Quantum Nanotechnology/NanoQuanta

From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
< Quantum Nanotechnology
Jump to: navigation, search


Interested readers might skim through the contents and leap to this page to discover what it means. Every educated person is aware that energy and matter are equivalent. We also know that energy and matter are interchangeable. We understand this to be true because everybody is aware of Einstein’s famed equation:


This then being true,(or absolute) then the opposite is true where matter is equal to an amount of energy:

                              E = 2mc2

These two equations have been verified in particle accelerators using pair production and mutual annihilation.

Powerful experimental bombs have shown this to be true, as well as successful experiments conducted in huge particle accelerators. But what do we have?

Now that we have a good interpretation of particles and what some do, let us explain something here; something we barely touched upon earlier is the creation of particles. Assuming this to be true then particles could not only be created from spinning photons, they can also be destroyed and/or even replaced.

But what do we indicate when we express "by created and destroyed"? By “create” it is meant to cause photons to gyrate in a certain direction through electric and/or magnetic forces.

By destroy it is meant to cause or create a limit in a particle or un-hitch it to straight way propagation through external electromagnetic force fields.

Now there are a multitude of examples to create and destroy certain particles constituting these finite little buggers but all in all they are never accomplished through such methods or trials and errors. The creation and destruction of spinning photon particles are not done via speed nor velocity of the particle itself.

Since we have already explained that c is constant, and that Ε branches out so to speak to prohibit or limit our actions to a limited set equidistant degrees of freedom from an initial axis - by the very instance of manually established Ε, then it follows that if we try to create and/or destroy these particles with anything out of the ordinary, that starts with energy, we will eventually discover that we are going through the same old tire tracks we did before in trying to overcome faster than light travel by using manually based energy.

When in all fairness it is energy that causes these limitations by it being in debt to G - to manifest positions in the first place - so we need to discard it (in a manual respect too) as unacceptable if we are to ever accomplish this goal…forever.

Considering that an RPS rate revolving about a central axis at c, of the circumference:

                                ___ =RPS

Altercations in D mutate the value for RPS. If it is bigger than a certain value, the RPS of D by c will slow - arriving at the position from which it left (a point on the radius of the outer circumference) later and later. Which is normal causality where a thing arrives to another destination after leaving. But usually in another position crossing intervening space-or position to position.

Intermediate Spacetime

But when D is altered to become more finite, RPS arrives at the same position at the same time it left, and then reduced more finitely the arrival to the same position would seem to occur before leaving - if that were possible, arrival would be earlier than leaving. This is the causality violation we have mentioned to you before - it occurs globally. In normal situations arrival transpires after leaving. Supposing that the point is relocated to any other part of the circumference the same difference is evident.


Distance, (D).

Say for instance that a particle’s distance is expanded to a fixed distance where the value of RPS leaves and arrives at the same position at the exact same time. Will this then indicate that it can now be displaced from P1 at t1 to P2 at t1?

The answer is NO it does not mean this. Initially, because the energy is returning or re-turning to THE present - from THE past in the same space - it therefore is going absolutely nowhere by retaining the value of remaining in the present.

And this is why it cannot arrive before leaving with respect to gravity.

While, in comparison, the exact opposite is true for vast distances unequal to 186,282.4 miles, in 1 second of travel for mass-less energy - for such increases via Quantum Tunneling past c, every expanse (of real space) past this value of D, in straight lines, a corresponding increase past c would be necessary to compensate in the increase of the distance to match 1 second or below.

Literally in straight-line motion to adjust the value of RPS, as would be by rectilinear traversement the value of c would be for the inverse situation - only this applied to straight lines between positions.

Once again we find ourselves back with our old enemy - energy - with it we are doomed to eternal failure in trying to incorporate it into the problem of causing FTL.

Causing more potentiality through gravity might be keyed into negative particles, provided they are timitic or time travitic. Incidentally negative particles and negative matter therefore are not created by forcing them to become smaller via *compression, forcing the energy to borrow against positive energy, and thereby be in-debt - (ed) to energy, because potentiality and Ε are interdependent,as is four-velocity motion being one and the same. The only other way is to cause it to avoid loss in Ε by renewal in Ε.

To manifest such a particle through Increased Deceleration designed to be 1 whole percentage above that of the initial velocity (Relativistically) would also be incorrect, although indication has it that in doing so 2 and even 3 or 4 times above an initial velocity, and depending on the distance also, a (−0) will become apparent.

The reason why this won’t work is again due to the energy requirements necessary in causing an unequivalent increase in deceleration as much as accumulation to an initial velocity. Rest here is immaterial because it is due to gravity when force is applicable.

Timitically, although energy could be avoided while potential, becomes fully manifest in a particle.

But what is happening here? Where are the extremes? First a particle is produced by means of one or more spinning photons or rectilinearly.

The finite distance of it is small enough so that the energy goes from a leaving point on the radius - back in time to return to the present - by coming back from the past - through the future - but NEVER in another position other than the one measured by the point on the radius and never altogether for the entire particle since that would mean it is duplicating the action of the light ring remaining in the present.

Always by (ω) (angular velocity or speed) at c. Always in the same positions when the point is relocated to any other place on the outer circumference.

Timitically - by RPS determined by c over the distance, over and over again, Ε goes back but does not stay back in time. Because coming back to the present requires that it must come from THE past - to THE future - to arrive in THE now.

The more finite although, the more Ε goes back in time as if having to push it there relying on THE future. But ΔD also causes Δt where expansion and contraction of the circumferential distance is available.

*Proper compression of light Quanta forces it to borrow against negative energy to pass through a barrier. Various experiments have yielded in Quantum Tunneling successes of light becoming faster than light and in one 300 times faster.

Since it would be arriving back - before it left, it (the speck) would arrive back before it left in the same position - if the position where different than that referenced, to the point on the radius or the entire distance it might then be feasible to reverse Ε avoiding loss in Ε by renewal in Ε, so as to bring about Ε as avoided by total renewal in potential.

Nominally if a thing goes back in time to a position equal to it - leaving - a finite duration of time after it arrives - will allow it to proceed back to the present by going to the future from the past to/or at the present position from which it left.

What’s interesting about this odd reciprocal behavior, is in that, the reciprocation of the particle in being so finite - is that the value of RPS moves backward through time - to the past coming back to the present to deceive the mind that it is supposedly arriving before leaving, when in reality this deception is only transpiring to the energy renewal in RPS, avoiding loss in energy (that is stopping and restarting (corners), arced)) due to the finite distance about which it traverses.

Did it not already go to the past and come back to the future to the present - only to arrive once again in the past before leaving?


It is again traversing through the past of the same position. What this shows is that the energy - by value of RPS - is traveling more and more to the past from the future the more finite D actually becomes.

So, the trip to the future the energy uses in RPS to return to the present begins to become smaller for every return before leaving - comprising as it were, any equilibrium that would be occurant if D were fixed at a circumference where leaving a position and arriving at a position were both at the same time, Aleodelogically.

When (and I mean this figuratively) the trip to the future decreases to 0 by the return trip - to the same position, travels or arrives in that past.

But because we are programmed to believe that zero is the limit, we assume that when D approaches 0 distance, no distance, that the whole process comes to a screeching halt and either ceases or discontinues.

(MC - (But does not cessation come from result of partially automated systems with respect to automated space-time?


But is this the case seeing the evidence laid out before us?

The answer to this is a definite NO.


The reasoning behind this is due to outcomes. In conjunction with this do you recall that loss in energy is being avoided by the renewal of energy about the distance at c by RPS? It is these outcomes (at least for energy) that determine the future (or possible result) for energy.

So if energy possesses no outcome - to result in, then how then can it be in the present?

And without a present or now there can be no df. Perhaps this sounds a bit confusing to the reader and I do not mean to wander so let’s explain what this means. In the presence of energy there are enough positions throughout the universe that account for degrees of freedom, any one of them are possible for Ε.

But for these degrees of freedom to come out in an outcome they must possess a past also to emerge from, (under normal circumstances) one that can go to THE future to be present in THE now.

Thus all energy in whatever form - formulates by emergence from THE past to THE future and into THE now.

This statement alone should be clear to you.

The result of energy formulating from the past to remain attached to the now, is degrees of freedom by retainment of Ε in the present - all equivalently but never in the same position.

These degrees of freedom incurred by energy to time prevent travel beyond the “now” so that now-retainment of energy creates df, repititically - (that is we can move in so many df and then they eventually repeat) past to future to now equilibrium. Relativistically all three (past, future and now) interdependently “stretch”, where vast distance compensation in speed at c is needed to compensate for the extensive distance to reduce time-being unequal to c to D.

So in establishments of Ε, the interdependency of time is set up (so to speak) to prohibit Ε into the “now”, so that the now-and consequently the inability to go beyond it - (which would collapse the df via time travitics) acts as or is the df itself - thus preventing travel beyond the now by retention in it through the establishments of energy in debt to G in this repetitive past to future to now -- equilibrium.

Therefore this interdependency for Ε is df in the retention of Ε in the now.