Proving discontinuity – "Math for Non-Geeks"
Overview
[edit | edit source]Recall that whenever we want to prove the negation of a statement about some elements of a set, we need to show that there as at least one element in that set for which the statement is not true. So, in order to prove the discontinuity of a function, all you have to show is that the function has (at least) one point of discontinuity. There are several methods available for proving the existence of a point of discontinuity:
- Sequence criterion: Show that the function doesn't fulfill the sequence criterion at one particular point
- Considering the left- and right-sided limits: Calculate the left-sided and right-sided limits of the function at a particular point. If either one of these limits doesn't exist, or if the limits are different, then the function is discontinuous at that point.
- Epsilon-Delta Criterion: Show that the function doesn't fulfill the epsilon-delta criterion at a particular point.
Sequence Criterion
[edit | edit source]
Review: Sequence Criterion
[edit | edit source]A function with is continuous at an argument , if for all squences with and there is:
Sketch of the proof
[edit | edit source]In order to show that a function is discontinuous at using the sequence criterion, we need to find one specific sequence of arguments with for all which is converging to , such that the sequence of function values does not converge to . So there shall be but . In order for to hold, there are two cases to be distinguished:
- The sequence of function values diverges.
- The sequence of function values converges, but its limit is not .
Therefore, a proof of discontinuity using the sequence criterion could take the following form:
- Let be a function defined by . This function is discontinuous at for the following reason: We take the sequence with and all these elements are inside the domain of definition for . This sequence converges to
However, there is . And instead, there is
...Proof that diverges or that the limit of exists and is different from ...
Example exercises
[edit | edit source]Prove discontinuity of the following function:
Discontinuity of means that this function has at least one argument where is discontinuous. For each , is equal to the function in a sufficiently small neighbourhood of . Since is just a composition of continuous functions, it is continuous itself and therefore, must be continuous for all , as well. So we know that the discontinuity may only be situated at .
In order to prove that is discontinuous at , we need to find a sequence of arguments converging to but with . To find such a function, let us take a look at the graph of the function :

In this figure, we recognize that takes any value between and infinitely often in the vicinity of . So, for instance, we may just choose such that is always . This guarantees that - and actually any other real number between and in place of would do the job. But we need to make a specific choice for , and is a very simple one. In addition, we will choose to converges to zero from above.
The following figure also contains the sequence elements beside our function . We may clearly see that for the sequence of function values converges to , which is different from the function value :

But what are the exact values of these for which we would like to have To answer this question, let us resolve the equation for :
So for each with , we have . In order to get positive converging to zero from above, we may for instance choose . In that case:
And we have seen that . So we found just a sequence of arguments , which proves discontinuity of at .
Let with for and . We consider the sequence defined by . For this sequence:
And there is:
Hence, although . This proves that is discontinuous at and therefore it is a discontinuous function.
Epsilon-Delta Criterion
[edit | edit source]
Review: Epsilon-Delta Criterion
[edit | edit source]A function with is discontinuous at , if and only if there is an , such that for all a with and exists. Mathematically written, is discontinuous at iff
General proof structure
[edit | edit source]The Epsilon-Delta criterion of discontinuity can be formulated in predicate logic as follows:
From here we get a scheme that allows us to prove the discontinuity of a function using the delta-epsilon criterion:
Example exercise
[edit | edit source]Prove the discontinuity at for the topological sine function:
In this exercise, discontinuity has to be shown for a given function. This is done by the negation of the epsilon-delta criterion. Our objective is to find both an and an , such that and . Here, may be chosen depending on , while has to be the same for all . For a solution, we may proceed as follows
Step 1: Simplify the target inequality
First, we may simplify the two inequalities which have to be fulfilled by plugging in and . We therefore get: and .
Step 2: Choose a suitable
We consider the graph of the function . It will help us finding the building bricks for our proof:

We need to find an , such that there are arguments in each arbitrarily narrow interval whose function values have a distance larger than from . Visually, no matter how small the width of the --rectangle is chosen, there will always be some points below or above it.
Taking a look at the graph, we see that our function oscillates between and . Hence, may be useful. In that case, there will be function values with in every arbitrarily small neighborhood around . We choose . This is visualized in the following figure:

After has been chosen, an arbitrary will be assumed, for which we need to find a suitable . This is what we will do next.
Step 3: Choice of a suitable
We just set . Therefore, has to hold. So it would be nice to choose an with . Now, is obtained for any with . The condition for such that the function gets 1 is therefore:
So we found several , where . Now we only need to select one among them, which satisfies for the given . Our depend on . So we have to select a suitable , where . To do so, let us plug into this inequality and solve it for :
So the condition on is . If we choose just any natural number above this threshold , then will be fulfilled. Such a has to exist by Archimedes' axiom (for instance by flooring up the right-hand expression). So let us choose such a and define via . This gives us both and . So we got all building bricks together, which we will now assemble to a final proof:
Choose and let be arbitrary. Choose a natural number with . Such a natural number has to exist by Archimedes' axiom. Further, let . Then:
In addition:
Hence, the function is discontinuous at .

