Annotated Republic of China Case Law/Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 176
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| ←Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 175 | Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 176 | Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 177→ |
Date
[edit | edit source]13 August 1982
Issue
[edit | edit source]The criminality to circulate forged document abroad? The Control Yuan would petition for interpretation in Taiwan.
Holding
[edit | edit source]In the Criminal Code, the crimes of Article 216 listed in Clause 5 of Article 5 include circulating documents of Article 213, not Article 210, 212, or 215.
Dissent
[edit | edit source]- Justice Shih-Ron CHEN (part)
Effect
[edit | edit source]This interpretation would specify the applicability of Article 216 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of China abroad.
References
[edit | edit source]- Translation by WELLINGTON L. KOO, Formosa Transnational attorney at law
- Annotated Republic of China Laws/Criminal Code of the Republic of China, Articles 5, 210, 212, 215, 216 (1969-12-26)