User talk:Adrignola

From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection

Jump to: navigation, search
I watch talk pages where I have recently left messages. Please reply in the same section to make discussion easier to follow.
If you leave a message on this page, I'll reply to it here.
Archive
Archives
2009: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12

Contents


[edit] Fishing

after a long bout of inactivity.. I agree that the stub book ought to be merged with the only-slightly less stub book "River fishing". I'm still not sold that his stub book ought to cover something so dang broad as fishing. In fact,Perhaps the whole topic doesn't fit with most users here! some of this disconnect between what I like to do and other people's focus on this site is part of why i'm not so active here in the first place...

BUT... having defined something; I ought to do a better job at it. well, appreciate the comment. I will attempt to talk to the "fishing" author, as well.--JoliePA (talk) 15:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] sorry and wikibooks format guide? wikijunior:whales

wikijunior:whales i guess was incorrect sorry about that but i would like to try and recreate it maybe some could guide me along. thanks 72.73.65.104 (talk) 16:58, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

You may find Using Wikibooks helpful in your endeavors. -- Adrignola talk contribs 17:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Welcome message

Thanks a lot! That's very kind of you! Powerek38 (talk) 13:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Paper money

Hi Aaron,

I notice that you just added a category to Template:Paper money. I know that I'm using it in Adventist Youth Honors Answer Book, and in fact, I created it for use there. However, I tried to make it generally useful so that if someone else wanted to make a book about coin collecting or international currency, or maybe the BSA Merit Badge books, the template would apply equally there. Same thing with Template:Knot and Template:Bible verse. Does tagging it with the book that it's used in really help? I'm not opposed to having it in there - I just don't know that it's the right thing to do.

For example, we would never do that to Template:Stages, because it's more generally used. Does this not fall into the same category? --Jomegat (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

I see your point. I'll put them in Category:Infobox templates for now, until a better category can be determined. It may be good to put usage information on them similar to what you have on Template:Bible verse, as that will make it easier for others to use. -- Adrignola talk contribs 01:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks. --Jomegat (talk) 02:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)