Quantum Nanotechnology/Quantum Time Travel

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to: navigation, search

Quantum Time Travel[edit]

Now the only problems left are how to do this. Understand, here, that compression to cause contraction of the particle’s distance or expansion does not affect the interdependency either way.

At every position on the circumference leaving and arrival are occurant. To force the circumference to be more finite by altercations in D to effect the RPS - at c - will only cause the interdependency to occur faster – no time travel – no nothing. It still retains the value of being in the present at any mark-off point indicating RPS about D at c.

Affecting the ω of c won’t do any wonders either because at each position it will go to the past faster to arrive in the now faster. What we have here is a crux where neither ΔD works to cause time travel, nor increments to the value of c because the past leads to the present. And as a note, notice that all visible matter you see macroscopically… remains in the now. Do you understand what is causing it Quantum dynamically?

Why? (I love this Question)

What is the reason for this? And why the lockout by the particle`s mechanics to cause time travel?

Let us refer to this interdependency of time to habitually lock matter into the now by acting as a unit as Transciprocal (trans-reciprocal) motion. Transciprocal motion always leads to the present, no matter how finite the circumferential distance of a thing may be and always at every position on the circumference. Timitically at a macro level this is the reason for positions. Otherwise they would be transcendent via time travel.

That is that arrival NEVER arrives at any position before leaving and cannot no matter the distance, because the values of leaving to the past and arriving to the present are both equivalent. If the value for arrival were to be increased above the value for leaving - arrival would be assumed to transpire before leaving - or at best at the exact time of t1 at all positions but because reciprocation is interdependent to remain in the now, that interdependency would flagrate and cancel like the interdependency of 4-velocity motion, one portion of the wave that results in ν by acceleration to c cannot exist without the other. Thereby locking arrival to leaving to arrival making it not possible to transcend the now.

We can now estimate that the arrival of energy before leaving or exactly is in the now of the past and this raises some more interesting subject matter.

Fortunately and yet unfortunately this is the only way to do this, to force arrival to transpire before leaving - because the RPS in leaving from the present goes back to THE past returning to the present from THE past to THE future.

In assuming that a particle is electric, magnetic- it would be erroneous to pacify any argument that suggests that it is not coupled with Gravity. We may model a particle to any typical configuration of spin-direction, which follow patterns of non-interference.

However being that RPS of D of c is interdependent in GCV where arrival and leaving are equivalent any position via uniform circulation is of course a measurement pertinent to only the imaginary,hence in reciprocation no actual position is really evident. With no position essentially present,the loss in energy aside from decay is avoided by renewal in Ε occurent by D of c in RPS.(At) an exact time where leaving and arrival unite in a present position in the now.

Attempts to isolate to/for THE past to return back to the now invites futility as much as it is impossible to isolate Pe from Ke. It just cannot be done. One can only avoid the other. Where position throughout space-time is contingent when energy in all forms are established - without such used to move would be irrelevant. Ε, in of itself, in it’s normal manifestations can in no sense result in FTL, for in it and by it do constraints result.

Exactly, the reason why the RPS of c about D can traverse to THE past and come back to THE present is entirely due to the fact that ω of c/Ε about the finite D in RPS terms is because the finite circle possesses no position to contend with differentiated from that designated by a mark-off point indicating the RPS by measuring it’s v=c about D.

Making any placement thereof to purpose a base of actual position, as a real base of measurement is purely imaginary and has no basis apart from indication. Motion - back and forth- to and from the present is repetitive or uniformly repetitive, and thus time travitic. The heading of which goes absolutely nowhere - by the interdependency of repetition in the now.

Because space is variable in such laser circles to a fixed speed, indication has it that with less distance (D) in traversion by mass-less energy, by time as it is measured in RPS and straightway changes in response to the variation one with more finiteness to quicken- and with much expanse speed must compensate for the compensation of more space that becomes more unequal to the speed as if to signal a variation above c to variable energy establishment(s) that leave from one position through intervening space (That is assuming intervening space exists between positions) to any other position. (Quantum).

As radical as this appears - we blind ourselves from these concepts because all relativistic measurements originate from the value-based measurements of Pe and Ke. Incidentally for certain Quantum relations of spin may be time dependent at certain finite distances or negligible.

We may refer to such levels of distance expansions and contractions effecting the RPS of c about different finite distances below 1 inch-1 and the compensation required in altering c to compensate for vast distance stretches unequal to c as the difference between the finite and infinite as subspace differentials below mass-less energy or infinite finiteness and infinite in-finiteness.

But position still remains present with energy whenever that energy retains a value approaching 0 and above. Nothing represented by 0, is, at least something while less than nothing (-1) can be estimated as either position-less, avoided by energy renewal in a circle in finite distances of energy or is only applicable in time travel.

Again where:

                                 √ -1 = i

Or as an alternative or perhaps an analogy negative mass has no position that can be said of as existing in/with or to energetic relations because energy being related to mass is valid Ε=mc2, in relationship to position whenever either are incorporated in attempts to circumvent FTL.

Therefore because positional relations manifest with the use of energy, negative mass must possess no positions to contend with also. Which means it is THERE and exists - but it is going to take either time travel to generate it or some other thing of highly advanced technological capabilities.

At every instance where energy is used a block results to cause or violate causality in avoidance of these position(s) to cause time travel in straight - lines even if induced in barrier-less oscillations at the Quantum level. So it becomes immediate to cause it (Or in causality violation effect it) to find it through an absolutely different approach other than energy to manifest the proper means of contending with positions to result in actual time travel. Then Aleodeology.

But how would one generate an equation that does not incorporate energy when all measurement stems from energy in the first place? To get it we are going to need something that does not contend with position(s), similar to the RPS of c about a finite D, but absent of reciprocation. That being almost like converting the rapid rotation of a particle to straight-line displacement.

But would this entail renewal of E? Does not this hint at position-less travel? And does not this indicate the omission of travel altogether? Yes, this is true. First, Let’s investigate what is what in it. One reason why circulation proceeds “nowhere” is because in it’s position-less travel it has nothing to grapple with to go. Such as the rapid rotation of a tire in the absence of a flat surface to travel across as it moves backward to propel a vehicle forward.

With nowhere to go, it is simply a matter of comparison, similar to everyday world examples, such as an organism trapped in quicksand, with nothing for it to grab onto the mass effortlessly sinks or floats as in outer space. No foothold on position.

So what is the answer here?

A spin absent of repeating inputs of increased energy that causes accumulation?

A rapid rotation that does not go nowhere?

Would it be something that doesn’t contend with positions as in a closed time-like line but also does not repeat?

Like two die on felt, all animated objects must repeat within their own degrees of freedom. The organism possesses only so many degrees of freedom and will always find it impossible to extend beyond them without time travel, just as all things do that are possessed of energy and can *willfully move or be forced to move.

So if we are to assume a closed time-like line and move it in all possible degrees of freedom as fast as can be - while reciprocating – it will eventually end all those df by going through all the combinations and permutations to begin repeating them all over again maybe in a different manner than before but eventual unto a repeat just the same. None united and all separate one from another due to Δd with respect to G.

The point here being that each new spin, diversified for all df is done, accomplished and occurs in the now. Light speed or no. Finite distance for a particle or not it does not matter. Does this therefore indicate that a thing, which does not repeat within the degrees of freedom available to it, does not use or access positions?

Degrees of freedom (Positions established with the use of energy and in debt to Pe) surround us everywhere in space-time - a choice you make determines the outcome in the now and this necessitates Δd. As opposed to an alternate choice you could (or could have) made in the now but did not. (An alternate outcome in space-time (different positions)) – but ONLY in relationship to energy corresponding to establishment in it required to do so in space-time. Thus indicating no energy to be established for the second half of the conclusion. If no df is taken then positions are not contended with corresponding to Ε in space-time. Thus signifying, again no energy to be established for the first half of the conclusion. What then would not take df that is not energy corresponding to space-time?

In this oscillatory reference omitting repeats is the omission of returning to an original position - all new or existent? Leaving to a new position? Which is not a return to a prior position, because returning to a previous position in such rapid rotation of a finite particle would indicate a timitic return to the now, provided mass-less Ε.

Leaving then would be travel (from) the now - to continually leave - omitting repeats. What then of the new position at c? Is not this arrival…? How then does the energy leave without returning, our goal being to cause FTL?

  • Again choice and again Δd.

In that being leaving without arrival to any new position (straightway) not involved as a repeat to a previous position would fail? To avoid “arrival” indicates constant leaving. But what does this mean? Is this descriptive? To accomplish this Ε should constantly leave from itself, by-pass or a reduction in/of arrival must occur to leave? In particular this would have to be from the same position,which is a return back to a prior position. Would not then a total ΔΕ have to transpire in relationship to position? Loss in Ε? Reverse?

First, would not the position itself have to be not contended with? To do this repeats would have to be involved, because loss in Ε is necessary where renewal in Ε is causative of it. Hence we are again blocked in straight-line, oscillatory energetic motion. If Ε goes back – it arrives – forward – it arrives. Position to position is made sure. Arrival is at position B back to A, while leaving is A and from B with respect to Ε.


We could (assuming that this were constantly applicable), speed up in leaving by pinpointing the leave time at c. In order to cause the speed-up in leaving to arrival, we would consider a photon as one in which there exists a timitic response to electromagnetic induction.

Consider a photon leaving from position A while arriving at position A opposite in propagation direction. Depiction of the same photon is separate, indicated as in the same position Ρ1. … The related positions it has come from.

Finite Timitic Differential

There would be assumed a cancellation between the two photons, determined by equal and opposite polarizations in the electric and magnetic fields of each.

(Phase conjugate, yet in phase). However no cancellation can happen given that one transpires at a finite time that is different to/from that of the other’s arrival. (Unless from the opposite positions from which they do come - they occur at the exact same instant measured by a *static interval of time).

So cancellation is not seen because of this tiny timitic differential. Then again if the photon, as it is depicted were exactly precise it would indicate simultaneity, and this is not possible without a loss in Ε as in the renewal of Ε in a rapid reciprocal process-therefore if there were no differential then cancellation would transpire as well as simultaneity.

So in an oscillation there are two differentials of time – but coming from different directions. The electric field producing the magnetic field incorporates 4-velocity motion, which allegedly produces the speed of light as magnitude. The 4 - velocity motion originates from the fact that the energy produced exists as a rapid interchange between deceleration into Pe to curl into momentum resulting in Ke. The underlying cause - gravity, again.



Notice although that momentum is not a result of energy, but stems from potentiality due to G, which means degrees of equidistant freedom.

Acceleration (a) leads to a top velocity equal to c where repetitiveness again is engaged. If we could increase this rapid interchange between Pe+ m+ Ke is the effect of increasing a, ν, −ν in the waves of the photon from which the interchange is produced and propagates. And this is done in a particle accelerator. However once we consider the source then it is obvious to see that the source can only function in the present and cannot extenuate itself beyond this speed to venture past light’s (through time) because it operates in the now also by energy where F=Ε.

  • A precise static instant in time underlying a dynamical physical process at which the relative position of a body in relative motion or a specific physical magnitude would theoretically be precisely determined. Time and Classical and Quantum Mechanics: Indeterminacy vs. Discontinuity -Peter Lynds

[In rapid reciprocation about a finite distance in RPS at c, whenever there exists a non-contention of position for a particle spin or spinning photons where acceleration does not exist because of this non-contention, energy that arrives – arrives in an “imaginary position” to an indicated point in the now – with nowhere to arrive to – in the now and no more arrival from the past leaving occurs.]

With this then being true of arrival because the energy has no actual position to contend with then the opposite is true for travel to the past.

[Arrival in THE past DOES NOT occur where no position exists to contend with. (Arrive to/at)

Therefore without a “past now” to arrive to by leaving from the now, arrival to the now must transpire.]

The same photon in the same position (arriving from opposite directions) (Not “A” position) does NOT cancel. What the photon is, as was depicted, are just the two halves of a circle split down the center and straightened.

circle split

If we attempt to take 1 photon and invert it at either end there is still a Δd prevalent. Even if done at the precise center. Thus, for the rapid reciprocation of such a particle of a finite distance the actual position that exists for the particle – devoid of position is of course compensated for as the reciprocation itself. Because it goes back upon itself. Hence the position is the entire renewal back to the same location or at most the position of the particle in space-time as it spins.

And every imaginary position measurable about the entire circumference, arrives and leaves in precisely the now. No real position but always in the now. But as depicted before leaving would be travel (from the now) to continually leave – presumably omitting repeats. And arrival to the new position by leaving is arrival – which in turn is a return to a new position minus the old position.

So if the mass-less Ε goes back to itself – it is arrival – and forward (to another assumed position) it is arrival (straight). The “positions” here are imaginary because a line-segment can stretch add infinitum. So without causality violation leaving in a line-segment can catch up with arrival, pass it up and move back through time. But again a problem of mass interferes with particles and speed is un-incremental because the energy source cannot extenuate itself out of the now.

This is in relationship to energy corresponding to leaving and arriving. The positions are imaginary,and we have a quite complex problem associated with rapid reciprocation where positional relations do not or are not dealt with, except where renewal itself is manifest as the entire position itself. Hence in any case we wind up with an prohibition with energy in relationship to space-time.

With vast distance it is difficult to say how fast, fast is because at c for mass-less energy, it never compensates itself to match the now because it must come from the past. That also of starlight one sees in the night sky is light coming from the past. Although that light is seen in the now as it arrives to the eye it has been displacing over thousands if not millions of years and that travel from there to here does not occur in now. To cover such great distance in the now photons would have to be increased in velocity to compensate for the length of the distance to be unequal or equal to it.

But the distance is really far and unequal to the speed of light so c never approaches now although it remains in the now as it travels.

Weird huh? Very long circular distances of laser light would also take approximately the same time to arrive to the eye – in an arc and then return to it’s point of origin and then again. So we might assume that either the distance involved must be altered to compensate for the lack of speed or alter the speed to compensate for the distance.

However since the distances involved in interplanetary travel are so vast anything that can approach the or even attain the speed of light will not be efficient enough to travel to other world properly because that velocity will be too slow to travel throughout space and visit other worlds with life on them now - and therefore any star ship able to travel at speeds approaching light speed will be found to be too slow for the demands required for interplanetary travel and therefore is worthy only of the garbage.

If induced in the “now” as does the speed of light retains a grip in all possible answers fail in light of energy. Because whatever source is used to do so cannot also extend beyond the now – the force uses energy to generate the force and therefore force is energy.

Thus the solution to i in the equation:

                               √ -1 = i;


                                i = Ρ

Travel in/through time is positionless – arrival and/or leaving in time necessitates position.


Arriving without position leads backward in time. Arrival back in time (previous nows) leads back to the present. Because position is inherent to deceleration and without it in renewal of energy position is nowhere to be found in actuality. So position is compensated for in renewal of Ε through leaving(s) and returning (s) to present time.

No choice or at.

The common denominator in this IS loss in Ε or in reciprocation, the avoidance of loss in Ε, the absence of position therefore is related to stopping or halts to a position which is of course energy in debt to Pe. Or Pe itself. Initially then avoidance of Pe/G is required to not originally (cause) by definition time - (travel) – but by definition it’s absence in renewal but to arrive through the avoidance of position in a diverse time – apart from the now necessitates that it be in that now to arrive,otherwise it CANNOT.

Thus Ε in order to time travel, the avoidance of loss in Ε must be encouraged to avoid position consisting of Pe/G. I believe that it may in fact be the case to transcend positions by renewal in Ε to avoid loss in Ε and there are reasons for this, namely because of matter and mass. But who among us having investigated the subject can explain to you what position consists of apart from automated or pre-programmed information? We know that energy ends a position of Pe by G acting upon the mass.

Whenever energy is established in space-time to propagate in 1 direction, positions naturally and automatically become established due to the fact that it is in resistance to it and that that energy in being established by an external force does not undergo renewal. But what have you in such an oscillatory process? As we know there exists a tiny timitic differential between a photon that arrives at an identical place from opposing directions.

How much more an oscillating laser beam between 2 barriers? With an oscillation involving mass-less energy the result is evident as non-cancellous, and no-closed time-like line can result because an oscillation travels 2 dimensionally (2 directions) thereby prohibiting the avoidance of loss in energy related to position by renewal in energy.

How, mind you, even if one could unite the timitic differences would the oscillation be useful toward interplanetary travel when it may prove impossible to create such an oscillation without two 100% silvered barriers? And further still, the jittery travel would look awfully funny. More coffee? We could although begin such a barrier less oscillation at the Quantum level, very near to an imaginary reference point.

Everything would naturally work out fine until more distance is used provided the energy is forced to become larger. As it does the process breaks down as it approaches the mesio-scopic and the macroscopic. This because the timitic differences in the same space widen, growing farther and farther apart and thereby necessitating that the renewal be sped-up to compensate for every growth in energy to distance. The indication is that for a spinning photon or particle a position in the past would have to be present for the energy to arrive in THE past.

It is safe to assume that all that would be needed to do this is a slow-down of the position-less rotation at precise intervals (pulses, etc?) in/of time when the energy proceeds to go back to past nows from THE now after arriving occurs to THE now and has nowhere else to arrive.(Reader comprehend)

This is against the rapid revolvement of the particle- in the opposite direction to the direction of spin. The best part in this is that this can be done from the imaginary positions in the now.