The infinite case – "Math for Non-Geeks"
In order for a set to have a real-valued supremum, it must be nonempty and bounded above. If it is unbounded above, we assign it the improper supremum . Here, we will define what this means exactly. In addition, we will assign an improper supremum and infimum to the empty set.
Improper suprema and infima for unbounded sets
[edit | edit source]A set is unbounded from above if it has no upper bound. That means, every must not be an upper bound, so there is an element with . That's already the mathematical definition:
A set is unbounded from above if it has no upper bound:
In that case, has no real upper bound. We formally assign it the improper supremum and write
Attention! The symbol does not define a real number. So is not a supremum of . Instead, it is an improper supremum. The symbol can be used as an element of the extended real numbers, but it is not a real number and does not obey all the ordinary rules of real-number arithmetic. For example, one may define , but one cannot then subtract from both sides: is undefined.
If a set is unbounded from above, we call the improper supremum of and write
The adjective "improper" is important. is not a real number, and it is not a proper supremum. In case , the set has no real-valued supremum, but only an improper supremum!
Analogously for sets unbounded from below:
A set is unbounded below if, for every , there is an with . In that case, we write
Improper supremum and infimum of the empty set
[edit | edit source]The empty set also has no real-valued supremum or infimum: We consider , then a supremum would formally be the smallest upper bound.
Consider any . Is an upper bound? We have to check whether for all . But there is no . So we have nothing to check, and the statement is always true. Hence, any is an upper bound.
Any is an upper bound. So there is no smallest upper bound. Formally, we can go down to with our upper bounds. So it makes sense to say that, formally, is the smallest upper bound. However, this is only a formal statement which has to be taken with a bit of caution!
Following the answers to the 2 questions above, it makes sense to define
For the empty set there is
Again, be cautious: Neither of these is a real number! The set has no supremum, but an improper supremum, instead. And the same holds for the infimum. Always keep proper and improper suprema and infima strictly apart!
