Jump to content

The infinite case – "Math for Non-Geeks"

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world

In order for a set to have a real-valued supremum, it must be nonempty and bounded above. If it is unbounded above, we assign it the improper supremum ∞. Here, we will define what this means exactly. In addition, we will assign an improper supremum and infimum to the empty set.

Improper suprema and infima for unbounded sets

[edit | edit source]

A set M is unbounded from above if it has no upper bound. That means, every S∈ℝ must not be an upper bound, so there is an element x∈M with x>S. That's already the mathematical definition:

Definition (unboundedness from above for sets)

A set M is unbounded from above if it has no upper bound:

∀S∈ℝ∃x∈M:S<x

In that case, M has no real upper bound. We formally assign it the improper supremum ∞ and write

sup⁡M=∞

Attention! The symbol ∞ does not define a real number. So sup⁡M=∞ is not a supremum of M. Instead, it is an improper supremum. The symbol ∞ can be used as an element of the extended real numbers, but it is not a real number and does not obey all the ordinary rules of real-number arithmetic. For example, one may define 3+∞=∞, but one cannot then subtract ∞ from both sides: ∞−∞ is undefined.


Definition (improper supremum)

If a set M is unbounded from above, we call ∞ the improper supremum of M and write

sup⁡M=∞

Warning

The adjective "improper" is important. ∞ is not a real number, and it is not a proper supremum. In case sup⁡M=∞ , the set M has no real-valued supremum, but only an improper supremum!

Analogously for sets unbounded from below:

Definition (improper infimum)

A set M is unbounded below if, for every S∈ℝ, there is an x∈M with x<S. In that case, we write

inf⁡M=−∞

Improper supremum and infimum of the empty set

[edit | edit source]

The empty set also has no real-valued supremum or infimum: We consider M=∅, then a supremum would formally be the smallest upper bound.

Question: What upper bounds does ∅ have?

Consider any S∈ℝ. Is S an upper bound? We have to check whether x≤S for all x∈∅. But there is no x∈∅. So we have nothing to check, and the statement is always true. Hence, any S∈ℝ is an upper bound.

Question: What is the smallest upper bound of ∅?

Any S∈ℝ is an upper bound. So there is no smallest upper bound. Formally, we can go down to −∞ with our upper bounds. So it makes sense to say that, formally, −∞ is the smallest upper bound. However, this is only a formal statement which has to be taken with a bit of caution!

Following the answers to the 2 questions above, it makes sense to define

Definition (improper supremum and infimum of the empty set)

For the empty set ∅ there is

sup⁡∅=−∞inf⁡∅=∞

Again, be cautious: Neither of these is a real number! The set ∅ has no supremum, but an improper supremum, instead. And the same holds for the infimum. Always keep proper and improper suprema and infima strictly apart!