User:Hans Dunkelberg

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to: navigation, search
1998
de-N Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-3 This user can read and write fluently in English.
fr-1 Cette personne peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.
ru-1 Этот участник владеет русским языком на начальном уровне.

Citation[edit]

I agree that Your work is commendable in building a database of reference to prove reincarnation with precise biometric measurements and identification of personality factors, enabling the establishment of accurate matches between reincarnations.

Adrian Finkelstein, physician in Beverly Hills, who wants to have found out details of the life of Marilyn Monroe in hypnotic sessions with Sherrie Lea Laird (>> Videos), and has proven a physiognomical similarity inexplicable without a factor like reincarnation between both Lea and her daugther Kasha on the one side and Monroe on the other, 2009-3-7

Biographical Note[edit]

Born August 22d, 1975, in Mülheim an der Ruhr (Germany), studied 1996-2006 Germanistics, history, geography, law, and ethnology, work on prophetical dreams since 2002 and on reincarnation-like phenomena since 2006

The subjects of my current scientific occupation and the role of this for the Wikipedia[edit]

I have only begun "official" studyings mainly in Germanistics and history, and made reincarnation-like pheonomenons the main subject of my scientific work, in the spring of 2006, after having thought about questions connected to it since about 1992. At the moment, I mainly search in the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries and in the present for parallels between mostly prominent people, after I saw that the overall structure of society has stayed the same as long as since the old stone age (paintings in the style of Franz Marc (1880-1916), Marc Chagall (1887-1985), and Giovanni Battista Tiepolo (1696-1770) resp. Pablo Picasso (1881-1973) in the cave of Altamira), which reassures that a single person is not well-known throughout a society by mere chance, but always reaches quite exactly the same degree of prominence like its predecessors in the sense of a reincarnation-like phenomenon which still has to be explored. This restricts the number of people among who one has to look for a predecessor or a follower in the sense of these phenomenons, decisively. If one once has a well-proven starting point, thus, one can often make progress quite quickly.

For the Wikipedia, this means that we may quicker judge upon the question how broadly we want to depict a certain person from the past or the present, even though the basis of our judgement can not yet been depicted within the Wikipedia itself, so far, because it isn`t yet proven well enough (Mr. Adrian Finkelstein often reminding me of Luigi Galvani (1737-1798), who erred in the single question he got famous through, but drove mankind`s attention to the vast new field of exploration which lies in electromagnetism).

The new phenomenons Mr. Finkelstein, Mr. Walter Semkiw, myself, and others deal with obviously depend on physical forces which are not known so far and are likely to fill the gaps which Einstein couldn`t extinguish from his relativity theory. Thus, our work is likely to bring forward both medicine and techniques like those of power generation, decisively (Mr. Galvani also experimented with frog`s legs, i. e. with biological organisms, like Mr. Finkelstein does).

These newly detected phenomenons have already been sensed by Franz Mesmer (1734-1815), who often reminds me of Mr. Semkiw, because he led a life between scientific speculation on the one hand side and his medical practice on the other, promoting a totally new field of exploration through his hints to phenomenons he called animal magnetism (the most interesting is that both Mr. Galvani and Mr. Mesmer even looked exactly like Mr. Finkelstein and Mr. Semkiw).

In the twentieth century, these so far unexplored layers of matter and energy have caught the attention of physicians namely after the Second World War, when many soldiers were heavily wounded and reported, raving in their pains, of times and geographical regions they couldn`t at all know, but were known by the historians.

Morey Bernstein and Thorwald Dethlefsen were the first who systematically pulled the knowledge of times before their clients` births out of these. Although both of them more or less (Bernstein less, Dethlefsen more) stated that their clients perceived themselves as identical with the people from the past into whose lives they had dived spiritually, I`d say one shouldn`t urge anybody to see things like this. This question is a totally private one, and I wouldn`t like to answer questions on how to act if I "recognize" a big criminal from the past in a contemporary who has not at all got into legal conflicts, so far.

That the structure of society remains the same over thousands of years may be explained by an unconscious exchange of knowledge. A girl, for example, sees her environment through her eyes, and knows certain names from her geographical vicinity. Her future bridegroom gets just these things, and no others (or others not with the same power) sent into his unconsciousness, because the girl has inherited the password to his brain from her (female) predecessor, and the boy has inherited the server from his. The sexual relations of people related to each other through these forces are the core of all the social events. There is a continual readjustment of them between the other events, which group around them. Even though we don`t notice this very widely, such urges go deeply from the conscious layers of our minds into depths which haven`t been explored by the psychologists, so far, because they`re simply too deep. It seems, that we are more intelligent in our subconsciousness, in a sense, than within what we`re aware of. Evolution is the process which pulls these unconscious contents more and more into a conscious realm (the cerebrum).

Like with all other complex systems which can only be judged upon through a general overview, these factors in their mutual way of readjusting each other shew single cases in a new light, sometimes, quite clearly. For example, Sherrie Lea (*1963) is maybe not connected to Marilyn Monroe (1926-1962) in this new sense, because Anne Louise Germaine de Staël (1766-1817) and her friend August Wilhelm Schlegel (1767-1845) reappear in Monroe and Arthur Miller (1915-2005), and it would appear rather awesome to imagine that the social circle around Lea should effectively integrate a figure as much congenial to Miller as the system would demand this.

Of course, it`s a big advantage for a species, if it bundles such an affluent intelligence more effectively than an other, and it seems that reincarnation has been developed by some of our biological predecessors as a quite effective way of doing that. It`s like with companies: if a company rewrote all the software every time it renews its hardware, this would mean a significant loss. But, if the software is transferred to the new hardware automatically — even, if the hardware is suddenly destroyed in an unforeseen process — this will enable the company to plan much farther. Bernstein couldn`t yet bring such comparisons, when he wrote The Search for Bridey Murphy, in the fifties, because there weren`t yet as many computers as today, all over the world, in those days. He compared the processes he had detected to those known from television, which didn`t yet enable him to talk about why resp. how not only single people have stunningly similar followers, but whole families and societies may return in a similarly big likeness.

There is obviously only a restricted number of types like the one visible, for example, in Franz Schubert (1797-1828) and Otto Klemperer (1885-1973), so clearly. This number may be as high as about ten billions, with homo sapiens. My uncle, who has studied biology, says that the biologists, anyway, couldn`t explain why species use to grow only to a certain number of individuals, which they often hold over millions of years. It seems that the reincarnation-like phenomenons we`re dealing with here and which should be treated in the Wikipedia more thoroughly, explain this fact; it seems that these phenomenons also serve to regulate the ecological household. It has, of course, also still to be found out where the borders of such "reincarnating populations" run.

Europe, and partially America and Australia, seem to have reached the point when the intervals between the incarnations (in the above new sense) can`t get much shorter, any more. Dietrich von Hildebrand (1889-1977) and Robert Pattinson (*1986) form the couple with the second shortest interval I`ve found so far; Hector Berlioz (1803-1869) and Leopold Stokowski (1882-1977) are another one with a very short interval.

This stage has been reached by the medical progresses between 1850 and 1900. Since then, incarnations aren`t as short as just a few years, in many cases, any more, which has led to the known growth of the populations of the respective areas, which then, again, stopped.

I`m just comparing several people to figure out how far one may find measurable qualities connecting them. Among these people are Buddha ~ Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Pius II ~ Pius IX ~ Benedict XVI, Boniface VIII ~ Julian Assange, Dietrich von Hildebrand ~ Robert Pattinson, Christopher Columbus ~ Neil Armstrong, Pedro Álvares Cabral ~ Michael Collins, Ferdinand Magellan ~ Charles Conrad, Heraclides Ponticus ~ Ernst Haeckel ~ Craig Venter, Giovanni Domenico Cassini ~ Wernher von Braun, Benjamin Franklin ~ Thomas Alva Edison ~ James Dyson, Carl Linnaeus ~ Charles Darwin, Isaac Newton ~ Werner Heisenberg, di Lasso ~ Mozart ~ Arnold Schönberg, Monteverdi ~ Beethoven ~ Alban Berg, Vivaldi ~ Dvořák ~ David Buckley, Telemann ~ Anton Bruckner, Bach ~ Wagner ~ Michael Jackson, Händel ~ Gustav Mahler, Gluck ~ Richard Strauss, Haydn ~ Karel Ančerl, Johann Christoph Friedrich Bach ~ Viktor Ullmann, Boccherini ~ John Lennon, Corona Schröter ~ Rihanna, Hummel ~ Paul McCartney, Weber ~ Wilhelm Furtwängler, Rossini ~ Christophe Beck, Schubert ~ Otto Klemperer, Berlioz ~ Leopold Stokowski, Schumann ~ Erich Kleiber, Mendelssohn ~ Anton Webern, Chopin ~ Maurizio Pollini, Liszt ~ Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli, Verdi ~ Brian Tyler, Rubinstein ~ Trevor Rabin, Brahms ~ Hans Zimmer, Grieg ~ Herbert Grönemeyer, Debussy ~ Thomas Newman, Neferefre ~ Napoleon Bonaparte ~ Harry S. Truman, Hatchepsut ~ Hillary Clinton, Ramesses II ~ Perikles ~ Augustus ~ Mark Aurel ~ Charlemagne ~ Cosimo de’ Medici ~ Jean-Baptiste Colbert ~ the Freiherr vom Stein ~ Konrad Adenauer / Aspasia ~ Gussie Zinsser, Alkuin ~ Wilhelm von Humboldt ~ Theodor Heuss, Peter the Great ~ Lenin / Catherine I of Russia ~ Nadezhda Krupskaya, Catherine the Great ~ Alexandra Kollontai, James Madison ~ Barack Obama / Dolley Madison ~ Michelle Obama, Robert Peel ~ Henry Mountbatten-Windsor, John Tyler ~ John Major / Letitia Christian Tyler ~ Norma Major / Julia Gardiner Tyler ~ Edwina Currie, Andrew Johnson ~ Lyndon B. Johnson, James Garfield ~ Al Gore, Agostino Barbarigo ~ John Jay ~ Rudy Giuliani, Leonardo Loredan ~ Michael Bloomberg, Qin Shi Huang ~ the Emperor Wu of Han ~ Mao Zedong, the Qianlong Emperor ~ Chiang Kai-shek, Lorenzo de' Medici ~ Arnold Schwarzenegger, Louis XIV of France ~ Ludwig Erhard, George Canning ~ George F. Kennan, Frederick II of Prussia ~ Helmut Schmidt, Friedrich von Gentz ~ Friedrich Ebert / Fanny Elßler ~ Louise Ebert, Frederick William III of Prussia ~ Heinrich Lübke / Auguste von Harrach ~ Wilhelmine Lübke, Karl August von Hardenberg ~ Kurt Georg Kiesinger, Homer ~ Aristotle ~ Jesus, Aristophanes ~ Veronese ~ Molière ~ Pierre Beaumarchais ~ Charles Chaplin, Cicero ~ Rembrandt ~ Goethe ~ Rudolf Steiner, Saskia van Uylenburgh ~ Friederike Brion ~ Anna Steiner / Hendrickje Stoffels ~ Christiane von Goethe ~ Marie Steiner, Alexander Pushkin ~ Stanislawski / Natalia Pushkina ~ Lilina Stanislawski, Mikhail Lermontov ~ Maxim Gorky, Dante Alighieri ~ Enrique de Villena ~ Ludovico Ariosto ~ William Shakespeare ~ Henry Fielding ~ Henrik Ibsen ~ James Cameron, Charles Baudelaire ~ Blake Nelson, Christopher Marlowe ~ Christopher Nolan, John Donne ~ T. S. Eliot, Walter Scott ~ Galsworthy, Edgar Allan Poe ~ Peter Jackson, Charles Dickens ~ Sylvester Stallone, Lewis Carroll ~ Tim Burton, Mark Twain ~ Quentin Tarantino, Oscar Wilde ~ Nicolas Cage, Henry Edwards ~ Sam Worthington, Quinault ~ Keats ~ Buster Keaton, Denis Diderot ~ Jimmy Wales, Jean le Rond d'Alembert ~ Larry Sanger, Kant ~ Martin Heidegger, Fichte ~ Edmund Husserl, Hegel ~ Scheler ~ Stephen Dorff, Konrad Ekhof ~ Sebastian Koch, Klopstock ~ Carl Zuckmayer, Lessing ~ Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, Sophie von La Roche ~ Katie Holmes, Wieland ~ Gerhart Hauptmann, Lichtenberg ~ Egon Friedell, Charlotte von Stein ~ Lady Gaga, Pestalozzi ~ Hartmut von Hentig, Friedrich Justin Bertuch ~ Emil Molt, Bürger ~ Franz Kafka, Lenz ~ Egon Erwin Kisch, Klinger ~ Franz Werfel, Hebel ~ Rolf Hochhuth, Johann Friedrich Cotta ~ James Murdoch, August Wilhelm Schlegel ~ Arthur Miller / Anne Louise Germaine de Staël ~ Marilyn Monroe, Karl Morgenstern ~ Klaus Albrecht Schröder, Friedrich Christoph Perthes ~ Samuel von Fischer, E. T. A. Hoffmann ~ Gustav Meyrink, Friedrich Christoph Schlosser ~ Gerhard Dobesch, Achim von Arnim ~ William Scott Pyle / Bettina von Arnim ~ Mieta Pyle-Waller, Karl August Varnhagen von Ense ~ Ibrahim Komoo / Rahel Varnhagen von Ense ~ Mazlan Othman, Paulus Modestus Schücking ~ Michael Douglas / Katharina Sibylla Schücking ~ Catherine Zeta-Jones, Levin Schücking ~ Cameron Douglas, Eichendorff ~ Max Brod, Raimund ~ Curt Goetz, Annette von Droste-Hülshoff ~ Mia Wasikowska, Adalbert Stifter ~ George Clooney, Karl May ~ Clint Eastwood, Gustave Eiffel ~ Anish Kapoor, Johann Bernhard Fischer von Erlach ~ Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Karl Friedrich Schinkel ~ Adolf Meyer, Gottfried Semper ~ Oscar Niemeyer, a man who painted in the cave of Altamira in the stone age ~ Marc Chagall, another man who painted in the cave of Altamira in the stone age ~ Franz Marc, another man who painted in the cave of Altamira in the stone age ~ Giovanni Battista Tiepolo ~ Pablo Picasso, Sandro Botticelli ~ Jan Steen ~ Herder ~ Friedrich Rittelmeyer / Maria Karoline Flachsland ~ Julie Rittelmeyer, Lucas Cranach the Elder ~ Thomas Mann ~ Oliver Henkel, Raphael ~ Novalis, van Dyck ~ Schiller ~ Emil Bock, François Boucher ~ Spencer Tunick, Caspar David Friedrich ~ Otto Dix.

Is Jimmy Wales (*1966) Denis Diderot (1713-1784)?

I have had to depict these phenomenons here a little more thoroughly, because they`re just in the process of being explored, but, at the same time, already strongly influence my opinion about which parts of the Wikipedia should be paid how much attention to. Within the last months, a further, and similar, phenomenon has been added to them for me which I`d like to call reinlocation. Not just people seem to be followed by people who have to deal with the same subjects, but also whole geographical regions seem to be followed by congenial (and often much bigger) other regions. In the development of the Western civilization, it seems that roughly every two thousand years there unfolds an especially strong and coherent double-culture, within which the junior region assumes control after five hundred years, this being followed by a further five-hundred-years phase of decay, and this by a phase without an equally strong civilization, which lasts about one thousand years. From 2500 to 1500 B.C., there unfolded, and declined, the Old and the Middle Kingdom of Egypt, from 500 B.C. to 500 A.D., the civilization of the Greco-Roman world, and from 1500 to 2500 A.D., there, so far, is evoked the impression that it had been, and would be, just alike, with the European-American civilization of today. It even seems as if some deity resp. some deities had prepared the very geological situation on the Earth for this course of events, as the Mediterranean Basin is in fact, though a little hidden through superficial variations, an image of the Earth as a whole, Italy standing for North America, Sicily for South America, the Apulian peninsula for Florida, Taranto for New Orleans, Venice for New York City, Milan for Chicago, Genova for Vancouver, La Spezia for Seattle, Florence for San Francisco, Rome for Los Angeles, Vatican City for Hollywood, Naples for Mexico City, Mount Vesuvius for the Popocatepetl, the Adriatic Sea for the Atlantic Ocean, the western part of the Mediterranean Sea for the Pacific Ocean, the Balearic Islands for Japan, Sardinia for Australia, Corsica for New Guinea, Elba for Hawaii, the Gulf of Corinth for the Mediterranean Sea, the Peloponnese for Africa, Crete for Java, the Aegean Islands for the Philippines and the Indonesian islands. The variations occuring here refer mainly to some islands and peninsulas and bigger national regions like Cuba, China, India, Great Britain, and others, which seem to have been omitted due to the impossibility to integrate their populations into that small antique Mediterranean system. I try to trace down the parallels between the two systems which can be observed here as far down as to single people. Of course, it`s also interesting to ponder how all this could be organized biologically and sociologically, resp. in the sense of science fiction, and even more, how it is going to continue in the future, my expectation for the milleniums lying ahead of us being at the moment that the next double-culture (3500-4500 A.D.) could cover the northern und the southern polar regions, the next but one (5500-6500) Earth and Venus (this having a gravity which is less than ten percent weaker than that of the Earth), the following one Uranus and Neptune, which both have a gravity just slightly stronger than that of the Earth on the top of their outer gas layers, which could be encased, still a little bit higher, with the help of carbon nanotubes, or similar materials, thus providing a vast space for humanity to populate with a gravity which could even be varied by changing from a higher storey of the carbon nanotube case to a lower resp. the other way round. Once we`ve accepted that all this will probably really happen — the "inexplicable" parallels between the Mediterranean Basin and the whole world in mind! — we should also accept that we will probably manage to encase Jupiter and Saturn, as well, with cases in even higher altitudes, where the strong gravity of these planets will not be palpable so strongly, any more. As these parallels continue even into the stellar and into the galactical realms — Alpha Centauri consisting of two stars nearly exactly like the sun, and in a convenient distance of each other, the Andromeda Galaxy being a galaxy nearly exactly like the Milky Way — we will have to accept that mankind will one day very probably even settle the whole universe. As I'm interested in the question how one could overcome the vast distances within this, I also often edit articles on the respective subjects, like, for example, poltergeist, Rosenheim Poltergeist, and others.