User talk:Dmccreary

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Do you have any ideas what to do with XML: Managing Data Exchange/Data schemas (it seems you copied materials from that module)? Wikibooks generally don't allow forking content, do you have any ideas what to do with original module? --Derbeth talk 13:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibooks Newsletter, Volume 1[edit source]

(Wikibooks gazette home | Discuss | Bulletin board | Subscription list)

This is a short newsletter that is being distributed to all active wikibookians. You are getting this message because you are recognized as an established contributor to the project. This newsletter will be distributed on a regular basis to help share news, information, and tips. It comes from a bot account, User:The Staff. User:The Staff is currently operated by a team of wikibooks admins, the complete list of which is available on the user page of the bot. If you would like to not receive this newletter anymore, please remove your name from the list at Wikibooks:Active wikibookians.

The work you do at Wikibooks is greatly appreciated. However there are plenty of other opportunities for you to get involved and help us to create a thriving Wikibooks community. We are sure that there are things we can do to help you and your understanding of Wikibooks and similarly there are certainly things you could do to help Wikibooks become a better place.

We would like to ask all wikibookians to add the Bulletin Board to your watchlists. The Bulletin Board is a fast and easy way for wikibookians to communicate important news and events to the entire community. If you have important news to share with the community, you can feel free to add your own entry to that page.

If you have general questions or comments about Wikibooks, you are welcome to post a message on The Staff Lounge, a free discussion area. Your input would also be welcomed in the Votes for Deletion and Requests for Adminship discussion pages. These pages are all active discussion areas that help to shape the Wikibooks community as a whole.

Sometimes it is easy to forget that the Wikibooks community is much larger and more diverse then the people who work in a single book, or on a single bookshelf. Hopefully, together we can all make Wikibooks a better place, and a more valuable educational resource.

The Staff
04:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Syntax coloration of sample programs[edit source]

You ask for a solution for Syntax coloration of sample programs, the solution can be found here SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi, I have used it on the french translation here Coloration of sample programs translated in Coloration des exemples. --Dom 05:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

XForms/Read Only[edit source]

In the example XForms/Read Only the stylesheet don't seems to be the right one. --Dom (talk) 19:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Messages[edit source]

...should go on user talk pages. The userpage is more or less for users to identify themselves. I've moved that last page you made to the talk page instead. Users don't get the "you have new messages" bar for changes made to their userpage - only the user talk page.  – Mike.lifeguard | talk 17:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I just wanted to let you know that I've been watching some of your edits recently (I watch the entire live RC feed) and you're doing some really great work on these two books.

Also, the XForms book was voted to become a featured book a while back, so I've taken the liberty of putting the appropriate template onto the book. I hope you don't mind, but it's a nice little reminder of what a good condition that book is in. Keep up the good work! --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 15:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's no problem, when I see good work, I like to acknowledge it.
Hit counting is something that we've been pursuing through the technical channels, but unfortunately it's difficult to do. We had a simple counter set up at one point, but the server for that has been down for some time. Digging back through my logs (and I have to go back to about October to get any data at all), it appears that the XForms book is getting about 300 page hits per day, total. Unfortunately, I can't break that number up by individual chapters. If I had to make a guess, I would assume that many of the page hits from readers (and the 300 number would include page hits from you and other editors) are probably centralized in the beginning chapters. Sorry I can't be more helpful in this. We are working to get a better page counter set up, but progress is slow. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 16:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Google Analytics[edit source]

We tried Google Analytics before. However, the WMF has a privacy policy that prevents us from sharing personal tracking information with third parties. This means that we cannot install Google Analytics here on our website. There was an attempt for us to have users install the Analytics for themselves, but not enough users subscribed to it to make it worthwhile.

A big problem with page counting is that the website is aggressively cached so we can't record hits on the database servers themselves, but the volume at the caches is huge (because WP, WB, and all the other WMF websites go though the same caches). They are working on solutions, but they are far from being available. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 22:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots[edit source]

Hi Dan,

A quick note on your screenshots. As they are derivative works of the software they depict, they must be licensed accordingly. I updated your latest image upload license. Could you please go through your uploads and ensure that these are properly tagged. Free license software needs compatible licensing (and should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons if they can be of use outside Wikibooks). Non-free may be kept in accordance with Wikibooks:Media, but require a fair-use statement. --Swift (talk) 03:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Swift. Thank you for looking at the licenses for the images. I apologize that I do not understand your note. Since I create the images from my own forms I did not think they were derivative works. I am the creator of both the form and the image. They go together. Neither is created by anyone else. Perhaps I misunderstand the term "derivative work". I thought it implied that I took the work from some other area. I also create all the forms specifically for this book. Others are fee to put them in the commons area but I do want them to give attribution to the original authors. My understanding is that the licenses should all be consistent with the wikibooks (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0). I have worked hard to make sure that all images are in fact Creative Commons with Attribution but I know that sometimes I don't select the right selection dropdown list. Is there some way to generate a report of all the images to make sure that they in fact Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0? Do you have any documents that I should read to help create precise guidelines for the authors? --Dmccreary (talk) 12:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The images must be licensed identically to the software and an indication should be made that they are screenshots, that you did not create the image, but rather that it is a visual representation of software. Swift added {{free screenshot|license=BSD}} to the image he refers to in order to indicate this. I couldn't find what license XForms uses to know if a BSD license is correct, but it would be similar for GPL or LGPL software. See Wikibooks:Templates/Files#Screenshots for more information. -- Adrignola talk contribs 13:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Adrignola. Just to clarify, XForms is not a software package but a World Wide Web standard, just like HTML or CSS. This is a book about the standard, not a specific software package. There are many tools use to transform the forms into HTML and CSS. See W3C Specification I am still trying to figure out how to license the screen images and I very much want to conform to the guidelines in the Wikibooks. This is really complicated! --Dmccreary (talk) 13:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, well no wonder I couldn't find licensing information. Maybe you'd also want to consider {{PD-ineligible}}, though that would sacrifice attribution. Personally, I'm fine with the licensing you've put on the images (Creative Commons). -- Adrignola talk contribs 14:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes really don't want to sacrifice attribution. We want to give our authors as much credit as we can to encourage them to contribute more. If you are OK then I am OK. I will wait to see if Swift has any other suggestions. Thanks Bunches! --Dmccreary (talk) 15:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the above page supposed to be a book in itself or part of an already existing book? A Query tag has been added to the page so it might be deleted if no further action is taken after 7 days. In addition, the name for this book is very strange.--ЗAНИA talk 12:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had begun to translate your book in French, however I've stuck on the seventh page for more than one hour, as two others who wrote something on the talk page. Could you please have a look? JackPotte (discusscontribs) 20:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]