Ring Theory/Rings

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
< Ring Theory
Jump to: navigation, search

We will start by the definition of a ring.

Definition 1: A ring is a non empty set R together with two binary compositions defined by + and ., and satisfying the following properties hold for any a,b,c\in R:

  • a+b\in R
  • a + b = b + a
  • a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c
  • There exists an element denoted by 0\in R such that a + 0 = a. 0 is called the additive identity or the zero element in R.
  • For each a\in R, there exists an element b\in R such that a + b = 0. b is called additive inverse or negative of a and is written as b=-a so that a+(-a)=0.
  • a.b\in R
  • a.(b.c) = (a.b).c
  • a.(b + c) = a.b + a.c (Left distributive law.)
  • (a + b).c = a.c + b.c (Right distributive law.)


We denote a ring by (R,+,.). When the context is clear we just talk about a ring R and assume that the operations + and . are implicit. We will also drop the . in the operation a.b and just say ab.

The first 5 axioms of a ring just mean that (R,+) is an abelian group. The next two mean that (R,.) is a semi group. A ring is called commutative if a.b=b.a\ \forall a,b\in R. A ring is called boolean if x^2=x\ \forall x\in R . A ring R is called a ring with a unit element or unity or identity if \exists an element e\in R such that ae=ea=a\ \forall a\in R. Let R be a ring with unit element e. An element a\in R is called invertible, if there exists an element b\in R such that ab = ba = e. If n is a positive integer and a an element of a ring R then we define a^n=\underbrace{aa\cdots a}_{n\ times} and na=\underbrace{a+a\cdots +a}_{n\ times}.

[edit] Examples

One of the most important rings is the ring of integers \mathbb{Z} with usual addition and multiplication playing the roles of + and . respectively. It is a commutative ring with identity as 1. The set of even numbers 2\mathbb{Z}:=\{0,\pm 2,\pm 4\cdots\} is an example of a ring without identity. Like \mathbb{Z}, the sets of rational numbers \mathbb{Q}, of real numbers \mathbb{R} and of complex numbers \mathbb{C} are also rings with identity. However \mathbb{N} is not a ring.

The ring of Gaussian integers is given by the set \mathbb{Z}[i]=\{m+ni:m,n\in\mathbb{Z}\} where usual addition and multiplication of complex numbers are the operations. Here i stands (0,1) as is usual in the complex plane.

The set of all n by n matrices with real entries is an example of a non commutative ring with identity, under the usual addition and multiplication of matrices.

[edit] The ring of integers modulo n

We now digress slightly to discuss a special kind of an equivalence relation which gives rise to an important class of finite rings.

Let n be a positive integer. Two integers a and b are said to be congruent modulo n, if their difference a − b is an integer multiple of n. If this is the case, it is expressed as:

a \equiv b \pmod n.\,

The above mathematical statement is read: "a is congruent to b modulo n".

For example,

38 \equiv 14 \pmod {12}\,

because 38 − 14 = 24, which is a multiple of 12. For positive n and non-negative a and b, congruence of a and b can also be thought of as asserting that these two numbers have the same remainder after dividing by the modulus n. So,

38 \equiv 2 \pmod {12}\,

because both numbers, when divided by 12, have the same remainder (2). Equivalently, the fractional parts of doing a full division of each of the numbers by 12 are the same: .1666... (38/12 = 3.166..., 2/12 = .1666...). From the prior definition we also see that their difference, a - b = 36, is a whole number (integer) multiple of 12 ( n = 12, 36/12 = 3).

The same rule holds for negative values of a:

-3 \equiv 2 \pmod 5.\,

The properties that make this relation a congruence relation (respecting addition, subtraction, and multiplication) are the following.

If a_1 \equiv b_1 \pmod n and a_2 \equiv b_2 \pmod n, then:

  • (a_1 + a_2) \equiv (b_1 + b_2) \pmod n\,
  • (a_1 - a_2) \equiv (b_1 - b_2) \pmod n\,
  • (a_1 a_2) \equiv (b_1 b_2) \pmod n.\,

Like any congruence relation, congruence modulo n is an equivalence relation, and the equivalence class of the integer a, denoted by \overline{a}_n, is the set \left\{\ldots, a - 2n, a - n, a, a + n, a + 2n, \ldots \right\}. This set, consisting of the integers congruent to a modulo n, is called the congruence class or residue class of a modulo n. Another notation for this congruence class, which requires that in the context the modulus is known, is \displaystyle [a].

The set of congruence classes modulo n is denoted as \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z} (or, alternatively, \mathbb{Z}/n or \mathbb{Z}_n) and defined by:

\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z} = \left\{ \overline{a}_n | a \in \mathbb{Z}\right\}.

When n ≠ 0, \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z} has n elements, and can be written as:

\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z} = \left\{ \overline{0}_n, \overline{1}_n, \overline{2}_n,\ldots, \overline{n-1}_n \right\}.

We can define addition, subtraction, and multiplication on \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z} by the following rules:

  • \overline{a}_n + \overline{b}_n = \overline{a + b}_n
  • \overline{a}_n - \overline{b}_n = \overline{a - b}_n
  • \overline{a}_n \overline{b}_n = \overline{ab}_n.

The verification that this is a proper definition uses the properties given before.

In this way, \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z} becomes a commutative ring. For example, in the ring \mathbb{Z}/24\mathbb{Z}, we have

\overline{12}_{24} + \overline{21}_{24} = \overline{9}_{24}

as in the arithmetic for the 24-hour clock.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Toolbox
Sister projects
Print/export