Algebra/Proofs/Exercises
From Wikibooks, the open-content textbooks collection
Contents |
[edit] Proof exercises
1. Show that the identity:holds for all positive integers.
First, we show that it holds for integers 1, 2 and 3
- 1 = 2×1/2
- 1 + 2 = 3×2/2
- 1 + 2 + 3 = 4×3/2 = 6
Suppose the identiy holds for some number k, then
is true.
We aim to show that:
is also true. We proceed
which is what we have set out to show. Since the identity holds for 3, it also holds for 4 and since it holds for 4 it also holds for 5, and 6 and 7 and so on.
2. Show that n! > 2n for n ≥ 4.
The claim is true for n = 4. As 4! > 24, i.e. 24 > 16. Now suppose it's true for n = k, k ≥ 4, i.e.
- k! > 2k
it follows that
- (k+1)k! > (k+1)2k > 2k+1
- (k+1)! > 2k+1
We have shown that if for n = k then it's also true for n = k + 1. Since it's true for n = 4, it's true for n = 5, 6, 7, 8 and so on for all n.
3. Show that:![]()
Suppose it's true for n = k, i.e.
it follows that
We have shown that if it's true for n = k then it's also true for n = k + 1. Now it's true for n = 1 (clear). Therefore it's true for all integers.
[edit] More on induction
1. Prove by induction that the given formula is true for every positive integer n.
i) 
ii) 
iii) 
iv) 
v) 
vi) 
vii) 
viii) ![(1+2^5+...+n^5)+(1+2^7+...+n^7)=2\left[\frac{n(n+1)}{2}\right]^4](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/5/e/95ea1ad0f9659b8671a3f577f12c10e1.png)
ix) 
2. Prove that the following inequalities hold for all 
i)
if
(the so called Bernoulli's inequality)
ii) 
iii)
(Hard)
3. Prove by induction that the following statements are true for every positive integer n
i) 3 is a factor of n3 - n + 3
ii) 9 is a factor of 
iii) 4 is a factor of 5n - 1
iv) x - y is a factor of xn - yn
v) 72n - 48n - 1 is dividible by 2304
4. In each case find
such that the inequality holds for all
, and give a proof by induction.
i) n! > 2n
[edit] Solutions for "More on Induction"
[edit] 1.
[edit] i)
2 + 4 + 6 + ... + 2k = k(k + 1)
First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
- 2 + 4 + 6 + ... + 2k = k(k + 1)
We aim to show that 2 + 4 + 6 + ... + 2k + 2(k + 1) = (k + 1)(k + 2).
Adding 2(k + 1) to both sides,
- 2 + 4 + 6 + ... + 2k + 2(k + 1) = k(k + 1) + 2(k + 1)
- 2 + 4 + 6 + ... + 2k + 2(k + 1) = (k + 1)(k + 2),
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
[edit] ii)

First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
.
Adding 3(k + 1) − 2 = 3k + 1 to both sides,
,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
[edit] iii)

First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
, same as
.
Adding 5(k + 1) − 3 = 5k + 2 to both sides,
,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
[edit] iv)

First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
- 1 = 1 + (1 − 1)21 = 1
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
, same as
.
Adding
to both sides,
,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
[edit] v)

First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
, same as
.
Adding (k + 1)2 to both sides,

,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
[edit] vi)

First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
, same as
.
Adding
to both sides,

,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
This problem can be solved without mathematical induction. We note that
. Then, the question can be paraphrased as
, which simplfies to
, or
. Q.E.D.
[edit] vii)

First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
.
Adding 3k + 1 to both sides,

,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
This can also be proven using the sum formula for a geometric series.
[edit] viii)
![(1+2^5+...+n^5)+(1+2^7+...+n^7)=2 \left[ \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \right] ^4](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/5/e/95ea1ad0f9659b8671a3f577f12c10e1.png)
First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
.
Adding (k + 1)5 + (k + 1)7 to both sides,
![\begin{matrix}
(1+2^5+...+k^5+(k+1)^5)+(1+2^7+...+k^7+(k+1)^7)&=& 2 \left[ \frac{k(k+1)}{2} \right] ^4+(k+1)^5+(k+1)^7
\\ \ &=& \frac{1}{8} k^4 (k+1)^4+(k+1)^5+(k+1)^7
\\ \ &=& \frac{1}{8} (k+1)^4 (k^4 +8(k+1)+8(k+1)^3)
\\ \ &=& \frac{1}{8} (k+1)^4 (k^4 +8k+8+8k^3+24k^2+24k+8)
\\ \ &=& \frac{1}{8} (k+1)^4 (k^4 +8k^3+24k^2+32k+16)
\\ \ &=& \frac{1}{8} (k+1)^4 (k+2)^4
\\ \ &=& 2 \left[ \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2} \right] ^4
\end{matrix}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/f/1/df1e636061927d19c163723927bd1846.png)
,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
[edit] ix)

First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
.
Adding rk to both sides,

,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
This problem can be solved without using mathematical induction.

multiply both sides by 1 − r
(1 + r + r2 + ... + rn − 1)(1 − r) = 1 − rn
expand,
((1 − r) + (r − r2) + (r2 − r3)...(rn − 1 − rn) = 1 − rn
and simplify.
1 − rn = 1 − rn. Q.E.D.
[edit] 2.
====i)====
if 
First, we show that this statement holds for n=1.
because 
Assume that the equation holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
.
Multyplying (1 + x) by both sides, (desn't alter the sign of the inequality because
, and so
)

The last step relies on the fact that
, since
and a square is always greater than or equal to 0.
,
which is what we set out to prove. By mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
====ii)==== 
First, we show that this statement holds for n = 1 and n = 2.
because 
because 1 < 4 < 9
Assume that the inequality holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that
and 
We know that
(added k3 to both sides of
).
Now we need to show that 

The last statement is clearly true (k > 0). Therefore,
and thus
.
Now we show that
. We know that
(added (k + 1)3 to both sides of
). Now we need to show that 

The last statement is clearly true (k > 0). Therefore,
and thus
.
Multyplying (1 + x) by both sides, (desn't alter the sign of the inequality because
, and so
) Combining both inequalities we proved, we get the one we needed for the inductive step.
and
,
and by mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
====iii)==== 
First, we show that this statement holds for n = 1.
because 
Assume that the inequality holds for n=k. Then,
We aim to show that 
We know that
(added
to both sides of
).
Now we need to show that 

The last statement is clearly true. Therefore,
and thus
, the inductive step, and by mathematical induction, the formula holds for all
.
holds for all positive integers.






















![1+1=2 \left[ \frac{1(1+1)}{2} \right] ^4=2](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/f/f/7/ff7c52c50864f7f955d8eb1101fd7916.png)
![(1+2^5+...+k^5)+(1+2^7+...+k^7)=2 \left[ \frac{k(k+1)}{2} \right] ^4](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/c/5/cc59486bfd67aeaeb5caf6015a6f30d8.png)



