Jump to content

Telescoping sums and series – "Math for Non-Geeks"

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world

Telescoping series are certain series where summands cancel against each other. This makes evaluating them particularly easy.

Telescoping sums

[edit | edit source]

Introductory example

[edit | edit source]

Consider the sum

∑k=14(1k−1k+1)=(11−11+1)+(12−12+1)+(13−13+1)+(14−14+1)=(11−12)+(12−13)+(13−14)+(14−15)

Of course, we can compute all the brackets and then try to evaluate the limit when summing them up. However, there is a faster way: Some elements are identical with opposite pre-sign.

(1−12)+(12−13)+(13−14)+(14−15)

Every two terms cancel against each other. So if we shift the brackets (associative law), we get

1+(−12+12)+(−13+13)+(−14+14)−15=1+0+0+0+−15=1−15=45

This trick massively simplified evaluating the series. It works for any number n∈ℕ of summands:

∑k=1n(1k−1k+1)=(11−11+1)+(12−12+1)+…+(1n−1n+1)=(1−12)+(12−13)+…+(1n−1n+1)=1+(−12+12)+(−13+13)+…+(−1n+1n)−1n+1=1+0+0+…+0−1n+1=1−1n+1

This is called principle of telescoping sums: we make terms cancel against each other in a way that a long sum "collapses" to a short expression.

General introduction

[edit | edit source]
Telescoping sum: Definition and explanation (YouTube video by the channel „MJ Education“)
Telescoping sums work like collapsing a telescope
A collapsible telescope

A telescoping sum is a sum of the form ∑k=1n(ak−ak+1). Neighbouring terms cancel, so one obtains:

∑k=1n(ak−ak+1)=(a1−a2)+(a2−a3)+…+(an−an+1)=a1+(−a2+a2)+(−a3+a3)+…+(−an+an)−an+1=a1+0+0+…+0−an+1=a1−an+1

analogously,

∑k=1n(ak+1−ak)=an+1−a1

The name "telescoping sum" stems from collapsible telescopes, which can be pushed together from a long into a particularly short form.

Exercise

Prove that ∑k=1n(ak+1−ak)=an+1−a1.

Solution

There is

∑k=1n(ak+1−ak)=(a2−a1)+(a3−a2)…+(an−an−1)+(an+1−an)=(−a1+a2)+(−a2+a3)+…+(−an−1+an)+(−an+an+1)=−a1+(−a2+a2)+(−a3+a3)…+(−an+an)+an+1=−a1+0+0+…+0+0+an+1=an+1−a1

Definition and theorem

[edit | edit source]
Definition (telescoping sum)

A telescoping sum is a sum of the form ∑k=1n(ak−ak+1) or ∑k=1n(ak+1−ak).

Theorem (value of a telescoping sum)

There is: ∑k=1n(ak−ak+1)=a1−an+1∑k=1n(ak+1−ak)=an+1−a1

Example (telescoping sum)

Take the sum ∑k=1n(1k−1k+1) with ak=1k and ak+1=1k+1. We have

∑k=1n(1k−1k+1)=11−1n+1=1−1n+1

Or, putting a −1 in front of everything:

∑k=1n(1k+1−1k)=1n+1−1

Partial fraction decomposition

[edit | edit source]

Unfortunately, most of the sums which can be "telescope-collapsed" do not directly have the above form, but must be brought into it. The following is an example:

∑k=1n1k(k+1)=11⋅2+12⋅3+13⋅4+…+1(n−1)n+1n(n+1)

The does not look like a telescoping sum: there is just one fraction. But there is a trick, which makes it a telescoping sum. For each k∈ℕ we have:

1k(k+1)=1+(k−k)k(k+1)=(k+1)−kk(k+1)=k+1k(k+1)−kk(k+1)=1k−1k+1

So

∑k=1n1k(k+1)=∑k=1n(1k−1k+1)

And this is a telescoping sum. Who would have guessed that ?! The re-formulation 1k(k+1)=1k−1k+1 has a name: it is called partial fraction decomposition. A fraction with a product in the denominator is split into a sum, where each summand has only one factor in the denominator. This trick can serve in a lot of cases for turning a sum over fractions into a telescoping sum.

Telescoping series

[edit | edit source]

Introductory example

[edit | edit source]

What happens for infinitely many summands? Consider the series

∑k=1∞1k(k+1)=(∑k=1n1k(k+1))n∈ℕ

The partial sums of this series are telescoping sums: For all n∈ℕ, there is:

∑k=1n1k(k+1)=∑k=1n(1k−1k+1)=1−1n+1

So the limit amounts to

∑k=1∞1k(k+1)=limn→∞∑k=1n1k(k+1)=limn→∞∑k=1n(1k−1k+1)=limn→∞(1−1n+1)↓ limit theorems=1−limn→∞1n+1=1−0=1

General introduction

[edit | edit source]

Telescoping series are series whose sequences of partial sums are telescoping sums. They have the form ∑k=1∞(ak−ak+1). Their partial sums have the form

∑k=1∞(ak−ak+1)=(∑k=1n(ak−ak+1))n∈ℕ↓ ∑k=1n(ak−ak+1) is a telescoping sum=(a1−an+1)n∈ℕ

To see whether a telescoping series converges, we need to investigate whether the sequence (a1−an+1)n∈ℕ converges. This sequence in turn converges, if and only if (an)n∈ℕ converges. If a is the limit of (an)n∈ℕ , then the limit of the telescoping series amounts to

∑k=1∞(ak−ak+1)=limn→∞∑k=1n(ak−ak+1)=limn→∞(a1−an+1)↓ limn→∞(an+bn)=limn→∞an+limn→∞bn=limn→∞a1−limn→∞an+1=a1−a

If (an)n∈ℕ diverges, then (a1−an+1)n∈ℕ diverges, as well and the entire telescoping series diverges. Analogously, the series ∑k=1∞(ak+1−ak)=(an+1−a1)n∈ℕ converges, if we can show that (an)n∈ℕ converges. In that case, the limit is

∑k=1∞(ak+1−ak)=limn→∞an+1−limn→∞a1=a−a1

Definition, theorem and example

[edit | edit source]
Definition (telescoping series)

A telescoping series is a series of the form ∑k=1∞(ak−ak+1) or ∑k=1∞(ak+1−ak).

Theorem (convergence of telescoping series)

The telescoping series ∑k=1∞(ak−ak+1) and ∑k=1∞(ak+1−ak)converge if and only if the sequence (an)n∈ℕ converges. In that case, the limits are

∑k=1∞(ak−ak+1)=a1−limn→∞an

and

∑k=1∞(ak+1−ak)=limn→∞an−a1

Example (telescoping series)

The series ∑k=1∞((−1)k−(−1)k+1) diverges, since ak=(−1)k diverges.

However, the series ∑k=2∞(9k−9k+1) converges, since the sequence ak=9k converges to 1 . The limit of the series is

∑k=2∞(9k−9k+1)=limn→∞∑k=2n(9k−9k+1)↓ telescoping sum=limn→∞(92−9n+1)=92⏟= 3−limn→∞9n+1⏟=1=3−1=2

Examples

[edit | edit source]

Example 1

[edit | edit source]
Exercise (Partial sums of the geometric series)

The aim of this exercise is to show the sum formula for geometric series without using induction. What we want to prove is ∑k=0nqk=1−qn+11−q for q≠1 and n∈ℕ0. Show that the equivalent statement (1−q)∑k=0nqk=1−qn+1 holds.

Solution (Partial sums of the geometric series)

For n∈ℕ0 and q≠1 there is

(1−q)∑k=0nqk=∑k=0n(1−q)⋅qk=∑k=0nqk−qk+1↓ telescoping sum=q0−qn+1=1−qn+1

Example 2

[edit | edit source]
Exercise

Does the series ∑k=1∞14k2−1 converge? If yes, determine the limit.

Solution

We need a decomposition of the fraction here, if we want to make it a telescoping series. The denominator can be split in two factors, using the binomial theorems:

14k2−1=1(2k−1)(2k+1)

Now, we can do a partial fraction decomposition as above:

1(2k−1)(2k+1)=1+k−k(2k−1)(2k+1)=12⋅(2+2k−2k)(2k−1)(2k+1)=12⋅(2k+1−2k+1)(2k−1)(2k+1)=12⋅(2k+1)−(2k−1)(2k−1)(2k+1)=12⋅(2k+1(2k−1)(2k+1)−2k−1(2k−1)(2k+1))=12⋅(12k−1−12k+1)

Hence, we get

∑k=1∞14k2−1=∑k=1∞12⋅(12k−1−12k+1)=limn→∞12⋅∑k=1n(12k−1−12k+1)↓ telescoping sum=limn→∞12⋅(12⋅1−1−12n+1)↓ limn→∞12n+1=0=12⋅1=12

Example 3

[edit | edit source]
Exercise

Does the series ∑k=1∞2k+1k(k+1) converge? If yes, determine the limit.

Solution

Again there is only one fraction with a product in the denominator, so we attempt partial fraction decomposition:

2k+1k(k+1)=k+k+1k(k+1)=k+1k(k+1)+kk(k+1)=1k+1k+1

This leads us to

∑k=1∞2k+1k(k+1)=∑k=1∞(1k+1k+1)=(1+12)+(12+13)+(13+14)+…

Be careful: This series is not a telescoping series! We have to add summands - not to subtract them. Even worse, the series does not converge at all: The sequence of partial sums (Sn)n∈ℕ is

Sn=∑k=1n(1k+1k+1)≥∑k=1n1k

So they are greater as for a diverging harmonic series ∑k=1∞1k . By direct comparison,∑k=1∞2k+1k(k+1) diverges as well. So partial fraction decomposition does not necessarily produce a telescoping sum, but it can be useful to determine whether a series converges or diverges.

Series are sequences and vice versa

[edit | edit source]

In the beginning of the chapter, we have used that a series is actually nothing else than a sequence (of partial sums) Conversely, any sequence (an)n∈ℕ can be made a series if we write it as a telescoping series: We can write

an=a1+∑k=2n(ak−ak−1)

Question: Why is there an=a1+∑k=2n(ak−ak−1)?

There is

a1+∑k=2n(ak−ak−1)↓ index shift= a1+∑k=1n−1(ak+1−ak)↓ telescoping sum= a1+(an−a1)= an

So a sequence element can be written as

an=∑k=1nck with ck={ak−ak−1;k≥2a1;k=1

The sequence (an)n∈ℕ can hence be interpreted as a series ∑k=1∞ck , where the "series" is seen identical with "sequence of partial sums", here.