Jump to content

Overview: Convergence criteria – "Math for Non-Geeks"

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Decision tree for convergence and divergence of series

We already introduced a series ∑k=1∞ak as the sequence of the partial sums Sn=∑k=1nak. A sequence is convergent, if the sequence of partial sums is convergent . Else, the series is divergent. Assuming the series is convergent, we define the value of the infinite sum of the series ∑k=1∞ak to be equal to the limit of the sequence.

In this chapter, we will study different criteria or tests to determine whether a series is convergent or not. In further chapters, we will study each of these criteria more attentively and give a proof for each.

Criteria for convergence

[edit | edit source]

We will give a proof for the following propositions in the respective main article for the criterion. Let a series ∑k=1∞ak be given. There is an arsenal of criteria to examine convergence:

Absolute convergence

[edit | edit source]


‌

Definition (Absolute convergence)

A series ∑k=1∞ak is called absolutely convergent, if ∑k=1∞|ak| is convergent.

Theorem (Absolute convergence)

If a series is absolutely convergent, it is also convergent. So if ∑k=1∞|ak| is convergent, then ∑k=1∞ak is also convergent.

Example (Absolute convergence)

The series ∑k=1∞(−1)k1k2 is convergent, because it is absolutely convergent. The series of absolute values ∑k=1∞|(−1)k1k2|=∑k=1∞1k2 is convergent.

Cauchy criterion

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Cauchy criterion)

For all ε>0 let there be N∈ℕ, so that |∑k=mnak|<ε for all n≥m≥N. Then the series is convergent.

Example (Cauchy criterion)

The geometric series ∑k=1∞(110)k is convergent according to the Cauchy criterion, because:

|∑k=mn(110)k|=|(110)m+(110)m+1+(110)m+2+…+(110)n|=|(110)m|⋅|1+110+1102+…+110n−m|=110m⋅|1+0,1+0,01+0,001+110n−m|=110m⋅1,111111…1⏟(n−m)-mal≤110m⋅2

Let ε>0. Since limm→∞210m=0 there is N∈ℕ with 210m<ε for all m≥N. For this N it follows from the above that |∑k=mn(110)k|<ε for all n≥m≥N. So we see that the series is convergent according to the Cauchy criterion.

Leibniz criterion

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Leibniz criterion)

If the series has the form ∑k=1∞(−1)kbk and if the sequence (bk)k∈ℕ non-negative monotonic decreasing sequence null sequence , then the series is convergent.

Example (Leibniz criterion)

The convergence of the series ∑k=1∞(−1)k12k−1 follows from the Leibniz criterion, because the sequence (12k−1)k∈ℕ is a non-negative monotonic decreasing null sequence.

Majorant criterion

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Majorant criterion)

Let |ak|≤bk for all k∈ℕ. If ∑k=1∞bk is convergent, then the series ∑k=1∞ak is absolutely convergent.

Example (Majorant criterion)

We have 12k+k3+7≤12k. Since the series ∑k=1∞12k is convergent (with limit 1), the series ∑k=1∞12k+k3+7 is also (absolutely) convergent.

Ratio test

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Ratio test)

Let ∑k=1∞ak be a series with ak≠0 for all k∈ℕ. If there exists a θ<1 and a N∈ℕ, so that |ak+1ak|≤θ for all k≥N, then the series ∑k=1∞ak is absolutely convergent. This is particularly the case, if limk→∞|ak+1ak|<1 or lim supk→∞|ak+1ak|<1.

Example (Ratio test)

The series ∑k=1∞1k! is convergent, since we find that:

limk→∞|ak+1ak|=limk→∞|1(k+1)!1k!|=limk→∞k!(k+1)!=limk→∞1k+1=0<1

Root test

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Root test)

If lim supk→∞|ak|k<1, then the series ∑k=1∞ak is absolutely convergent. In particular this is also true if limk→∞|ak|k<1.

Example (Root test)

The series ∑k=0∞3−k is absolutely convergent, because we have: lim supk→∞|ak|k=lim supk→∞|3−k|k=lim supk→∞3−1=limk→∞3−1=13<1

Cauchy condensation test

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Cauchy condensation test)

Let (ak)k≥1 be a monotonically decreasing, real valued null sequence with ak≥0 for all k∈ℕ. If ∑l=0∞2la2l is convergent, so is ∑k=1∞ak).

Example (Cauchy condensation test)

The series ∑k=1∞1k2 is convergent according to Cauchy condensation test, because the series ∑l=0∞2l(12l)2=∑l=0∞12l=∑l=0∞(12)l is convergent. Recall that ∑l=0∞al is convergent if |a|<1 (here we have a=12<1).

Integral test

[edit | edit source]
Theorem (Integral test)

Let ∑k=1∞ak=∑k=1∞f(k), i.e. ak=f(k) for a function f:[1,∞)→ℝ. If f is a monotonically decreasing function with non-negative values on the domain [1,∞) and if ∫1∞f(x)dx<∞, then the series is absolutely convergent.

Example (Integral test)

The series ∑k=1∞1k2 is absolutely convergent. We define f:[1,∞)→ℝ with f(x)=1x2. This function is a non-negative monotonically decreasing function, and now we can use the Integral test:

∫1∞1x2dx=lima→∞∫1a1x2dx=lima→∞[−1x]1a=lima→∞(−1a+1)=1<∞

Hint

We will give a proof that the Integral test works, after we have introduced Integrals. But for completeness purposes we listed it here. Please note that you can use this test only if it was proved in your lecture!

Criteria for divergence

[edit | edit source]

We are given a series ∑k=1∞ak. To show that this series is divergent, there are multiple criteria:

Term test

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Term test)

If (ak)k∈ℕ diverges or limk→∞ak≠0, the series is divergent.

Example (Term test)

The series ∑k=1∞(k+1k)k is divergent, because we have:

(k+1k)k=(1+1k)k≥1

Thus ak=(k+1k)k cannot be a null sequence, which proves that ∑k=1∞(k+1k)k diverges.

Cauchy Test

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Cauchy-Kriterium)

If there is an ϵ>0, so that for all N∈ℕ there exist natural numbers n~≥m~≥N with |∑k=m~n~ak|≥ϵ, then the series is divergent.

Example (Cauchy Test)

The series ∑k=1∞1k is divergent according to the Cauchy test. Set ϵ=14. For every N∈ℕ we choose m~=N+1 and n~=2N. We then have:

|∑k=m~n~1k|=|∑k=N+12N1k|=1N+1+1N+2+…+12N≥12N+12N+…+12N=N⋅12N=12≥ϵ

Minorant criterion

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Minorant criterion)

Let ak≥ck≥0 for almost all k∈ℕ. If ∑k=1∞ck diverges, then also the series ∑k=1∞ak diverges.

Example (Minorant criterion)

The series ∑k=1∞1k is divergent, since we have 1k≥1k for all k∈ℕ, and the harmonic series ∑k=1∞1k is divergent. In equations:

∑k=1∞1k≥∑k=1∞1k=∞

Quotient test

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Quotient test for divergence)

If |ak+1ak|≥1 for almost all k≥N (i.e. for all k≥K for fixed K∈ℕ), then the series ∑k=1∞ak diverges. In particular, this is the case whenlimk→∞|ak+1ak|>1.

Example (Quotient test for divergence)

The series ∑k=1∞k!2k is divergent. Since we have:

limk→∞|ak+1ak|=limk→∞|(k+1)!/2k+1k!/2k|=limk→∞(k+1)!⋅2kk!⋅2k+1=limk→∞k+12=∞>1

Square root test

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Square root test)

If lim supk→∞|ak|k>1, the series ∑k=1∞ak is absolutely divergent. In particular, this is the case when limk→∞|ak|k>1.

Example (Square root test)

The series ∑k=1∞2kk diverges, because we have:

lim supk→∞|ak|k=lim supk→∞|2kk|k=lim supk→∞2kkkk=lim supk→∞2kk↓ limk→∞kk=1=2>1

Cauchy condensation test

[edit | edit source]


‌

Theorem (Cauchy condensation test)

Let (ak)k∈ℕ be a monotonically decreasing real-valued null sequence with ak≥0 for all k∈ℕ. If ∑l=0∞2la2l diverges, then also ∑k=1∞ak diverges.

Example (Cauchy condensation test)

The series ∑k=1∞1k diverges, because 1k is a monotonically decreasing null sequence and the series ∑l=0∞2l12l=∑l=0∞1 diverges.

Integral test

[edit | edit source]
Theorem (Integral test)

Let ∑k=1∞ak=∑k=1∞f(k), so ak=f(k) for a function f:[1,∞)→ℝ. If f on [1,∞) is a monotonically decreasing non-negative function, and if ∫1∞f(x)dx=∞, then the series is divergent.

Example (Integral test)

The series ∑k=1∞1k is divergent, because f:[1,∞)→ℝ with f(x)=1x is a monotonically decreasing non-negative function, and we have:

∫1∞1xdx=lima→∞∫1a1xdx=lima→∞[ln⁡(x)]1a=lima→∞(ln⁡(a)−ln⁡(1))=lima→∞ln⁡(a)=∞

Convergence is independent of starting index

[edit | edit source]

In the section about the Cauchy test we saw that the starting index is irrelevant for the study of convergence. If we have a series of the form ∑k=1∞ak, then we could also consider the series ∑k=10∞ak or ∑k=4223∞ak. The only difference is the starting index k. This series all have the same convergence behaviour. So remember:

"If we remove or alter only finitely many members of the series, then the convergence behaviour doesn't change."

If we remove or alter finitely many summands, the individual values of the series will change of course, but the convergence behaviour stays the same. This fact is useful, you should always keep it in the back of your head. This could be useful in those cases, where you are not interested in the exact values of the series, but only if it converges or not.

Example

Let (ak)k∈ℕ be defined as follows:

ak={10k;k≤100012k;k>1000

Almost all members of the sequence (ak)k∈ℕ are identical to (12k)k∈ℕ (only finitely many exceptions). Since the series ∑k=1∞12k is convergent, the series ∑k=1∞ak is also convergent, but the exact value of the limit is not the same.