# Quantum Nanotechnology/Review of The High-Low

## Review of The High-Low

A set of limited numerals has distances apart consisting of one position apart to the next. In the initial number set we ‘count’ the spaces apart from one numeral (or symbol) to the next in the direction to the right.

The High-Low Numbers

Indicated below the initial set (shown by the black dots) is the first half of the count running to the right, the High.

We start with “1” in the initial set. 1 possess no space-apart from itself-to itself, therefore the indication below 1 is 0 spaces-apart, otherwise the count would be identical to the initial number set above the High.

From 1 to 2 the count equals 1 space-apart, and the count continues in this manner from the number 1 to the ending numeral in the initial set. i.e; 1 to 2 = one space-apart, 1 to 3 = 2 spaces-apart, 1 to 4 = 3, and so on in the direction toward the limit in the set to 6.

The High-Low showing directions

In the opposite direction to the left, and below the high count below the initial number set is the low count. As the spaces-apart began with 1 in the initial number set, we now count in the reverse direction beginning with 6.

6 like 1, possess no space-apart from itself to itself and therefore it too is 0 spaces-apart identical as is 1 in the high count only that the count will go to the left. 6 to 5 equals 1 space-apart. 6 to 4 = 2 spaces apart and so on down the line to positive 1. Together the High with the Low constitute the High-Low.

What the High-Low shows here is that the numbers representing the initial number set constitute a line-segment, running in opposing directions and thereby is 2-dimensional.

The numbers throughout the set are references to positions. One may attempt to rearrange the High-Low or substitute the numbers of the initial set with letters or symbols.

But the author of it has found that the results reveal that no matter how it is reconfigured the positions of it remain constant and cannot be extrapolated to predict future events with absolute 100% accuracy. If the outcomes in the set were morphological and time travitic, it would more than likely be 100% accurate.

This is to say that the High-Low expresses direction, available from one position in one direction to another position below the first in the opposite direction.

Indicated Directions

Under the initial number 5, which we assume is the current outcome at the current position, is 4. 4 possess 4 spaces back to 1, while under 4 is 1 - it runs opposing to the number 4, possessing 1 space back to 6. As a prediction indicator in a game of chance, the incorporation of the High-Low into any betting scheme might work out and be fairly handy when the highest number indicator is chosen, but only temporarily. Prediction, as exemplified above goes within the greatest probability of which the current number in the High-Low representing the current number-position above it can go into next.

In the case above the greatest number is 4, while the least is 1.Catastrophe will inevitably set in as a result of the inability of the High-Low to predict future events with 100% certainty.

We have then a fair but accurate means through which to predict succeeding outcomes from a current event, unfortunately the number of possible outcomes is the available number of positions.

Aside from some benefit in gaming, the correspondence is to gravitation delimiting mass and energy through debt, that is it's manual establishment, catalyzes space-time positions to manifest under the control of gravitational constraints, which are of course degrees of freedom.

We might assume that it is energy itself causing this, that lies in it's own polarities coupled to space-time. That is to mean that energy and potential energy are in fact one and the same thing, only that interchange is actually interdependency – meaning both energy and it's origin are not merely in debt or straining against gravity.

Because they are opposites, rather we could interpret these opposites as polarities, as attracting to create that debt, and therefore between the tow is the manifestation of gravity, and thereby degrees of freedom. It would seem then that the debt between energy and potential energy might make sense as the real cause for gravity and not some imaginary part of space-time, but does not make sense when dimensions are considered.

Since the current outcome number is 4, 1 below possesses the highest probability to go from itself (or to repeat) into 4 remaining outcomes to the left plus a repeat, to 1. Below 4 is 1, from 5, the least probability to go from itself to deviate from the higher range to go back to 4 remaining outcomes to the left plus a repeat, to 1. We refer to 4 as having a range of 4 numbers to go into,while 1 possesses 1 number back to 6 to deviate from the range. Hence, the Range to Deviation.

Moving backward from the current position to the left towards 1 in the initial set, we discover that the range to deviation inverts. Where the range transmutes into the deviation and the deviation becomes the range.

Inversion Point

Why does this happen?

Drawing a dotted line down the center of this number set we can see clearly in the High-Low to the left is 2, 3 under 3, while under the number 4 is 3, 2. As we spread out on either side one can view the process as it continues to the left and right ending at the extremes of the two limits of the High-Low representing a line-segment. This line is called the inversion point.

With this particular number set and it’s corresponding High-Low the inversion point is drawn down the midsection parting the corresponding spread-out.

In respect to the High-Low it simulates a typical prediction indicator where the spaces- apart between positions represent the space of space-time, and where the probability of a previous or new outcome represents time.

Once again we are uncertain on how to predict future outcomes with 100% accuracy. Positions relate to energy and energy is in debt to position by gravity. Therefore to predict future outcomes using the High-Low with 100% accuracy, is to solve the High-Low.

In relation to it the High-Low does not translate into morphologistics-because the spaces- apart (and hence the positions) between one number to the next in an out of order set are identical to the distances apart in an orderly set. And no matter what represents the High-Low; be it letters or symbols, the positions altogether remain fixed especially in consideration of space-time with respect to energy.

Let us take another look at the High-Low. If you haven’t noticed it before, you can see that the numbers representing the initial number set possess dual properties running in opposing directions, inverse and opposite to the other.

With absolute perfection the High-Low depicts a line-segment-exactly. A line-segment represents a 2-dimensional segment of space-time (that is two directions instead of 1-dimensional). Being that a line-segment representing actual space-time possesses the property of one thing (that being a single line) in real space-time, how then can a line being possessed of singleness consist of two directions in one?

That is, how are 2 directions combined in a single line? If we refer back to the High-Low representing the initial number set, we can see that from the range to deviation where the inversion point is shown, that the numbers constituting the upper and lower portions of the High-Low running in opposite directions are all fractionated for each position.

How all of this works out to 3D space with the forth being time, i.e.; x,y,z,u is related to what is simply called distance-direction or distance-time substituting the word for space-time. Assuming that for instance that an amount of space is equal to an amount of time in an identity equation similar to that of Ε=mc2.

Where:

```                                  D=cT
```

Indeed if the numbers of the High-Low representing the positions of the initial number set to indicate the spaces-apart, and representing a line-segment in relation to space-time are fractionated, how would this account for 2 directions being in fact one or one distance?

The answer lies in two facts:

1)Energy in debt to gravity whenever manual energy is established and present.

2)Fractionations make the whole and visa-verse corresponding to time’s probability in space.,p> 3)And this indicates the following:

D ≠ cT

Because

D1D2 ≠ d2d1

Since

D1 ≠ D2 ≠ d2 ≠ d1

But

D1<>D2 <>d2<>d1

However in traversement, a body cannot displace in probabilities nor combinations and permutations.

If we were to do so the mass would be able to arrive at any destination and end up just about anytime? No actual sense of direction would then be possible until the mass acquires it’s destination upon reaching a position. Like outcomes of two die never actually possessing the knowledge of what position would be the result.

And with more intersecting line-segments more probable outcomes add to the already existent positions of actual line-segments give many more possible directions. Hence that much more vast space-time to compete with. Therefore the fractionations that make-up the High-Low and therewith constitute distance-direction are both inverse to the other (except the inversion point) make-up the whole from the percent. In more direct terms the fractionations make-up the line-segment as a whole. Considerably too, visa-verse.

Thus both:

D = cT

And

D ≠ cT

Are incorrect while the following applies

D <> cT

Morphologically spaces are considered as chaotic via time from the present to the un-equivalent in the fractionated numbers of the High-Low. Therefore at each position in distance there exists with any other position 1 possibility by 2 directions. Thus the more space, the more distance, the more distance, the more positions (Usu. via Δd), and the more possible outcomes that can actualize for manual energy to gravity.

Hence the more distance-directions the more chaotic it can actually be via time, and with it the hidden fractionations extrapolated from the High-Low making up the whole-and making time as unpredictable from a current position at a current event as there are positions.

However Δd determines these outcomes in time and their in their absence or avoidance time is transcendent because Δd is the establishment of position via loss in energy toward gravity to potential energy. (By virtue of position here) Since E is always in debt to gravity, positions are the result of E in mass whenever the manual operation of it is present and above zero.