50% developed

TPACKing for a Wonderful Educational Trip

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Source: http://tpack.org/

Introduction[edit | edit source]

This is a project that was begun in Dr. Leigh Zeitz's Spring 2012 graduate class: "Coordinating Technology in an Educational Environment." It has been extended by Dr. Z's Spring 2014 Coordinating Technology course as well.

Technology-Rich Learning Environments (TRLEs) improve learning opportunities. As students become more comfortable using technology to learn, they will be better prepared to transition from high school into the workplace. Education of students is not based on technology; rather, it is using technology to enhance learning experiences. Since equipment and operating systems quickly become obsolete, technologically literate students will be able to apply skills learned in one platform to determine adaptive actions when encountering similar programs. Mastering the subject matter should be the target when integrating technology and managing equipment life-cycles.

Our graduate cohort believes that 1:1 environments allow educators to approach education in a whole new way. Computers cannot simply be “added” to the current educational paradigm. Educators need to re-evaluate and re-think how best to prepare students for their futures. In fact, we believe that students must be permitted to take a greater share of responsibility for their own learning. We believe that when technology is truly integrated, students will see technology as they “see” a pencil - as a tool needed to complete projects.

Pedagogical, technological, and subject matter expertise (TPack) are equal parts in well-designed project (or problem) based learning activities. The most successful teachers have always blended these parts. With the speed of technological advances and the increased collaborative spirit in today's environment, conscious efforts to create shared learning activities have occupied a large portion of this term's class.

This Wikibook provides concrete resources that model TPaCK principles to illustrate how this new paradigm is actually an update of good teaching throughout the history of education. Finding real-world problems for students to analyze, creatively solve, and evaluate in the manner that is most accessible for each learner is a goal for which all educators strive.

What is TPaCK?[edit | edit source]

Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) attempts to identify the knowledge required by teachers to integrate technology in their teaching, the content knowledge needed to be successful teaching a particular subject, and the knowledge of the best pedagogical approach share the information. As the figure above illustrates there is a complex interplay among the knowledge forms. The TPaCK framework builds on Shulman’s idea of Pedagogical Content Knowledge, and it was developed by Punya Mishra and Matthew J. Koehler.

Incorporating TPaCK[edit | edit source]

As part of the University of Northern Iowa's Spring 2012 Coordinating Technology in an Educational Setting class, groups constructed 1:1 technology plans for schools - real, fictitious, or blended. The groups chose hardware, wrote grants, planned professional development, and created lessons designed to efficiently and effectively integrate pedagogy, technology, and subject matter (aka TPaCK). TPaCKing in this wikibook uses the Iowa Core Curriculum and focuses on essential 21st Century skills, standards, and benchmarks.

Technological Knowledge[edit | edit source]

In planning each lesson, individual designers chose technology that they knew would effectively integrate into the unit. Technology was chosen to enhance the learning process and provide students creative control and the opportunity to collaborate with peers.

Pedagogical Knowledge[edit | edit source]

The guidelines that groups followed regarding pedagogy are modeled after the Iowa Core Curriculum (Characteristics of Effective Instruction), which are detailed below.

Student-Centered Classrooms
Students are directly involved and invested in the discovery of their own knowledge. Through collaboration and cooperation with others, students engage in experiential learning which is authentic, holistic, and challenging. Students are empowered to use prior knowledge to construct new learning and develop meta cognitive processes to reflect on their thinking.
Teaching For Understanding
Students engage in a variety of thought-provoking activities such as explaining, finding evidence and examples, generalizing, applying, making analogies, and representing the topic in new ways. Teachers make learning a long-term, thinking-centered process; engage students in assessment for learning processes; support learning with representations and conceptual models; teach for learner differences; induct students into the discipline; and teach for transfer (Perkins, 1993).
Assessment For Learning
Process used by teachers and students provides feedback adjusting teaching and learning to improve students’ achievement of core content. Formative assessment practices provide students with clear learning targets, examples, and models of strong and weak work, regular descriptive feedback, and the ability to self-assess, track learning, and set goals.
Rigor And Relevance
Lessons are cognitively demanding and challenge students to apply essential concepts and skills to real-world, complex and open-ended situations. Content is linked to core concepts or skills and requires authentic work, discipline-specific methods, and applying what is known or being learned to solve complex problems. Involves use of prior knowledge, development of in-depth understanding, and the ability to develop and express ideas and findings through elaborated communication.
Teaching For Learner Differences
Planning for and responding to variances among learners creates the best learning experience possible. These principles are part of Universal Design for Learning or UDL. This planning includes processes to determine the effectiveness of instruction, the use of data to guide instructional decision-making, and safeguards to insure access for all students.

Content Knowledge[edit | edit source]

Contact your local subject matter expert!


Groups[edit | edit source]

The Mitchell School for Performing Arts (Team J B D W M)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing Music History

BMK High School (Meet the Teachers)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing Secondary English/Language Arts Skills

Dream High School (3 Girls and a Guy)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing 21st Century Skills

Panther High School (The Fightin' Fourth)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing Secondary Language Arts

MCCL School (Team MCCL)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing 7th Grade Literacy

JaJoSa Elementary School (The TechSperts)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing 3rd Grade Language Arts

Norman Borlaug Community School District (Amy, Randon, and Heather)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing 21st Century Skills

John T. Nash Elementary School (Kelsey, Mindy, Andi)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing K-4 ELA Common Core

William Heights Elementary School (Ashley, Mel, and Amber)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing 3-5 Literacy

TriState Middle School (Marija, Tyler, Kirstin and Ann)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing 8th Grade Social Studies

Iowa Tech High School (Jeremy, Jarod, Brian, Samir & Tyler)[edit | edit source]

TPACKing 9-12 Economics

Contributors[edit | edit source]

General Editor - Linda Engel

Dr. Z's TPackers' Biographies

References[edit | edit source]

References