Talk:Poker

From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection

I suppose I should have included this site in my due diligence for setting up PokerWiki. What is the consensus for the appopriate scope of PokerWiki versus Wikibooks:Poker? While I'm hoping PW grows into more than a manual for playing -- and indeed, the earliest traffic has been heaviest in our Casinos section, documenting what games are available where -- I also realize there's some potential for overlap, and I wouldn't want to duplicate efforts. Thoughts, anyone?

Cheers, PhilipR - 63.81.205.21 18:05, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Apparently no one else is bothered by duplication so I guess I won't worry about it. - PhilipR. 71.192.214.166 22:11, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

I think the goals of the two projects are somewhat different. Plus, some people might feel that they'd rather work with the Wikimedia Foundation. -- bkuhn 21:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Contributors to this book may be interested in making Transwiki:Four Corners Solitaire into a book (or part of one). – Mike.lifeguard | ^talk 03:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)