Talk:Relationships/Hormones

From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection

The article seems to have been handled with kid gloves by a homophobic child who most likely was and/or may still be a virgin. The paper is lacking in transitions and appears to be poorly paraphrased citations. The citations look like they were misconstrued and without sufficient context can give the reader a false impression of the material. Footnote 71 is by far the most stupid citation. Not only is this article opinionated---it's ridiculous. I suggest researching the material independently and thoroughly.