Jump to content

Root test – "Math for Non-Geeks"

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Let us turn our attention to the root test, which is a powerful tool for proving the convergence or divergence of a given series. It is based off the direct comparison test, in fact we will compare the series with the geometric series ∑k=1∞qk with 0≤q<1.

The root test was first published in 1821 in the textbook „Cours d'analyse“ from French mathematician Augustin Louis Cauchy [1].

Derivation

[edit | edit source]

Recap

[edit | edit source]

We have already learned how to use the direct comparison test with a majorant. In summary, a series ∑k=1∞ak with ak≥0 is convergent, if there exists a convergent series ∑k=1∞bk with ak≤bk.

Furthermore, we know that every geometric series ∑k=1∞qk with q∈[0,1) is convergent.

First derivation

[edit | edit source]

Let ∑k=1∞ak be a series. Also let ak≥0 for all k∈ℕ, because this is a constraint we need for the direct comparison test. For our majorant we need a q∈[0,1) with ak≤qk. Then we have

∑k=1∞ak≤∑k=1∞qk=∑k=0∞qk−q0=11−q−1=q1−q<∞

The series ∑k=1∞ak is convergent by our direct comparison test. The inequality ak≤qk can be transformed:

ak≤qk⟺akk≤q

Thus, if there exists a q with 0≤q<1, so that akk≤q, then ak≤qk and the series ∑k=1∞ak is convergent.

Comprehension question: We start the geometric series ∑k=1∞qk at k=1 and not (as usual) at k=0. Why does this make sense in the above derivation?

In the step ak≤qk⟺akk≤q we take the k-th root, but the 0-th root is not defined, because that would mean q10. This is why k should start at 1.

Bringing limit superior into play

[edit | edit source]

For the convergence behaviour we can ignore the value of finitely many summands. Thus akk≤q must not be satisfied for all k∈ℕ, but for all k∈ℕ, with finitely many exceptions. So the inequality akk≤q must be satisfied for almost all k∈ℕ.

We can restate the requirement, that there must exist a q∈[0,1) with akk≤q for almost all k∈ℕ, using the limit superior:

∃q~∈[0,1):lim supk→∞akk≤q~

Or in other terms:

lim supk→∞akk<1

If akk≤q for almost all k, the succession (akk)k∈ℕ is bounded above and must have an accumulation point less than or equal to q. This accumulation point is equal to lim supk→∞akk and lim supk→∞akk≤q.

Conversely, let lim supk→∞akk≤q for a q∈[0,1). Then for all ϵ>0 the inequality akk≤q+ϵ is satisfied for almost all k∈ℕ. Because q<1 there exists ϵ>0, that is small enough so that q+ϵ<1. Set q~=q+ϵ. We have q~<1 and the inequality akk≤q~ holds for almost all k.

Summary: Instead of akk≤q for almost all k∈ℕ it suffices to show lim supk→∞akk<1, to prove convergence the series.

What about absolute convergence?

[edit | edit source]

What happens if not all ak≥0? Then we cannot use the above argumentation, because for even k and ak<0 the values akk is not defined. But we still have a valid argumentation if we talk about ∑k=1∞|ak|, to show the absolute convergence of the series (from which normal convergence follows immediately). Thus, for series with ak≥0 for all k we have |ak|=ak. In this case nothing changes because for ak we can also use |ak|. The conclusion is:

If lim supk→∞|ak|k<1, then the series ∑k=1∞ak converges absolutely.

Root test for divergence

[edit | edit source]

We have derived the root test to show the convergence of a series. Can we also derive a criterion for divergence? Let us assume that lim supk→∞|ak|k>1. Then for infinitely many k∈ℕ we have the inequality |ak|k≥1. For these k we have |ak|≥1k=1, thus (|ak|)k∈ℕ cannot be a null sequence. But then (ak)k∈ℕ is also no null sequence. From the term test, it follows immediately that ∑k=1∞ak is divergent. We can generalize this case if instead of lim supk→∞|ak|k>1 we require the inequality |ak|k≥1 for almost all k∈ℕ.

Theorem

[edit | edit source]
Theorem (Root test)

Let ∑k=1∞ak be a series. If lim supk→∞|ak|k<1, then the series is absolutely convergent. If lim supk→∞|ak|k>1, then it is divergent. Even if |ak|k≥1 for infinitely many k∈ℕ, the series diverges.

The proof uses the same ideas as the derivation above:

Proof (Root test)

Proof step: From lim supk→∞|ak|k<1 follows the absolute convergence of ∑k=1∞ak.

Let ∑k=1∞ak be a series. If lim supk→∞|ak|k<1, then lim supk→∞|ak|k≤q for a 0≤q<1 (we can choose q=lim supk→∞|ak|k for example).

Choose ϵ>0 small enough, so that q+ϵ<1. From the definition of limit superior it follows that for almost all k∈ℕ the inequality |ak|k≤q+ϵ holds. But that means |ak|≤(q+ϵ)k for almost all k. Since ∑k=1∞(q+ϵ)k is convergent (it is a geometric series with q+ϵ<1) also the series ∑k=1∞|ak| is convergent by direct comparison. So the series ∑k=1∞ak converges absolutely.

Proof step: From lim supk→∞|ak|k>1 or |ak|k≥1 for infinitely many k follows the divergence of ∑k=1∞ak.

Let lim supk→∞|ak|k>1 or |ak|k≥1 for infinitely many k. This implies |ak|≥1k=1 for infinitely many k. But then (|ak|)k∈ℕ cannot be a null sequence and thus (ak)k∈ℕ is also not a null sequence. From the term test we know that ∑k=1∞ak is divergent.

Hint

If (|ak|k)k∈ℕ is convergent, then limk→∞|ak|k=lim supk→∞|ak|k. Therefore, we could also consider the limit limk→∞|ak|k if it exists. This is usually done when proving convergence using the root test.

Limitations of the root test

[edit | edit source]

In case lim supk→∞|ak|k=1 we cannot say whether we have convergence or divergence. In fact there exist both convergent and divergent series that satisfy this equation. First consider the harmonic series ∑k=1∞1k, which is divergent. We have

lim supk→∞|ak|k=lim supk→∞|1k|k=lim supk→∞1kk=lim supk→∞1kk↓ limk→∞kk=1=11=1

But also the convergent series ∑k=1∞1k2 satisfies this equation:

lim supk→∞|ak|k=lim supk→∞|1k2|k=lim supk→∞1k2k=lim supk→∞1k2k=lim supk→∞(1kk)2↓ limk→∞kk=1=(11)2=1

These examples show that we cannot conclude convergence or divergence from lim supk→∞|ak|k=1. In this case we have to employ another convergence criterion!

How to apply the root test

[edit | edit source]
Decision tree for the root test

To apply the root test on a series ∑k=1∞ak we can proceed as follows: We compute |ak|k and find the limit (if the limit exists) or the limit superior.

  1. If lim supk→∞|ak|k<1, then the series converges absolutely.
  2. If lim supk→∞|ak|k>1, then the series diverges.
  3. If |ak|k≥1 for infinitely many k, then the series diverges.
  4. Else, if none of the above is true, we cannot make a statement about convergence behaviour using the root test.

Exercises

[edit | edit source]

Exercise 1

[edit | edit source]
Exercise

Is the series ∑k=1∞k33k convergent or divergent?

Solution

We compute the limit of |k33k|k:

lim supk→∞|k33k|k=lim supk→∞k33kk=lim supk→∞k3k3kk=lim supk→∞kk33↓ limk→∞kk=1=133=13<1

Because lim supk→∞|k33k|k<1 it follows from the root test that the series is convergent.

Exercise 2

[edit | edit source]
Exercise

Is the series ∑k=1∞(4k+52k+3)k convergent or divergent?

Solution

We have

lim supk→∞(4k+52k+3)kk=lim supk→∞4k+52k+3=lim supk→∞4+5k2+3k=42=2>1

Because lim supk→∞(4k+52k+3)kk>1 the series is divergent according to the root test.