Topology/Separation Axioms

From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Separation Axioms for Topological Spaces

A topology on a space is a collection of subsets called open. We can then ask questions such as "can we separate any two distinct points in the space by enclosing them in two disjoint open sets?" For the real line with its usual topology, the answer is obviously yes, but there are spaces for which this is not so. It turns out that many properties of continous maps one could take for granted depend, in fact, on one of the conditions stated below holding. Topological spaces are classified according to which such conditions, called separation axioms, happen to hold.

Let (X,\mathcal{T}) be a topological space, and let x,y be any two distinct points in that space. The following conditions, ordered from least to most restrictive, are ones we may wish to place on (X,\mathcal{T}):

T0 
For every x, y, there exists an open set O that contains one point of the pair, but not the other.
T1 
For every x, y, there exist open sets O1 and O2, such that O1 contains x but not y and O2 contains y but not x.
T2 
For every x, y, there exist disjoint open sets O1 and O2, such that O1 contains x and O2 contains y. T2 spaces are also called Hausdorff spaces.
T 
For every x, y, there exist disjoint closed neighborhoods O1 and O2 of x and y respectively.
regular 
If C is a closed set, and z is a point not in C, there exist disjoint open sets O1 and O2, such that O1 contains C and O2 contains z. A topological space that is both regular and T1 is called T3.
completely regular 
If C is a closed set, and z is a point not in C, there exists a continuous function f:X\rightarrow[0,1] such that f(z)=0 and for any w\in C, we have f(w)=1 (i.e. f(C)={1}). A topological space that is both completely regular and T1 is called T.
normal 
If C1 and C2 are disjoint closed sets, there exist disjoint open sets O1 and O2, such that O1 contains C1 and O2 contains C2. A topological space that is both normal and T1 is called T4.
completely normal 
Let C1 and C2 be separated sets, meaning that \mathrm{Cl}(A)\cap B=A\cap\mathrm{Cl}(B)=\O. Then there exist disjoint open sets O1 and O2, such that O1 contains C1 and O2 contains C2. A topological space that is both completely normal and T1 is called T5.
perfectly normal 
If C1 and C2 are disjoint closed sets, there exists a continuous function f:X\rightarrow[0,1] such that f - 1({0}) = C1 and f - 1({1}) = C2. A topological space that is both perfectly normal and T1 is called T6.

NOTE: Many authors treat regular, completely regular, normal, completely normal, and perfectly normal spaces as synonyms for the corresponding Ti property.

[edit] Relations among the Separation Properties

The Ti separation properties (axioms) form a hierarchy, such that if i>j, then property Ti implies property Tj. When property Ti+1 implies Tx, which in turn implies Ti, and Tx was proposed after Ti and Ti+1, Tx is designated T. Other implications of these properties include:

  • Complete regularity always implies regularity, even without assuming T1;
  • T0 alone suffices to make a regular space T3. The full T1 property is unnecessary;
  • Perfect normality implies complete normality, which in turn implies normality;
  • A topological space is completely normal if and only if every subspace is normal.

[edit] Exercises

  1. Suppose that a topological space X is T1. Given x\in X, show that X\setminus\{x\} is open to conclude that X is closed.
  2. Given a topological space X, and given that for all x\in X, {x} is closed, show that X is T1.

[edit] Some Important Theorems

[edit] Theorem 3.1.2

Let X be a T2 space and let sn be a sequence in X. Then sn either does not converge in X or it converges to a unique limit.

Proof
Assume that sn converges to two distinct values x and y.

Since X is T2, there are disjoint open sets U and V such that x\in U and y\in V.

Now by definition of convergence, there is an integer M such that n\geq M implies s_n\in U. Similarly there is an integer N such that n\geq N implies s_n\in V.

Take an integer K that is greater than both M and N, so that sK is in both U and V, contradicting the fact that the two sets are disjoint. Therefore sn cannot converge to both x and y. \square

[edit] Theorem 3.1.3

If X is a metric space, then X is normal.

Proof

Given any A\subset X, and any point x\in X, define the distance, d(x,A) from x to A by d(x,A):=\inf\{d(x,a)|a\in A\}, where d(x,a) is the distance function supplied by definition of a metric space. Observe that x\mapsto d(x,A) is continuous.

Fix closed, disjoint subsets A,B of X, and define f:X\rightarrow [-1,1] by f(x):=\frac{d(x,B)-d(x,A)}{d(x,A)+d(x,B)}. (Note f well--defined, since for any S\subset X, we have d(x,S) = 0 iff x in the closure of S.) Observe f is 1 on A, -1 on B, and in the open interval ( − 1,1) elsewhere. Also, f continuous by the continuity of x\mapsto d(x,A). Therefore, f^{-1}([-1,-1/2))\supset B and f^{-1}((1/2,1])\supset A are the preimages of open sets (open in [ − 1,1], that is) and therefore open, and they're disjoint as the preimages of disjoint sets.

[edit] Theorem 3.1.4

If X is a metric space, then X is Hausdorff.
Proof
Let x and y be two distinct points, and let d=\tfrac{d(x,y)}{3}. Then Bd(x) and Bd(y) are open sets which are disjoint since if there is a point z within both open balls, then d(x,y)\leq d(x,z)+d(x,z)<\tfrac{2}{3}d(x,y), a contradiction.

[edit] Urysohn's Lemma

A topological space X is normal if and only if for any disjoint closed sets C1 and C2, there exists a continuous function f:X\rightarrow[0,1] such that f(C1) = {0} and f(C2) = {1}.

Proof
In order to prove Urysohn's Lemma, we first prove the following result:

Let X be a topological space. X is normal if and only if for every closed set U, and open set V containing U, there is a set S containing U whose closure is within V.

Suppose that X is normal. If V is X, then X is a set containing U whose closure is within V. Otherwise, the complement of V is a nonempty closed set, which is disjoint from U. Thus, by the normality of X, there are two disjoint open sets A and B, where A contains U and B contains the complement of V. The closure of A does not meet B because all points in B have a neighborhood that is entirely within B and thus does not meet A (since they are disjoint), so all points in B are not within the closure of A. Thus, the set A is a set containing U, and whose closure does not meet B, and therefore does not meet the complement of V, and therefore is entirely contained in V. Conversely, take any two disjoint closed sets U and V. The complement of V is an open set containing the closed set U. Therefore, there is a set S1 containing U whose closure is within the complement of V, which is the same thing as being disjoint from V. Then the complement of V is an open set containing the closed set Cl(S1). Therefore, there is a set S2 containing S1 such that Cl(S2) is within the complement of V i. e. is disjoint from V. Then S1 and the complement of S2 are open sets which respectively contain U and V, which are disjoint.

Now we prove Urysohn's Lemma.

Let X be a normal space, and let U and V be two closed sets. Set U0 to be U, and set U1 to be X.

Let U_{\frac{1}{2}} be a set containing U_0 whose closure is contained in U1. In general, inductively define for all natural numbers n and for all natural numbers a < 2n − 1

U_{\frac{2a+1}{2^n}} to be a set containing U_{\frac{a}{2^{n-1}}} whose closure is contained within the complement of U_{\frac{a+1}{2^{n-1}}}. This defines Up where p is a rational number in the interval [0,1] expressible in the form \frac{a}{2^n} where a and n are whole numbers.

Now define the function f:X \rightarrow [0,1] to be f(p)=inf{x|p \in U_x}.

Consider any element x within the normal space X, and and consider any open interval (a,b) around f(x). There exists rational numbers c and d in that open interval expressible in the form \frac{p}{2^n} where p and n are whole numbers, such that c<f(x)<d. If c<0, then replace it with 0, and if d>1, then replace it with 1. Then the intersection of the complement of the set Uc and the set Ud is an open neighborhood of f(x) with an image within (a,b), proving that the function is continuous.

Conversely, suppose that for any two disjoint closed sets, there is a continuous function f from X to [0,1] such that f(x)=0 when x is an element of U, and that f(x)=1 when x is an element of V. Then since the disjoint sets [0,.5) and (.5,1] are open and under the subspace topology, the inverses f − 1([0,.5)), which contains X, and f − 1((.5,1]), which contains Y, are also open and disjoint.


[edit] Exercises

It is instructive to build up a series of spaces, such that each member belongs to one class, but not the next.

  • The indiscrete topology is not T0.
  • If X is the unit interval [0;1], and \mathcal{T} = \{ [0,x) | x\in [0,1] \}, then this space is T0 but not T1.
  • Consider an arbitrary infinite set X. Let X and every finite subset be closed sets, and call the open sets Ω. Determine whether (X,Ω), is a topological space which is T1 but not T2. Hint: Consider the intersection of any two open, non-empty sets.

Verify that

  • T1 implies T0
  • T2 implies T1
  • T3 implies T2 (hint: use theorem 3.1.1)