leslie. 2004. “Supporting and Enhancing Scholarship in the Digital Age.” Canadian Journal of Communication 29 (3): 277–300.
• Chan, Leslie, Bud Hall, Florence Piron, Rajesh Tandon, and Lorna Williams. 2020. “Open Science Beyond Open Access: For and With Communities. A Step Towards the Decolonization of Knowledge.” The Canadian Commission for UNESCO’s IdeaLab.
• Chapman, Owen, and Kim Sawchuck. 2012. “Research-Creation: Intervention, Analysis, and ‘Family Resemblances.’” Canadian Journal of Communication 37: 5–26.
• Christie, Alex, INKE Research Group, and MVP Research Group. 2014. “Interdisciplinary, Interactive, and Online: Building Open Communication Through Multimodal Scholarly Articles and Monographs.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/190
• Christie, Alex, Jana M. Usiskin, Jentery Sayers, and Kathryn Tanigawa. 2014. “Digital Humanities, Public Humanities.” Introduction to New American Notes Online 5. https://nanocrit.com/issues/issue5/introduction-digital-humanities-public-humanities.
• Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2004. “‘On Software, or the Persistence of Visual Knowledge.’” Grey Room 19: 27–51.
• Clement, Tanya. 2011. “Knowledge Representation and Digital Scholarly Editions in Theory and Practice.” Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative 1 (June): n.p.
• Cohen, Daniel J. 2010. “Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Values.” Dan Cohen (blog). 2010. https://www.dancohen.org
• ———. 2012. “The Social Contract of Scholarly Publishing.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 319–21. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Cohen, Daniel J., and Tom Scheinfeldt. 2013. Preface to Hacking the Academy: New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities, edited by Daniel J. Cohen and Tom Scheinfeldt, 3–5. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/dh.12172434.0001.001
• Colbeck, Carole L., and Lisa D. Weaver. 2008. “Faculty Engagement in Public Scholarship: A Motivation Systems Theory Perspective.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 12 (2): 7–31.
• Cooper, Amanda, and Ben Levin. 2010. “Some Canadian Contributions to Understanding Knowledge Mobilisation.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 6 (3): 351–69. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410X524839
• Coughlan, Rosarie, and Mark Swartz. 2020. “An Overview of the Open Access Movement in Canada.” In Open Praxis, Open Access: Digital Scholarship in Action, edited by Darren Chase and Dana Haugh, 19–40. Chicago: American Library Association.
• Crompton, Constance, Ray Siemens, Alyssa Arbuckle, and Devonshire Manuscript Editorial Group. 2015. “Enlisting ‘Vertues Noble & Excelent’: Behaviour, Credit, and Knowledge Organization in the Social Edition.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9 (2). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000202/000202.html
• Cuffe, Honae H. 2019. “Lend Me Your Ears: The Rise of the History Podcast in Australia.” History Australia 16 (3): 553–69.
• Cuthill, Michael. 2012. “A ‘Civic Mission’ for the University: Engaged Scholarship and Community-Based Participatory Research.” In Higher Education and Civic Engagement: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Lorraine McIlrath, Ann Lyons, and Ronaldo Munck, 81–99. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

D

• Davidson, Cathy N., and David Theo. Goldberg. 2004. “Engaging the Humanities.” Profession, 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1632/074069504X26386
• Davies, Tim. 2010. “Open Data, Democracy and Public Sector Reform. A Look at Open Government Data Use from Data.Gov.Uk.” Open Data Impacts. http://www.opendataimpacts.net/report/
• Deegan, Marilyn, and Willard McCarty, eds. 2012. Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
• Deuze, Mark, Axel Bruns, and Christoph Neuberger. 2007. “Preparing for an Age of Participatory News.” Journalism Practice 1 (3): 322–38.
• Di Noia, Tommaso, Roberto Mirizzi, Vito Claudio Ostuni, Davide Romito, and Markus Zanker. 2012. “Linked Open Data to Support Content-Based Recommender Systems.” In Proceedings of the 8th Internaltional Conference on Semantic Systems, 1–8. New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2362501
• D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Duffy, Brooke Erin, and Jefferson Pooley. 2017. “‘Facebook for Academics’: The Convergence of Self-Branding and Social Media Logic on Academia.edu.” Social Media + Society 3.
• Dumova, Tatyana. 2012. “Social Interaction Technologies and the Future of Blogging.” In Blogging in the Global Society: Cultural, Political and Geographical Aspects, 249–74. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

E

• Elliott, Michael A. 2015. “The Future of the Monograph in the Digital Era: A Report to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.” The Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (4). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.407
• Ellison, J., and T. K. Eatman. 2008. Scholarship in Public: Knowledge Creation and Tenure Policy in the Engaged University. Syracuse, NY: Imagining America. http://imaginingamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/TTI_FINAL.pdf
• Ellison, Julie. 2013. “The New Public Humanists.” PMLA 128 (2): 289–98. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.2.289
• ElSabry, ElHassan. 2017. “Claims About Benefits of Open Access to Society (Beyond Academia).” In Expanding Perspectives on Open Science: Communities, Cultures and Diversity in Concepts and Practices. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Electronic Publishing, edited by Leslie Chan and Fernando Loizides. 34–43. Amsterdam: IOS Press Ebooks.
• Emerson, Lori. 2014. Reading Writing Interfaces: From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Erickson, John, Carl Lagoze, Sandy Payette, Herbert Van de Sompel, and Simeon Warner. 2004. “Rethinking Scholarly Communication: Building the System That Scholars Deserve.” D-Lib Magazine 10 (9): n.p.
• Estellés-Arolas, Enrique, and Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara. 2012. “Towards an Integrated Crowdsourcing Definition.” Journal of Information Science 38 (2): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512437638
• Eve, Martin Paul. 2014. Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies, and the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• ———. 2015. “Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Communication in Non-Scientific Disciplines.” Online Information Review 39 (5): 717–32.
• Eve, Martin Paul, and Jonathan Gray. 2020. Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Politics, and Global Politics of Open Access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Eve, Martin Paul, Saskia C. J. de Vries, and Johan Rooryck. 2017. “The Transition to Open Access: The State of the Market, Offsetting Deals, and a Demonstrated Model for Fair Open Access with the Open Library of Humanities.” In Expanding Perspectives on Open Science: Communities, Cultures and Diversity in Concepts and Practices. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Electronic Publishing, edited by Leslie Chan and Fernando Loizides, 118–28. Amsterdam: IOS Press Ebooks.

F

• Farland, Maria. 1996. “Academic Professionalism and the New Public Mindedness.” Higher Education Exchange, 51–57. http://www.unz.org/Pub/HigherEdExchange-1996q1–00051
• Finch, Janet. 2012. “Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications [Finch Report].” Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings.
• Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2007. “CommentPress: New (Social) Structures for New (Networked) Texts.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0010.305
• ———. 2011. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. Manhattan: New York University Press.
• ———. 2012a. “Beyond Metrics: Community Authorization and Open Peer Review.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 452–59. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• ———. 2012b. “The Humanities, Done Digitally.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew Gold, 12–15. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/30
• ———. 2019. Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Fjällbrant, Nancy. 1997. “Scholarly Communication—Historical Development and New Possibilities.” In Proceedings of the IATUL Conference. Indiana: Purdue University Library.
• Francabandera, Laura. 2020. “The Emperor’s New Clothes: Open Access and Intersectionality.” In Open Praxis, Open Access: Digital Scholarship in Action, edited by Darren Chase and Dana Haugh, 57–68. Chicago: American Library Association.
• Fund, Sven. 2015. “Will Open Access Change the Game?: Hypotheses on the Future Cooperation of Libraries, Researchers, and Publishers.” Bibliothek 39 (2): 206–9.

G

• Gainforth, Heather L., Amy E. Latimer-Cheung, Spencer Moore, Peter Athanasopoulos, and Kathleen A. Martin Ginis. 2015. “Using Network Analysis to Understand Knowledge Mobilization in a Community-Based Organization.” International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 22 (3): 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9430-6
• Gajjala, Radhika, ACS 7700 Team 1, and ACS Team 2. 2019. “New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy.” South Asian Review (February): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2019.1575080
• Gargouri, Yassine, Chawki Hajjem, Vincente Larivière, Yves Gringas, Les Carr, Tim Brody, and Stevan Harnad. 2010. “Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research.” PLoS ONE 5 (10): n.p. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/30
• Geiger, Christian P., and Jorn Von Lucke. 2012. “Open Government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data).” EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government 4 (2): 265–78. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v4i2.143
• Ghosh, Arpita, Satyen Kale, and Preston McAfee. 2011. “Who Moderates the Moderators?: Crowdsourcing Abuse Detection in User-Generated Content.” In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 167–76. EC ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1993574.1993599
• Gibson, Cynthia. 2009. “Research Universities and Engaged Scholarship: A Leadership Agenda for Renewing the Civic Mission of Higher Education.” Campus Compact (blog). Accessed March 2, 2021. https://compact.org/resource-posts/research-universities-and-engaged-scholarship-a-leadership-agenda-for-renewing-the-civic-mission-of-higher-education/
• Glass, Chris R., and Hiram E. Fitzgerald. 2010. “Engaged Scholarship: Historical Roots, Contemporary Challenges.” In Institutional Change (vol. 1), edited by Hiram E. Fitzgerald, Cathy Burack, and Sarena D. Seifer, 9–24. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
• Government of Canada. 2013. “Capitalizing on Big Data: Toward a Policy Framework for Advancing Digital Scholarship in Canada.” Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/news_room-salle_de_presse/latest_news-nouvelles_recentes/big_data_consultation-donnees_massives_consultation-eng.aspx
• ———. 2015. “Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications.” http://www.science.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=F6765465-1
• Government of Canada, and Industry Canada. 2015. “Consultation: Developing a Digital Research Infrastructure Strategy.” Ottawa. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/plans-reports/en/canadas-st-strategy/consultation-developing-digital-research-infrastructure-strategy
• Graham, Ian D., Jo Logan, Margaret B. Harrison, Sharon E. Straus, Jacqueline Tetroe, Wenda Caswell, and Nicole Robinson. 2006. “Lost in Knowledge Translation: Time for a Map?” The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26: 13–24.
• Graham, Ian D., Jacqueline Tetroe, and KT Theories Research Group. 2007. “Some Theoretical Underpinnings of Knowledge Translation.” Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 14 (11): 936–41. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.004
• Grimme, Sara, Mike Taylor, Michael A. Elliott, Cathy Holland, Peter Potter, and Charles Watkinson. 2019. “The State of Open Monographs.” Digital Science. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.8197625
• Gruwell, Leigh. 2015. “Wikipedia’s Politics of Exclusion: Gender, Epistemology, and Feminist Rhetorical (In)Action.” Computers and Composition 37: 117–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.06.009
• Guédon, Jean-Claude. 2001. In Oldenburg’s Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
• Gurstein, Michael B. 2011. “Open Data: Empowering the Empowered or Effective Data Use for Everyone?” First Monday 16 (2). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/3316

H

• Hall, Peter V. 2011. Community-University Research Partnerships: Reflections on the Canadian Social Economy Experience. Victoria: University of Victoria.
• Harnad, Stevan. 2011. “Open Access Is a Research Community Matter, Not a Publishing Community Matter.” Lifelong Learning in Europe XVI (2): 117–18.
• ———. 2015. “Optimizing Open Access Policy.” The Serials Librarian 69 (2): 133–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1076368
• Hart, A., and D. Wolff. 2006. “Developing Communities of Practice Through Community-University Partnerships.” Planning Practice and Research 21 (1): 121–38.
• Hart, Angie, and Simon Northmore. 2011. “Auditing and Evaluating University–Community Engagement: Lessons from a UK Case Study.” Higher Education Quarterly 65 (1): 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00466.x
• Hartley, John, Jason Potts, Lucy Montgomery, Ellie Rennie, and Cameron Neylon. 2019. “Do We Need to Move From Communication Technology to User Community? A New Economic Model of the Journal as a Club.” Learned Publishing 32: 27–35.
• Hartung, Carl, Adam Lerer, Yaw Anokwa, Clint Tseng, Waylon Brunette, and Gaetano Borriello. 2010. “Open Data Kit: Tools to Build Information Services for Developing Regions.” In ICDT. New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2369236
• Hausenblas, M., and M. Karnstedt. 2010. “Understanding Linked Open Data as a Web-Scale Database.” In 2010 Second International Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications, 56–61. Menuires: IEEE Computer Society. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5477146
• Heath, Malcolm, Michael Jubb, and David Robey. 2008. “E-Publication and Open Access in the Arts and Humanities in the UK.” Ariadne 54. Archived at https://perma.cc/NKM4-E3T5
• Heller, Margaret, and Franny Gaede. 2016. “Measuring Altruistic Impact: A Model for Understanding the Social Justice of Open Access.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 4.
• Hendery, Rachel, and Jason Gibson. 2019. “Crowdsourcing Downunder.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 3 (February): 22. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.52
• Hiebert, Matthew, William R. Bowen, and Raymond Siemens. 2015. “Implementing a Social Knowledge Creation Environment.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n3a223
• Holland, B., and J. Ramaley. 2008. “Creating a Supportive Environment for Community-University Engagement: Conceptual Frameworks.” In HERDSA 2008 Conference Proceedings. Rotorua, New Zealand: HERDSA.
• Holley, Rose. 2010. “Crowdsourcing: How and Why Should Libraries Do It?” D-Lib Magazine 16 (3/4). https://doi.org/10.1045/march2010-holley
• Hoy, Arrane, and M. Johnson, eds. 2013. Deepening Community Engagement in Higher Education: Forging New Pathways. 2013 edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hsu, Wendy F. 2016. “Lessons on Public Humanities from the Civic Sphere.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, edited by Matthew K. Goldman and Lauren F. Klein, 280–86. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/75
• Huang, Chun-Kai, Cameron Neylon, Richard Hosking, Lucy Montgomery, Katie Wilson, Alkim Ozaygen, Chloe Brookes-Kenworth. 2020. “Evaluating Institutional Open Access Performance: Methodology, Challenges and Assessment.” bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.19.998336
• Hubbard, Melanie, and Dermot Ryan. 2018. “Digital Humanities as Community Engagement: The Digital Watts Project.” In Digital Humanities, Libraries, and Partnerships: A Critical Examination of Labor, Networks, and Community, edited by Robin Kear and Kate Joranson, 139–47. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102023-4.00010-0

I

• International Council for Science. 2015. “Open Data for a Big Data World.” https://council.science/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/open-data-in-big-data-world_long.pdf
• International Federation of Library Associations & Institutions. 2011. “Statement on Open Access.” IFLA. http://www.ifla.org/publications/node/8890

J

• Jay, Gregory. 2012. “The Engaged Humanities: Principles and Practices for Public Scholarship and Teaching.” Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship 3 (1): 51–63.
• Jemielniak, Dariusz, and Eduard Aibar. 2016. “Bridging the Gap between Wikipedia and Academia.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (7): 1773–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23691
• Jhangiani, Rajiv, and Robert Biswas-Diener, eds. 2017. Open: The Philosophy and Practices That Are Revolutionizing Education and Science. London: Ubiquity Press.
• Jhangiani, Rajiv Sunil. 2017. “Pragmatism vs. Idealism and the Identity Crisis of OER Advocacy.” Open Praxis 9 (2): 141–50. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.569
• Johns, Adrian. 2009. Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Johnson, Jeffrey Alan. 2014. “From Open Data to Information Justice.” Ethics and Information Technology 16 (4): 263–74.
• Jones, Steven E. 2014. “Publications.” In The Emergence of the Digital Humanities, 147–77. New York: Routledge.

K

• Kimbro, Devori, Michael Noschka, and Geoffrey Way. 2019. “Lend Us Your Earbuds: Shakespeare/Podcasting/Poesis.” Humanities 8 (67): 1–12.
• Kimmerer, Robin Wall. 2020. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge, and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
• Kondratova, Irina, and Ilia Goldfarb. 2004. “Virtual Communities of Practice: Design for Collaboration and Knowledge Creation.” In Proceedings of the European Conference on Products and Processes Modelling.
• kopas, merritt. 2015. Introduction to Videogames for Humans, 5–19. New York: Instar Books.

L

• Laakso, Mikael, Juho Lindman, Cenyu Shen, Linus Nyman, and Bo-Christer Björk. 2017. “Research Output Availability on Academic Social Networks: Implications for Stakeholders in Academic Publishing.” Electronic Markets. 27 (2): 125–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-016-0242-1
• Lampe, Cliff, Robert LaRose, Charles Steinfield, and Kurt DeMaagd. 2011. “Inherent Barriers to the Use of Social Media for Public Policy Informatics.” The Innovation Journal 16 (1): 1–17.
• Lane, Richard J. 2014. “Innovation through Tradition: New Scholarly Publishing Applications Modelled on Faith-Based Electronic Publishing & Learning Environments.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/188
• Larivière, Vincent, Stephanie Haustein, and Phillipe Mongeon. 2015. “Big Publishers, Bigger Profits: How the Scholarly Community Lost the Control of Its Journals.” Media Tropes V (2): 102–10.
• Lawson, Stuart. 2017a. “Access, Ethics, and Piracy.” Insights 30 (1): 25–30.
• ———. 2017b. “Against Capital.” In Proceedings of ReCon: Publishing for Early Career Researchers—Immortalisation, Recognition & Metrics. http://stuartlawson.org/2017/07/against-capital/
• Leadership Council for Digital Infrastructure. 2014. “‘Think Piece’ on a DI Roadmap.” http://digitalleadership.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/DI-Roadmap-Think-Piece-Jan-2014.pdf
• Letierce, Julie, Alexandre Passant, John Breslin, and Stefan Decker. 2010. “Understanding How Twitter Is Used to Spread Scientific Messages.” Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Understanding-how-Twitter-is-used-to-spread-Letierce-Passant/c9d5d81311973b22f6b18a7f050ee976fef74dfb
• Levkoe, Charles Z., Amanda Wilson, and Victoria Schembri. 2018. “Community-Academic Peer Review: Prospects for Strengthening Community-Campus Engagement and Enriching Scholarship” Engaged Scholars Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning 4 (2): 1–20.
• Lewis, Vivian, Lisa Spiro, Xuemao Wang, and Jon E. Cawthorne. 2015. “Building Expertise to Support Digital Scholarship.” https://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub168
• Lin, Carolyn A., and David J. Atkin, eds. 2007. Communication Technology and Social Change: Theory and Implications. LEA’s Communication Series. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Lorimer, Rowland. 2014a. “A Good Idea, a Difficult Reality: Toward a Publisher/Library Open Access Partnership.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4).
• ———. 2014b. “Open Access Publishing and Academic Research.” In Dynamic Fair Dealing: Creating Canadian Content Online, edited by Rosemary J. Coombe, Darren Wershler, and Martin Zeilinger, 177–88. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Losh, Elisabeth. 2012. “Hacktivism and the Humanities: Programming Protest in the Era of the Digital University.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, 161–86. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://uvic.summon.serialssolutions.com/#!/search/document?ho=t&l=en&q=Hacktivism%20and%20the%20Humanities:%20Programming%20Protest%20in%20the%20Era%20of%20the%09Digital%20University&id=FETCHMERGED-chadwyckhealey_abell_R047068812
• Lovett, Julia A., Andrée J. Rathemacher, Diana Boukari, and Corey Lang. 2017. “Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2183.
• Lynch, Clifford A. 2010. “Imagining a University Press System to Support Scholarship in the Digital Age.” Journal of Electronic Publishing.
• Lynch, Clifford A., and Lee Dirks. 2011. “New Initiatives in Open Research.” In Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference 13 (2): n.p. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0013.207?view=text;rgn=main

M

• Mandell, Laura. 2015. Breaking the Book: Print Humanities in the Digital Age. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Manzo, Christina, Geoff Kaufman, Sukdith Punjashitkul, and Mary Flanagan. 2015. “‘By the People, For the People’: Assessing the Value of Crowdsourced, User-Generated Metadata.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9 (1): n.p.
• Marczewska, Kaja, Janneke Adema, Frances McDonald, and Whitney Trettien. 2018. The Poethics of Scholarship. Post Office Press and Rope Press.
• Maron, Nancy, Kimberly Schmelzinger, Christine Mulhern, and Daniel Rossman. 2016. “The Costs of Publishing Monographs: Toward a Transparent Methodology.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 19 (1): n.p.
• Martin III, John D. 2017. “Piracy, Public Access, and Preservation: An Exploration of Sustainable Accessibility in a Public Torrent Index.” SocArxiv. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/hzp6r/
• Martin, Victoria. 2020. “The Concept of Openness in Scholarship.” In Open Praxis, Open Access: Digital Scholarship in Action, edited by Darren Chase and Dana Haugh, 3–18. Chicago: American Library Association.
• Maryl, Maciej, Marta Błaszczyńska, Agnieszka Szulińska, and Paweł Rams. 2020. “The Case for an Inclusive Scholarly Communication Infrastructure for Social Sciences and Humanities.” F1000Research 9 (1265): n.p. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.26545.1
• Maxwell, John. 2013. “E-Book Logic: We Can Do Better.” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada 51 (1): n.p.
• Maxwell, John, Alessandra Bordini, and Katie Shamash. 2017. “Reassembling Scholarly Communications: An Evaluation of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation’s Monograph Initiative.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 20 (1): n.p.
• Maxwell, John, and Kathleen Fraser. 2010. “Traversing the Book of MPub: An Agile, Web-First Publishing Model.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 13 (3): n.p.
• Maxwell, John W. 2014. “Publishing Education in the 21st Century and the Role of the University.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0017.205
• ———. 2015. “Beyond Open Access to Open Publication and Open Scholarship.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n3a202
• Maxwell, John W., Erik Hanson, Leena Desai, Carmen Tiampo, Kim O’Donnell, Avvai Ketheeswaran, Melody Sun, Emma Walter, and Ellen Michelle. 2019. Mind the Gap: A Landscape Analysis of Open Source Publishing Tools and Platforms. PubPub. https://doi.org/10.21428/6bc8b38c.2e2f6c3f
• Mayer, Amy. 2010. “Phenology and Citizen Science.” BioScience 60 (3): 172–75. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.3
• McGann, Jerome. 2001. Radiant Textuality: Literary Studies After the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• McGregor, Heidi, and Kevin Guthrie. 2015. “Delivering Impact of Scholarly Information: Is Access Enough?” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.302
• McKenna, Colleen, and Jane Hughes. 2013. “Values, Digital Texts, and Open Practices—a Changing Scholarly Landscape in Higher Education.” In Literacy in the Digital University: Critical Perspectives on Learning, Scholarship, and Technology, edited by Robin Goodfellow and Mary R. Lea, 15–26. London, UK: Routledge.
• McMillan Cottom, Tressie. 2015. “‘Who Do You Think You Are?’: When Marginality Meets Academic Microcelebrity.” https://doi.org/10.7264/N3319T5T
• Meadows, Alice. 2015. “Beyond Open: Expanding Access to Scholarly Content.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.301
• ———. 2017. “Changing the Culture in Scholarly Communications.” The Scholarly Kitchen (blog). https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/08/07/changing-culture-scholarly-communications/
• Minister of Industry. 2015. “Digital Canada 150: 2.0.” Ottawa.
• Mitton, Craig, Carol E. Adair, Emily McKenzie, Scott B. Patten, and Brenda Waye Perry. 2007. “Knowledge Transfer and Exchange: Review and Synthesis of the Literature.” The Milbank Quarterly 85 (4): 729–68.
• Montgomery, Lucy, John Hartley, Cameron Neylon, Malcolm Gillies, Eve Gray, Carsten Herrmann-Pillath, Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang, et al. 2018. “Open Knowledge Institutions.” Works in Progress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press OA Books. https://doi.org/10.21428/99f89a34
• Moore, Samuel A. 2020. “Revisiting ‘the 1990s Debutante’: Scholar-led Publishing and the Prehistory of the Open Access Movement.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71:856–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24306
• Morrison, Aimee. 2018. “Of, By, and For the Internet: New Media Studies and Public Scholarship.” In The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities, edited by Jentery Sayers, 56–66. New York: Routledge.
• Morrison, Heather. 2017. “From the Field: Elsevier as an Open Access Publisher.” The Charleston Adviser. 18 (3): 53–59. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.18.3.53
• Morrison, Heather, Leslie Chan, Michael Geist, Stevan Harnad, Christian Vandendorpe, Olivier Charbonneau, Andrew Feenberg, et al. 2010. “Require Open Access to Results of Research Funded by Canadian Taxpayer.” Submission to Industry Canada Digital Economy Consultation.

N

• Neapetung, Myron, Lori Bradford, and Lalita Bharadwaj. 2019. “‘Spirit, Safety, and a Stand-off’: The Research-Creation Process and Its Roles in Relationality and Reconciliation among Researcher and Indigenous Co-Learners in Saskatchewan, Canada.” Engaged Scholars Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning 5 (2): 37-60.
• Neylon, Cameron. 2017a. “Openness in Scholarship: A Return to Core Values?”
• ———. 2017b. “Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The Lessons That Olson Can Teach Us.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 1 (1): n.p. https://kula.uvic.ca/index.php/kula/article/view/120
• Neylon, Cameron, Lucy Montgomery, Alkim Ozaygen, Neil Saunders, and Frances Pinter. 2018. “The Visibility of Open Access Monographs in a European Context: Full Report.” Open Access Publications in Europe in Areas for Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1230342
• Niles, Meredith T., Lesley A. Schimanski, Erin C. McKiernan, and Juan Pablo Alperin. 2020. “Why We Publish Where We Do: Faculty Publishing Values and Their Relationship to Review, Promotion and Tenure Expectations.” PLoS ONE 15 (3): e0228914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228914
• Nkoudou, Thomas Herve Mboa. 2020. “Epistemic Alienation in African Scholarly Communications: Open Access as a Pharmakon.” In Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Politics, and Global Politics of Open Access, edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray, 25–40. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

O

• Okune, Angela, Rebecca Hillyer, Leslie Chan, Denisse Albornoz, and Alejandro Posada. “Whose Infrastructure? Towards Inclusive and Collaborative Knowledge Infrastructures in Open Science.” In Connecting the Knowledge Commons — From Projects to Sustainable Infrastructure: The 22nd International Conference on Electronic Publishing – Revised Selected Papers, edited by Leslie Chan and Pierre Mounier. Marseille: OpenEdition Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.oep.9050
• O’Sullivan, James, Christopher P. Long, Mark A. Mattson, and Ray Siemens. 2016. “Dissemination as Cultivation: Scholarly Communications in a Digital Age.” In Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research, edited by Constance Crompton, Richard J. Lane, and Raymond G. Siemens, 384–97. London and New York: Routledge.

P

• Pearce, Nick, Martin Weller, Eileen Scanlon, and Sam Kinsley. 2010. “Digital Scholarship Considered: How New Technologies Could Transform Academic Work.” In Education 16 (1). https://journals.uregina.ca/ineducation/article/view/44
• Peters, Michael A., Tze-Chang Liu, and David J. Ondercin. 2012. “Learned Societies, Public Good Science and Openness in the Digital Age.” In The Pedagogy of the Open Society, 105–27. Open Education 1. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
• Pfister, Damien Smith. 2011. “Networked Expertise in the Era of Many-to-Many Communication: On Wikipedia and Invention.” Social Epistemology 25 (3): 217–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.578306
• Pinfield, Stephen. 2015. “Making Open Access Work: The ‘State-of-the-Art’ in Providing Open Access to Scholarly Literature.” Online Information Review 39 (5): 604–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167
• Piron, Florence. 2018. “Postcolonial Open Access.” In Open Divide. Critical Studies in Open Access, edited by Ulrich Herb and Joachim Schopfel, 117–28. Sacramento, CA: Litwin Books.
• Pooley, Jefferson. 2017a. “Scholarly Communications Shouldn’t Just Be Open, but Non-Profit Too.” LSE Impact Blog (blog). http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/08/15/scholarly-communications-shouldnt-just-be-open-but-non-profit-too/
• ———. 2017b. “The Impact Platform.” Parameters: Knowledge Under Digital Conditions (blog). http://parameters.ssrc.org/2017/01/the-impact-platform/
• Powell, Daniel, Raymond G. Siemens, William R. Bowen, Matthew Hiebert, and Lindsey Seatter. 2015. “Transformation through Integration: The Renaissance Knowledge Network (ReKN) and a Next Wave of Scholarly Publication.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n2a199
• Powell, Daniel James, Raymond G. Siemens, and INKE Research Group. 2014. “Building Alternative Scholarly Publishing Capacity: The Renaissance Knowledge Network (ReKN) as Digital Production Hub.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/183
• Priego, Ernesto. 2016. “Signal, Not Solution: Notes on Why Sci-Hub Is Not Opening Access.” The Winnower 3. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.145624.49417
• Purcell, Jennifer, Andrew Pearl, and Trina Van Schyndel. 2020. “Boundary Spanning Among Community-Engaged Faculty: An Exploratory Study of Faculty Participating in Higher Education Community Engagement.” Engaged Scholars Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning 6 (2): 1–30.

R

• RECODE Project Consortium. 2014. “Policy Recommendations for Open Access to Research Data.” http://recodeproject.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/01/recode_guideline_en_web_version_full_FINAL.pdf
• Rentier, Bernard. 2016. “Open Science: A Revolution in Sight?” Interlending & Document Supply 44 (4): 155–60.
• Research Data Canada. 2013. “Research Data Canada Response to Capitalizing on Big Data: Towards a Policy Framework for Advancing Digital Scholarship in Canada.” Ottawa. http://www.rdc-drc.ca/wp-content/uploads/Research-Data-Canada-Response-to-the-Tri-Council-Consultation-on-Digital-Scholarship.pdf
• Ridge, Mia. 2013. “From Tagging to Theorizing: Deepening Engagement with Cultural Heritage through Crowdsourcing.” Curator 56 (4): 435–50.
• Robinson-Garcia N., Costas R., van Leeuwen T. N. 2020. “Open Access Uptake by Universities Worldwide.” PeerJ 8:e9410. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9410
• Rockwell, Geoffrey. 2012. “Crowdsourcing the Humanities: Social Research and Collaboration.” In Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities, edited by Marilyn Deegan and Willard McCarty, 135–55. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
• Rodriguez, Allyson. 2017. “Collaboration in Scholarly Communication: Opportunities to Normalize Open Access.” College & Research Libraries News 78 (5): 270.
• Rogers, Katina. 2020. Putting the Humanities PhD to Work: Theory, Practice, and Models for Thriving Beyond the Classroom. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Roh, Charlotte, Harrison W. Inefuku, and Emily Drabinski. 2020. “Scholarly Communications and Social Justice.” In Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Politics, and Global Politics of Open Access, edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray, 41–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Rosenzweig, Roy. 2006. “Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past.” The Journal of American History 93 (1): 117–46.
• Ross, Claire. 2012. “Social Media for Digital Humanities and Community Engagement.” In Digital Humanities in Practice, edited by Claire Warwick, Melissa Terras, and Julianne Nyhan, 23–46. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049054.003
• Ross, Stephen, Alex Christie, and Jentery Sayers. 2014. “Expert/Crowd-Sourcing for the Linked Modernisms Project.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/viewFile/186/368

S

• Saklofske, Jon. 2012. “Fluid Layering: Reimagining Digital Literary Archives Through Dynamic, User-Generated Content.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3: 4.
• ———. 2014. “Exploding, Centralizing and Reimagining: Critical Scholarship Refracted Through the NewRadial Prototype.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (2).
• ———. 2016. “Digital Theoria, Poiesis and Praxis: Activating Humanities Research and Communication through Open Social Scholarship Platform Design.” Scholarly and Research Communication 7 (2): n.p. https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2016v7n2/3a252
• Saklofske, Jon, Jake Bruce, and INKE Research Group. 2013. “Beyond Browsing and Reading: The Open Work of Digital Scholarly Editions.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (3). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/119
• Salazar-Porzio, Margaret. 2015. “The Ecology of Arts and Humanities Education: Bridging the Worlds of Universities and Museums.” Arts & Humanities in Higher Education 14 (3): 274–92.
• Sale, Arthur, Marc Couture, Eloy Rodrigues, Les Carr, and Stevan Harnad. 2014. “Open Access Mandates and the ‘Fair Dealing’ Button.” In Dynamic Fair Dealing: Creating Canadian Culture Online, edited by Rosemary J. Coombe and Darren Wershler, 189–200. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Salo, Dorothea. 2013. “How to Scuttle a Scholarly Communication Initiative.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 1 (4): n.p. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1075
• Schuetze, Hans G. 2012. “Universities and Their Communities—Engagement and Service as Primary Mission.” In Higher Education and Civic Engagement: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Lorraine McIlrath, Ann Lyons, and Ronaldo Munck, 61–77. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
• Shane-Simpson, Christina, and Kristen Gillespie-Lynch. 2017. “Examining Potential Mechanisms Underlying the Wikipedia Gender Gap through a Collaborative Editing Task.” Computers in Human Behavior l (66): 312–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.043
• Shearer, Kathleen. 2011. “Comprehensive Brief on Open Access to Publications and Research Data for the Federal Granting Agencies.” Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1229984/comprehensive-brief-on-open-access-to-publications-and-research-data-for-the-federal-granting-agencies/1783057/
• Siemens, Lynne. 2009. “It’s a Team If You Use ‘Reply All’: An Exploration of Research Teams in Digital Humanities Environments.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 24 (2): 225–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqp009
• Siemens, Raymond G. 2002. “Scholarly Publishing at Its Source, and at Present.” Introduction to The Credibility of Electronic Publishing: A Report to the Humanities and Social Sciences Federation of Canada, compiled by Raymond G. Siemens, Michael Best, Elizabeth Grove-White, Alan Burk, James Kerr, Andy Pope, Jean-Claude Guédon, Geoffrey Rockwell, and Lynne Siemens. Text Technology 11 (1): n.p. https://web.archive.org/web/20151012065051/https://web.viu.ca/hssfc/Final/Overview
• Siemens, Raymond G., Meagan Timney, Cara Leitch, Corina Koolen, and Alex Garnett, with the ETCL, INKE, and PKP Research Groups. 2012. “Toward Modeling the Social Edition: An Approach to Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 27 (4): 445–61.
• Siemens, Raymond G., Teresa Dobson, Stan Ruecker, Richard Cunningham, Alan Galey, Claire Warwick, and Lynne Siemens. 2011. “HCI-Book? Perspectives on E-Book Research, 2006-2008 (Foundational to Implementing New Knowledge Environments).” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of Canada / Cahiers de La Société Bibliographique Du Canada 49 (1).
• Siemens, Raymond G., Claire Warwick, Richard Cunningham, Teresa Dobson, Alan Galey, Stan Ruecker, Susan Schreibman, and The INKE Research Group. 2009. “Codex Ultor: Toward a Conceptual and Theoretical Foundation for New Research on Books and Knowledge Environments.” Digital Studies / Le champ numérique 1 (2). https://www.digitalstudies.org/article/id/7194/
• Silka, Linda, G. Dean Cleghorn, Milagro Grullón, and Trinidad Tellez. 2008. “Creating Community-Based Participatory Research in a Diverse Community: A Case Study.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE 3 (2): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.5
• Silka, Linda, and Paulette Renault-Caragianes. 2007. “Community-University Research Partnerships: Devising a Model for Ethical Engagement.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 11 (2): 171–83.
• Silka, Linda, and Robin Toof. 2011. “International Perspectives on Community-University Partnerships.” Metropolitan Universities Journal: An International Forum 22 (2): 3–162.
• Silvertown, Jonathan. 2009. “A New Dawn for Citizen Science.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24 (9): 467–71. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
• Solomon, David J., and Bo-Christer Björk. 2012. “Publication Fees in Open Access Publishing: Sources of Funding and Factors Influencing Choice of Journal.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (1): 98–107.
• Stein, Bob. 2012. “Back to the Future.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (2). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.204
• Stommel, Jesse. 2018. “The Public Digital Humanities.” In Disrupting the Digital Humanities, edited by Dorothy Kim and Jesse Stommel, 79–90. Santa Barbara: Punctum Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19cwdqv.8
• Sturm, Susan, Timothy Eatman, John Saltmarsh, and Adam Bush. 2011. “Full Participation: Building the Architecture for Diversity and Public Engagement in Higher Education.” Columbia University Law School: Center for Institutional and Social Change.
• Suber, Peter. 2010. “Thoughts on Prestige, Quality, and Open Access.” Logos. 21 (1): 115–28. https://doi.org/10.1163/095796510X546959
• ———. 2011. “Creating an Intellectual Commons through Open Access.” In Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, edited by Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• ———. 2012. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/9780262517638_Open_Access_PDF_Version.pdf
• ———. 2016. Knowledge Unbound: Selected Writings on Open Access, 2002–2011. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

T

• Tanenbaum, Greg. 2014. “North American Campus-Based Open Access Funds: A Five Year Progress Report.” SPARC. http://www.sparc.arl.org/sites/default/files/OA%20Fund%205%20Year%20Review.pdf
• Taylor, Laurie N., Poushali Bhadury, Elizabeth Dale, Randi K. Gill-Sadler, Leah Rosenberg, Brian W. Keith, and Prea Persaud. 2018. “Digital Humanities as Public Humanities: Transformative Collaboration in Graduate Education.” In Digital Humanities, Libraries, and Partnerships: A Critical Examination of Labor, Networks, and Community, edited by Robin Kear and Kate Joranson, 31–44. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102023-4.00003-3
• Tennant, Jonathan P. 2016. “The Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review.” F1000Research.
• Tennant, Jonathan P., Harry Crane, Tom Crick, Jacinto Davila, Asura Enkhbayar, Johanna Havemann, Bianca Kramer, et al. 2019. “Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing.” Publications 7 (2): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020034
• Terras, Melissa. 2017. “Crowdsourcing in the Digital Humanities.” In A New Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, 420–39. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

V

• Van House, Nancy. 2003. “Digital Libraries and Collaborative Knowledge Construction.” In Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation, edited by A. P. Bishop, B. Buttenfield, and Nancy Van House, 271–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Vandendorpe, Christian. 2012. “Wikisource and the Scholarly Book.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3 (4). http://src-online.ca/src/index.php/src/article/viewFile/58/146
• ———. 2015. “Wikipedia and the Ecosystem of Knowledge.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3). http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/201
• Veletsianos, George. 2015. “A Case Study of Scholars’ Open and Sharing Practices.” Open Praxis 7 (3): 199–209.
• ———. 2016. Social Media in Academia: Networked Scholars. New York: Routledge.
• ———. 2021. “Open Educational Resources: Expanding Equity or Reflecting and Furthering Inequities?” Educational Technology Research and Development 69 (1): 407–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09840-y
• Veletsianos, George, and Royce Kimmons. 2012a. “Assumptions and Challenges of Open Scholarship.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 13 (4): 166–89. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1313
• ———. 2012b. “Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent Techno-Cultural Pressures Toward Open and Digital Scholarship in Online Networks.” Computers & Education 58 (2): 766–74.
• Vision, Todd J. 2010. “Open Data and the Social Contract of Scientific Publishing.” BioScience 60 (5): 330–31.

W

• Walsh, Brandon, Claire Maiers, Gwen Nally, and Jeremy Boggs. 2014. “Crowdsourcing Individual Interpretations: Between Microtasking and Macrotasking.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29 (3): 379–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu030
• Whitmer, Ali, Laura Ogden, John Lawton, Pam Sturner, Peter M. Groffman, Laura Schneider, David Hart, et al. 2010. “The Engaged University: Providing a Platform for Research That Transforms Society.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8 (6): 314–21. https://doi.org/10.1890/090241
• Wickman, Matthew. 2016. “What Are the Public Humanities? No, Really, What Are They?” University of Toronto Quarterly 85 (4): 6–11.
• Wiggins, Andrea, and Kevin Crowston. 2011. “From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science.” In Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. HICSS ’11. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
• Wiley, David. 2014. “Defining the ‘Open’ in Open Content.” Open Content. https://www.opencontent.org/definition/
• Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al. 2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship.” Scientific Data 3 (1): 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
• Williams, George. 2012. “Disability, Universal Design, and the Digital Humanities.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew Gold, 202–12. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Willinsky, John. 2006. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/9780262512664_Download_the_full_text.pdf
• ———. 2007. “What Open Access Research Can Do for Wikipedia.” First Monday 12 (3). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/1624/1539?inline=1
• Woodward, Kathleen. 2009. “The Future of the Humanities—in the Present & in Public.” Daedalus 138 (1): 110–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2009.138.1.110