From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection

Jump to: navigation, search

Do you have the entire Opening theory in chess book on your watchlist? It's often very difficult to tell if an edit is valid or not since (although I play chess), the notation seems highly esoteric. Since you're more likely to know if an edit is good or not, if you could help out the RC-watchers by patrolling this book for bad edits, it'd be appreciated. Thanks! – Mike.lifeguard | ^talk 16:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I think I have most of it yes. I'll keep an eye out as best I can. Thanks! ThreeE 22:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] hello

Been working on the theory pages the last few days. You might like to check some of it out, especially Two Knights defence. E5ricky 22:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Very nice -- always good to see new contributions! ThreeE 00:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your invited!

Hello,
As a previous contributor to Chess topics, I'd like inform you of the creation of a new project called Wikibooks:Chess
Recently this project page has been created and it is hoped that you will join.
To overcome issues of communicating, the project has it's own central page and talk area along with navigation system of useful pages and many new features to make communication among users much slicker and easier, including a public chess watchlist. No need to have your own watchlist anymore, one click and you can see all recent Chess edits!
Also added recently is a new opening navigator(See below), a chess diagram upgrade(looks nice), and a chess stub category. All the Opening theory in chess pages now have this built in, that's over 500 pages upgraded.

Hope to hear from you. Regards ChessCreator (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

User talk:ThreeE

From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection

[edit] hello

[edit] Your invited!

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

community

Print/export

Toolbox