Econometric Theory/Asymptotic Convergence
From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection
Contents
|
[edit] Asymptotic Convergence
[edit] Modes of Convergence
[edit] Convergence in Probability
Convergence in probability is going to be a very useful tool for deriving asymptotic distributions later on in this book. Alongside convergence in distribution it will be the most commonly seen mode of convergence.
[edit] Definition
A sequence of random variables
converges in probability to X if:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
an equivalent statement is:
![]() |
![]() |
This will be written as either
or
.
[edit] Example

We'll make an intelligent guess that this series converges in probability to the degenerate random variable η. So we have that:

Therefore our definition for convergence in probability in this case is:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
So for any positive values of
we can always find an
large enough so that our definition is satisfied. Therefore we have proved that
.
[edit] Convergence Almost Sure
Almost-sure convergence has a marked similarity to convergence in probability, however the conditions for this mode of convergence are stronger; as we will see later, convergence almost surely actually implies that the sequence also converges in probability.
[edit] Definition
A sequence of random variables
converges almost surely to the random variable X if:
![]() |
![]() |
equivalently
![]() |
Under these conditions we use the notation
or
.
[edit] Example
Let's see if our example from the convergence in probability section also converges almost surely. Defining:

we again guess that the convergence is to η. Inspecting the resulting expression we see that:
![]() |
Thereby satisfying our definition of almost-sure convergence.
[edit] Convergence in Distribution
Convergence in distribution will appear very frequently in our econometric models through the use of the Central Limit Theorem. So let's define this type of convergence.
[edit] Definition
A sequence of random variables
asymptotically converges in distribution to the random variable X if
for all continuity points.
and
are the cumulative density functions of Xn and X respectively.
It is the distribution of the random variable that we are concerned with here. Think of a students-T distribution: as the degrees of freedom, n, increases our distribution becomes closer and closer to that of a gaussian distribution. Therefore the random variable
converges in distribution to the random variable
(n.b. we say that the random variable
as a notational crutch, what we really should use is
/
[edit] Example
Let's consider the distribution Xn whose sample space consists of two points, 1/n and 1, with equal probability (1/2). Let X be the binomial distribution with p = 1/2. Then Xn converges in distribution to X.
The proof is simple: we ignore 0 and 1 (where the distribution of X is discontinuous) and prove that, for all other points a,
. Since for a < 0 all Fs are 0, and for a > 1 all Fs are 1, it remains to prove the convergence for 0 < a < 1. But
(using Iverson brackets), so for any a chose N > 1/a, and for n > N we have:
So the sequence
converges to
for all points where FX is continuous.
[edit] Convergence in R-mean Square
Convergence in R-mean square is not going to be used in this book, however for completeness the definition is provided below.
[edit] Definition
A sequence of random variables
asymptotically converges in r-th mean (or in the Lr norm) to the random variable X if, for any real number r > 0 and provided that
for all n and
,

[edit] Cramer-Wold Device
The Cramer-Wold device will allow us to extend our convergence techniques for random variables from scalars to vectors.
[edit] Definition
A random vector
.
[edit] Relationships betweeen Modes of Convergence
[edit] Law of Large Numbers
[edit] Central Limit Theorem
Let
be a sequence of random variables which are defined on the same probability space, share the same probability distribution D and are independent. Assume that both the expected value μ and the standard deviation σ of D exist and are finite.
Consider the sum
. Then the expected value of
is nμ and its standard error is σ n1/2. Furthermore, informally speaking, the distribution of Sn approaches the normal distribution N(nμ,σ2n) as n approaches ∞.










![n > 1/a \rightarrow a > 1/n \rightarrow [a \ge \frac{1}{n}] = 1 \land [a \ge 1] = 0 \rightarrow F_{X_n}(a) = \frac{1}{2}\,](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/3/2/a/32a8621f9faab2acde51e53bba6ad0e4.png)