Wikibooks:Reading room/Administrative Assistance

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to: navigation, search
Replacement filing cabinet.svgArchivesWikibooks Discussion Rooms
Discussions Assistance Requests
General | Proposals | Projects | Featured books General | Technical | Administrative Deletion | Undeletion | Import | Permissions | Renaming

Welcome to the Administrative Assistance reading room. You can request assistance from administrators for handling a variety of problems here and alert them about problems which may require special actions not normally used during regular content editing. Please be patient as administrators are often quite busy with either their own projects or trying to perform general maintenance and cleanup.

You can deal with most vandalism yourself: fix it, then warn the user. If there is repeated vandalism by one user, lots of vandalism on a single page, or vandalism from many users, tell an admin here, or in #wikibooks (say !admin to get attention).

For more general questions and assistance that doesn't require an administrator, please use the Assistance Reading Room.

Spammer & Protection Required[edit]

Hello.

Please see IP 209.43.33.204, and its contribution Request you to keep a check on it, and is further Vandalism is done, please block it. The current one has been reverted by myself. The page World History/Civilization and Empires in the Indian Subcontinent requires Protection once more on an urgent basis. Jai Jinendra. Vishal Bakhai - WorksFlag of India.svg 16:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Also for the following User - User:Godzilla25. User put his user id in the edit. I have reverted the edit and have warned the user. Request to keep a tab on this user too. Again Danke Schôn. Jai Jinendra Vishal Bakhai - WorksFlag of India.svg 21:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
The following page New Zealand History/Missionaries, is going through a lot of vandalism, and edit war. Please Protect the page, and look at the IP plagiarising the page: 118.67.197.86. Jai Jinendra Vishal Bakhai - WorksFlag of India.svg 22:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I semi-protected the page for a year. --Pi zero (discusscontribs) 02:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure, if you missed this, but the page World History/Civilization and Empires in the Indian Subcontinent also requires protection, as there are edit wars and insertions within the book (literal war) being done. Pi, if you can look at the same as well. Jai Jinendra. Vishal Bakhai - WorksFlag of India.svg 08:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Fair enough; one-year semi-protected that one also. --Pi zero (discusscontribs) 12:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

copyright ownership[edit]

exactly how does one provide wiki with proof that one is the copyright holder even if the item (a recipe) has been donated to the public domain but happens to appear on a website that has a copyright date on the site (food.com, the copyright is there for the look and feel and the name of the site)

my recipe has been deleted because somebody saw it on food.com and noticed it here as well. It's getting to be a hair's distance to me simply pulling the recipe from everybody entirely and marking yet another thing beneficial to mankind as unsuitable for mankind. Robert Dell (discusscontribs) 00:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Did anyone expressly contested the content license here ? In general we accept your content on your responsibility (as you submit content you become legally responsible for it, and Wikimedia puts all the burden on your if something goes wrong). In case of an actual dispute you can use the normal method of contacting the work's copyright owner and request a license or provide the link to any other place that has "published" the content with a valid (compatible) license or asserting that it is on the public domain. In any case recipes are extremely hard to copyright, it is very easy to bypass by rewording the fluff and keep the non-copyrightable facts, even to improve upon it. --Panic (discusscontribs) 05:05, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
I got a response from food.com
Thank you for contacting Food.com.


This sounds like something you need to ask Wikibooks. Members own the rights to their own recipes on our site.


Customer Support

Food.com: Home of the Home Cook http://www.food.com


::Original Message-----

From: dellr007@yahoo.com (dellr007@yahoo.com)

Sent: Sep 24, 2014 9:17:09 PM Subject: Comment/Suggestion

I posted one of my recipes here and posted it as well on wikibooks. My recipe on wikibooks was summarily deleted simply because your site has a copyright notice on it.
precisely WHAT is copyrighted? surely not my own recipe by itself. if that's the case then it's a super easy way to steal others' work.
I imagine that you copyright the look and feel of the site, the collection of recipes (not a single recipe), and the nutritional information information that you add.
by the way, can you folks kindly remove this from my page? I don't intend to subscribe as my inbox is too full already. I can't see underneath it.
Free Weekly Newsletter
Get the latest recipes and tips delivered right to your inbox.

Your e-mail is safe. Privacy Policy


Shall I include the message ID for you folks to backtrack to determine that it was in fact from food.com and not simply something i typed up?
Robert Dell (discusscontribs) 11:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

This subject is already being covered at Request for undeletion of the recipe. I have moved my last reply there. --Panic (discusscontribs) 08:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

dangerous pages, suggest user get help[edit]

Leucosctite made resources on suicide. I was looking at global contributions and was surprised to see this still continuing. Can someone look at it and suggest the user get help. These edits are still current. -sidelight12

Sidelight12, thanks for raising this concern; it is important that when someone needs help, we try to help them get it.
In this case, evidence suggests Leucosticte's immediate concern is one of content. (I certainly hope that's the case. It occurs to me that our book Suicide probably ought to provide a link to w:WP:EMERGENCY.) The new content has been discussed at Talk:Suicide#Suicide methods, which refers in turn to an earlier discussion at Wikiversity and a history of material moving between now-defunct non-wikimedia projects.
Regarding the content itself, if you're thinking about challenging its appropriateness, you should probably also read as background the two previous, unsuccessful nominations of the book for deletion, which are linked at the top of Talk:Suicide. --Pi zero (discusscontribs) 13:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)